Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

grahamhgreen

(15,741 posts)
Fri Dec 7, 2012, 03:53 PM Dec 2012

Stupid - "Administration Weighs Legal Action Against States That Legalized Marijuana Use" [View all]

"Even as marijuana legalization supporters are celebrating their victories in the two states, the Obama administration has been holding high-level meetings since the election to debate the response of federal law enforcement agencies to the decriminalization efforts.

Marijuana use in both states continues to be illegal under the federal Controlled Substances Act. One option is to sue the states on the grounds that any effort to regulate marijuana is pre-empted by federal law. Should the Justice Department prevail, it would raise the possibility of striking down the entire initiatives on the theory that voters would not have approved legalizing the drug without tight regulations and licensing similar to controls on hard alcohol.

Some law enforcement officials, alarmed at the prospect that marijuana users in both states could get used to flouting federal law openly, are said to be pushing for a stern response. But such a response would raise political complications for President Obama because marijuana legalization is popular among liberal Democrats who just turned out to re-elect him.

“It’s a sticky wicket for Obama,” said Bruce Buchanan, a political science professor at the University of Texas at Austin, saying any aggressive move on such a high-profile question would be seen as “a slap in the face to his base right after they’ve just handed him a chance to realize his presidential dreams.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/07/us/marijuana-initiatives-in-2-states-set-federal-officials-scrambling.html?_r=0
- NYT



Let's face it, Cannabis advocates are some of the most tenacious, ambitious, and successful political advocates in our party.

It's not possible for the administration to be so stupid as to deliver millions of liberal Dem votes into the hands of Libertarian wing of the Republican party, is it?

38 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Is anyone surprised by this former-republican Dec 2012 #1
Not so, the change to Prohibition started in the states. RomneyLies Dec 2012 #8
The resources the Feds have now are vastly more powerful former-republican Dec 2012 #13
I agree. If Obama goes through with fighting Colorado and Washington, that will be bluestate10 Dec 2012 #29
Me, too! StrictlyRockers Dec 2012 #34
The Feds don't have to enforce it. DefenseLawyer Dec 2012 #10
I agree that would be entirely up to President Obama former-republican Dec 2012 #16
For God's sake, the Admin failed to prosecute torture, Bush crimes and Banksters. grahamhgreen Dec 2012 #23
good point, thanks! wildbilln864 Dec 2012 #33
Wrong. Comrade Grumpy Dec 2012 #19
Where did I say that any where in my post? former-republican Dec 2012 #21
Actually I don't think it would be like that. If it's legal...... socialist_n_TN Dec 2012 #31
Obama can leash the DEA and have them just focus on state borders and work with states that bluestate10 Dec 2012 #30
I would think that they could all get together and discuss this .... socialindependocrat Dec 2012 #2
There are many single issue voters out there. mick063 Dec 2012 #3
Exactly. And this group of voters is highly motivated, dedicated, and effective advocates grahamhgreen Dec 2012 #4
Those were not the only presidents to do so . Check out George Washington, et al. AnotherMcIntosh Dec 2012 #7
That and the 1% can make money from it. RomneyLies Dec 2012 #9
cannabinoid use has already been patented -by the feds-really green for victory Dec 2012 #14
Stupid? I don't agree. We've been told that Obama is very smart. And he is. AnotherMcIntosh Dec 2012 #5
Exactly where is the surprise here? nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #6
The surprise is that a move against decrim could cost us multiple elections, grahamhgreen Dec 2012 #11
Alas that is not. The calculus. nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #12
Those voting blocks will not win them elections. grahamhgreen Dec 2012 #24
You are thinking that way, they are not nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #25
That is one reason why I can't believe that the White House is that fucking blind. bluestate10 Dec 2012 #28
Rescheduling doesn't change anything when it comes to legalization. Comrade Grumpy Dec 2012 #20
Nothing will change until something major happens nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #22
Don't be stupid Obama and go against the will of the people Ya Basta Dec 2012 #15
The ACA was originally justified under the commerce clause green for victory Dec 2012 #18
POTUS Obama slapped many of us in the face during his first term. PufPuf23 Dec 2012 #17
No, it is not stupid. It is fucking stupid. bluestate10 Dec 2012 #26
It is absoulutely anti-democratic. The people have spoken, now he should support democracy; or grahamhgreen Dec 2012 #36
dumb dumb move... a sellout move, in fact fascisthunter Dec 2012 #27
Every day there is a new one. Every day. woo me with science Dec 2012 #32
"Reefer Sadness" Nevernose Dec 2012 #35
There are SO many other Aerows Dec 2012 #37
Anyone with signatures turned on knows how I feel. CrispyQ Dec 2012 #38
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Stupid - "Administra...