Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Rejected': Trump bond filing 'returned for correction' over botched lawyering [View all]SunSeeker
(51,824 posts)37. I doubt either omission was an accident. No lawyer wants to sign Trump docs, and his financials are incriminating.
So yes, this was "convenient," to put it mildly.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
69 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Rejected': Trump bond filing 'returned for correction' over botched lawyering [View all]
alwaysinasnit
Apr 3
OP
I'd be embarrassed by this screw up were I them, but what delay do you think this engenders?
rsdsharp
Apr 3
#52
Hmmm...done deliberately or they don't have these documents? Probably all of the things.
SWBTATTReg
Apr 3
#2
It might be that the financial statement is toxic to Trump as per getting the bond and so it wasn't...
Botany
Apr 3
#6
So they forgot both the 'current financial statement' and a signature by the attorney of record.
Voltaire2
Apr 3
#7
Yeah somehow I think the failure to include the financial statement was not "inadvertent". The lack of
Bev54
Apr 3
#17
Any halfway decent lawyer or even a paralegal would have marked where the senior lawyer would..
Botany
Apr 3
#20
Yes they use stickers for that but then these people are not known for their expert skills.
Bev54
Apr 3
#21
I doubt that they would have used signature stickers on a document like that but you can be .....
Botany
Apr 3
#29
Stickers are used all the time on legal documents, usually put there by the assistants.
Bev54
Apr 3
#31
I doubt either omission was an accident. No lawyer wants to sign Trump docs, and his financials are incriminating.
SunSeeker
Apr 3
#37
Obviously any lawyer that signs on to defend Trump is too stupid to be a lawyer.
Ping Tung
Apr 3
#19
A current financial statement? Trump has never had a financial statement that wasn't fraudulent. Good luck.😊
ashredux
Apr 3
#22
Missing Trump financial statement or missing the surety's financial statement? Could be the latter.
onenote
Apr 3
#26
Here is what was a filed in the Carroll case that was accepted by Carroll and the court.
onenote
Apr 3
#45
And the signature? The 2 things missing suggest the bond company never saw this filing.
Hermit-The-Prog
Apr 3
#40
Delay tactic. Only question is: did this move back (reset) the 10 day period? Hope not.........
machoneman
Apr 3
#32
Back in the day, rumor had it that if you owed taxes and could not pay, you could delay by not signing your tax return.
PatrickforB
Apr 3
#54
Not Trump's financials. The surety company's financials. Another blunder by Raw Story.
onenote
Apr 4
#62