Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
I thought it was looking for the most competent person for the job. Gore1FL Jul 25 #1
Yes the lesson learned: we need the most competent person. Irish_Dem Jul 25 #2
Winning is the first priority edhopper Jul 25 #8
Good point. But we need a VP who can win a presidential campaign on their own. Irish_Dem Jul 25 #12
I am not worried about edhopper Jul 25 #14
2030 sounds like an eon away. But it's only 6 years away. Wouldn't hurt to have someone on the younger side. flying_wahini Jul 25 #29
Why edhopper Jul 25 #36
I submit going for the most competent is conducive to winning. nt Gore1FL Jul 25 #25
They are all competent edhopper Jul 25 #80
LOL, OK. nt Gore1FL Jul 25 #82
It's edhopper Jul 25 #5
Everyone that is being considered is competent enough JI7 Jul 25 #10
If you lose because you didn't pick a VP who could help deliver a state's electoral votes elocs Jul 25 #16
The first job is winning the election. tinrobot Jul 25 #20
Yes Zeitghost Jul 25 #46
And going with the most competent person derails winning the election, how, exactly? nt Gore1FL Jul 25 #48
Competent at what? Zeitghost Jul 25 #51
At doing past jobs in general. Gore1FL Jul 25 #73
There are millions of people Zeitghost Jul 25 #78
Part of the strategy of winning is proving to the voter that we can think in terms of long-term value to them. Gore1FL Jul 25 #81
That is indeed [i]part[/i] of the strategy Zeitghost Jul 25 #94
Do we have actual supporting numbers that say people will vote on a VP based on their state? Gore1FL Jul 25 #118
You keep going back to location Zeitghost Jul 25 #121
I'm curious H2O Man Jul 25 #112
In my opinion, Mayor Pete is the smartest guy in the room. Gore1FL Jul 25 #117
Thank you. H2O Man Jul 25 #122
You are correct. See current VP Harris. we can do it Jul 25 #58
And all being considered are very competent. Elessar Zappa Jul 25 #89
It's not just competence. They are ALL competent. I agree with the OP: it's the what else they bring to the table FlyingPiggy Jul 25 #90
Define the "what elses," please. Gore1FL Jul 25 #92
PA and AZ, white straight men, moderates/independents/old gaird republicans FlyingPiggy Jul 25 #93
We took the safe choice in 1988, and 2016. Gore1FL Jul 25 #111
We lost 2016 due to bitter infighting between hillary and bernie. I think we learned a big lesson since then. FlyingPiggy Jul 25 #119
I'm Not going to refight 2016 with you. Gore1FL Jul 25 #120
I'm not refighting 2016, either. But it was EXTREMELY contentious. If you think that didn't play into the results, then FlyingPiggy Jul 25 #123
I assume you are being sarcastic, but both matter. Happy Hoosier Jul 25 #97
I'm with you Gore... democratsruletheday Jul 25 #101
I mean with Shapiro right in front of us and willing ColinC Jul 25 #3
Kamala is good on the individual rights issues - abortion, reproductive rights, civil rights MaryMagdaline Jul 25 #4
Who can deliver A state? How about who can reach voters in many swing states? Or who can Nanjeanne Jul 25 #6
Yes edhopper Jul 25 #9
So they vote for the party of the person who was their senator? Why have we lost rural white Nanjeanne Jul 25 #23
GOTV edhopper Jul 25 #26
I think they voted for the person they thought would economically make their lives better and Nanjeanne Jul 25 #44
Have running mates always brought their states? Ocelot II Jul 25 #7
Yes edhopper Jul 25 #11
No SocialDemocrat61 Jul 25 #54
I would wager the last VP nominee who brought their state was Mondale. Self Esteem Jul 25 #77
I tend to agree but it is possible someone like Kelly could also help deliver PA and other rust belt states. honest.abe Jul 25 #13
They have to look at internal polling edhopper Jul 25 #15
You can believe that. Don't know if we'll get to see any of that. kerry-is-my-prez Jul 25 #96
We won't edhopper Jul 25 #98
Whoever helps Kamala get 270 electoral votes. dalton99a Jul 25 #17
Shapiro would lock Pa but may well cost Michigan, however he has the energy and oratory that might shore up OnDoutside Jul 25 #18
These are the questions edhopper Jul 25 #19
Indeed, though it's great to have so many quality people, even those I haven't mentioned. OnDoutside Jul 25 #22
What about Shapiro would cost us MI?? honest.abe Jul 25 #21
Gaza, pure and simple, is a huge issue amongst the Arab American community in Michigan, whereas Shapiro has been OnDoutside Jul 25 #24
We are not talking about a Dem primary here. honest.abe Jul 25 #30
Even in the Primary Whitmer lost those voters JI7 Jul 25 #34
That's my point. This is not a primary. honest.abe Jul 25 #47
My point was she still won JI7 Jul 25 #70
Ah gotcha! Good point! honest.abe Jul 25 #71
I imagine those vetting VP candidates consider everything. ITo be "not sure" how the voting Ninga Jul 25 #40
I thought this was about how to win swing states. If popular vote mattered we would have no problem Nanjeanne Jul 25 #45
Yes, I was talking about Michigan. honest.abe Jul 25 #49
Yes but won't Rs vote Trump? Losing young and Muslim/Arab vote and pro Palestinian Jewish Nanjeanne Jul 25 #50
Good grief. Im not talking about Republicans. honest.abe Jul 25 #53
Good grief. Breathe. It's a discussion board. Nanjeanne Jul 25 #56
Well sorry but your comments struck me as odd. We all know how Republicans will vote. honest.abe Jul 25 #59
And my post was about Democrats. Not Republicans. But no matter. Nanjeanne Jul 25 #61
Sorry I misunderstood your post. honest.abe Jul 25 #62
No problem. I like discussions! Nanjeanne Jul 25 #68
Minor factor 🤐 quaint Jul 25 #79
Michigan has the greatest number of Arab Americans of any swing state, by far. OnDoutside Jul 25 #66
Im also good with Kelly. I suspect he could also help deliver PA and other rust belt states. honest.abe Jul 25 #69
I get the feeling that it has been the vociferous nature OnDoutside Jul 25 #109
Yes that is likely it. honest.abe Jul 25 #110
Tight? moose65 Jul 25 #32
There are 211,000 Arab Americans in Michigan, the most of any battleground state. OnDoutside Jul 25 #63
So his "star quality" could very well outshine the negative effects of his "jewishness". honest.abe Jul 25 #64
Yes it could very well, and that's my point, is it worth taking the gamble on Michigan if it means he locks Pa and OnDoutside Jul 25 #67
Agree about Gaza phoenix_rising Jul 25 #39
Michigan and Wisconsin are at risk. Tetrachloride Jul 25 #43
Kelly is from NJ and was in the military for 25 years. LeftInTX Jul 25 #113
Gore couldn't even deliver his own state of NC, so I'm not sure about this tactic. TheRickles Jul 25 #27
Gore is not from NC moose65 Jul 25 #33
Yes, you are correct - thanks. My bad, but the point still stands. TheRickles Jul 25 #37
Yes, and when Gore ran for president in 2000 pinkstarburst Jul 25 #88
Pete Buttigieg lives in MI phoenix_rising Jul 25 #28
Beshear or Walz might bring rust belt states. yorkster Jul 25 #31
this isn't an ageism slam but agingdem Jul 25 #35
I hope she picks someone on the younger side. CrispyQ Jul 25 #38
I don't believe that for one fucking second. The choice for VP is who the candidate thinks best shares their Autumn Jul 25 #41
The idea that a VP can "deliver a state" is dogma with little grounding in reality Prairie Gates Jul 25 #42
It's old and probably worked before TV was available. LeftInTX Jul 25 #114
Harris is from California, would we have won Cali without her? we can do it Jul 25 #52
Probably SocialDemocrat61 Jul 25 #57
Yes. We're solid blue moonscape Jul 25 #65
MSNBC had two guests on to talk about research on veeps spooky3 Jul 25 #55
NPR said today that experience proved to be more of a vote getter than their state. Peregrine Took Jul 25 #60
I agree! We aren't in the 1950's, 40's, 30,'s, and 20's anymore LeftInTX Jul 25 #115
Yes and no SocialDemocrat61 Jul 25 #72
My top 3 are Beshear, Cooper and Walz. But I'm starting to really get excited about Walz. Whatever Nanjeanne Jul 25 #74
Mayor Pete for VP bushalert Jul 25 #75
Right on! 🔥 n/t phoenix_rising Jul 25 #76
If Kamala picks Pete and loses, how many more presidential elections will it be before Dems pic a gay man or woman elocs Jul 25 #116
That's so old school! bif Jul 25 #83
It still has to be the best candidate edhopper Jul 25 #84
You know I am beginning to think we can win this with almost any of the top 4 or 5 VP candidates being mentioned. honest.abe Jul 25 #85
The last VP who delivered a state was LBJ in the 1960s pinkstarburst Jul 25 #86
What about Tim Kaine 2016? honest.abe Jul 25 #91
Yes, good point wendyb-NC Jul 25 #87
IMHO, because of the vulgarity of Trump... WarGamer Jul 25 #95
Not a bad choice edhopper Jul 25 #99
that's misleading. WarGamer Jul 25 #100
Those are still depressing edhopper Jul 25 #102
The convention may be a chance for a bounce. WarGamer Jul 25 #103
That is BIG edhopper Jul 25 #104
Whoever is chosen will likely become our presumptive nominee in a few years. BluesRunTheGame Jul 25 #105
I am not worried about edhopper Jul 25 #106
They almost always run... BluesRunTheGame Jul 25 #107
Not for me edhopper Jul 25 #108
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»VP choice, it's who can d...»Reply #27