General Discussion

jaxexpat

(6,831 posts)

13. Garland is too busy to pursue these criminals.

Thu Mar 28, 2024, 10:09 AM

Mar 28

It is, after all, hard work finding comparable instances of equal crimes by Democratic operatives.

Dear Garland,
The country is tired of you mealy mouthed malingering.
Your friend,
Concerned American citizen

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

44 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Why Can't DOJ Indict John Eastman and Jeffrey Clark [View all] gab13by13 Mar 28 OP

Because grand juries indict. marble falls Mar 28 #1

You get my point. gab13by13 Mar 28 #2

Eastman's been indicted already, not by the Feds, but he has been recommended for prosecution to DoJ ... marble falls Mar 28 #3

That is one hell of a cop out then by DOJ gab13by13 Mar 28 #6

And...he's going to be recommended by the law bar to be disbarred. PortTack Mar 28 #12

Needs to be locked up behind bars for at least 10 years MichMan Mar 28 #14

Clark won't need his law degree working for Trump, gab13by13 Mar 28 #19

They are literally planning the next one. onecaliberal Mar 28 #26

Garland refusing to prosecute Republicans that are sabotaging our democracy is most definitely partisan. nt Trueblue Texan Mar 28 #4

No action yet / no comment is NOT the same as "refusing" Bernardo de La Paz Mar 28 #11

Except for the fact that there is no action Bobstandard Mar 28 #23

I'm calling you on that. Post links to "lies and damned lies" on the part of the DoJ Bernardo de La Paz Mar 28 #24

semantics Nutty Putty Mar 28 #25

Welcome to DU. I'm not defending DoJ as strongly as you might think, but regardless, I'm not embarrassed. . . .nt Bernardo de La Paz Mar 28 #27

Telling n/t Nutty Putty Mar 28 #30

"Telling"? You've got nothing or you would have posted it. . . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Mar 28 #33

Yes. Apologists Nutty Putty Mar 28 #35

He's federalist society. He's protecting them. onecaliberal Mar 28 #29

He's too afraid of being called partisan by the right. Trueblue Texan Mar 28 #42

I'm of another opinion. onecaliberal Mar 28 #44

Might look partisan Bettie Mar 28 #5

Why has TSF not been indicted edhopper Mar 28 #7

Pomerantz and Dunne worked 2 years building a case for financial fraud gab13by13 Mar 28 #8

Once again, you don't know what you don't know Fiendish Thingy Mar 28 #9

It could easily be that DoJ doesn't want to upset the tRump case in DC. Plus they Bernardo de La Paz Mar 28 #10

Garland is too busy to pursue these criminals. jaxexpat Mar 28 #13

And Smith wanted to move faster.. surfered Mar 28 #15

I already said that, did you read my thread? gab13by13 Mar 28 #17

I never said that I know what I don't know. gab13by13 Mar 28 #16

Co-conspirators have not been indicted due to DOJ (Jack Smith) strategy Jersey Devil Mar 28 #18

I already said that, I agree with you, gab13by13 Mar 28 #21

I presume there are hundreds of Rod Rosensteins still within DOJ Ponietz Mar 28 #40

Now that we know things are not speedy, they should be indicted. onecaliberal Mar 28 #31

Ignore the nut in the brown shirt. usonian Mar 28 #20

Can't or WON'T? Wild blueberry Mar 28 #22

So far I have gotten one possible reason: discovery. gab13by13 Mar 28 #28

Recommend, onecaliberal Mar 28 #32

You must have forgotten the lesson of that old... dchill Mar 28 #34

Nope, believe it or not, gab13by13 Mar 28 #36

Hands must appear to be clean... dchill Mar 28 #38

This is another way of asking my question, gab13by13 Mar 28 #37

Not enough manpower, gotta investigate Hunter Biden's peepee first 617Blue Mar 28 #39

To political. republianmushroom Mar 28 #41

Answer: Defendants aren't convicted based on "we know he's guilty".... brooklynite Mar 28 #43