Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

NanaCat

(2,332 posts)
41. Oh FFS
Mon Jun 3, 2024, 07:58 PM
Jun 2024

They have to be able to find the people first, and that is not easy to do.

Surely you realize that it's not the 80s anymore, where the cops can trace landlines to their source if they can keep the person on the line 30 seconds. That world no longer exists. Scammers can call you right now, and your caller ID will show your own bloody number as the person calling you. Do you have even the faintest realisation of the technological sophistication that takes?

To trace a call to its origin in the 21st century where the rest of us live, investigators need to get through proxies, firewalls, VPNs, crypto filters and I have no idea how many more layers of opacity bouncing off satellites and into and out of multiple countries all across the planet. Some numbers can never be traced back to their source, and if you can't find who called, guess what? Law enforcement can't arrest them. And if law enforcement can't find them, then the DOJ can't do jack about bringing them to justice.

FFS, I don't even watch the telly, but even I know the cop shows have addressed how this impedes them from finding perpetrators via phone call. The one with the flaky but brilliant blonde computer geek--Criminal Minds? That show was addressing this very issue back in the 00s, from what blared from my Mum's telly back then.

Where have you been that you think it's still the 80s with the quaint tracing of landline calls to find criminals?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

What does "swatted" mean? I looked "swat" up in Urban Dictionary... LAS14 Jun 2024 #1
people make a distress call to police RANDYWILDMAN Jun 2024 #5
And if they don't like your looks you might get your ass shot off. flashman13 Jun 2024 #34
I think giving the cops a rival's address, claiming they're making bombs or something. The GPV Jun 2024 #6
Generally: orange jar Jun 2024 #7
When you call a complaint to the cops..... usedtobedemgurl Jun 2024 #9
Calling in a false police report such that a SWAT team response is likely Stinky The Clown Jun 2024 #12
false police call . AllaN01Bear Jun 2024 #35
Special Weapons and Tactics (Swat) DoBW Jun 2024 #42
He is going after a witness RANDYWILDMAN Jun 2024 #2
I'd assume a SWATting is next. Despicable underpants Jun 2024 #3
Is There No Way To Trace This? WiVoter Jun 2024 #4
Of course there IS. onecaliberal Jun 2024 #8
I Don't Think Michael Will Let This Pass WiVoter Jun 2024 #11
It's not like people can just sell their homes or pay for alternative places to live. This is fucked up beyond measure. onecaliberal Jun 2024 #17
Right. He knows who to call. He's had a long term relationship with the SDNY and the FBI should get on this. ancianita Jun 2024 #20
He can't DO anything about it. onecaliberal Jun 2024 #44
I think it's more local police departments soldierant Jun 2024 #39
First thing I think of since PlutosHeart Jun 2024 #19
They can. Think. Again. Jun 2024 #25
Because people aren't using landlines for this NanaCat Jun 2024 #37
Depends on how sloppy they are JoseBalow Jun 2024 #31
The GOP is a crime syndicate and this is the new normal. Irish_Dem Jun 2024 #10
Past time to kill off the Republicans. Traurigkeit Jun 2024 #28
This is what Republicans do. This is who they are. DFW Jun 2024 #13
If you want it to stop, make sure everybody you know votes in November. That will start the DNA SupportSanity Jun 2024 #21
We aren't quite there scienftifically yet soldierant Jun 2024 #40
Scientifically, yes. But how about the DNA of the GOP party itself? SupportSanity Jun 2024 #48
Ah. Alrighty, then. soldierant Jun 2024 #49
Yet another Domestic Terrorism charge NOT brought by the DOJ. Think. Again. Jun 2024 #14
Doxing is not terrorism. A terrorist act is an action that hits the general public. This is what Michael Cohen knows... ancianita Jun 2024 #23
From the link you provided... Think. Again. Jun 2024 #24
Doxing is posting, not threat. It's invasion of privacy. Terrorist intent to cause fear must be PROVEN, as you know. ancianita Jun 2024 #27
Seems the intent of doxing and swatting is to create fear in large groups of people SomedayKindaLove Jun 2024 #43
I get your line of argument. I just think that until you can show the DOJ how to prove the intent and messaging, ancianita Jun 2024 #45
Oh FFS NanaCat Jun 2024 #41
nonsense. Technology has improved, not degraded. Think. Again. Jun 2024 #47
We need to make doxing illegal across the US. Currently, it's sinkingfeeling Jun 2024 #15
And put some HARSH penalties on the crime! 70sEraVet Jun 2024 #18
Doxing/swatting is a real concern, imo. orange jar Jun 2024 #16
This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Jun 2024 #29
Mob tactics orangecrush Jun 2024 #22
The Silence is Deafening Owens Jun 2024 #26
And then there's Google. Anyone can find out what Google/Google Images/Google Maps knows about them. ancianita Jun 2024 #46
This is how Russia and China built a compliant, docile citizenry. Irish_Dem Jun 2024 #30
i wonder if theyse morons know swatting is a federal crime moonshinegnomie Jun 2024 #32
K&R spanone Jun 2024 #33
Unfortunately, this is what awaits any member of FailureToCommunicate Jun 2024 #36
trump's tantrums would be silly, except they get people killed. Torchlight Jun 2024 #38
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Michael Cohen's family do...»Reply #41