Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

grumpyduck

(6,653 posts)

3. Thank you.

Reply to pat_k (Reply #1)

Sat Sep 7, 2024, 05:41 PM

Sep 2024

I thought about adding a "Depends on the situation" choice, but I figured it would just result in a huge debate about what those situations would be. As it is, choosing "Yes" actually covers special circumstances, as in yes the general public should be able to buy them but there may be special circumstances (permits/etc.) involved.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

12 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Simple question about AR-15s. [View all] grumpyduck Sep 2024 OP

Owning any firearm should require both safety training certificate and license. pat_k Sep 2024 #1

insurance too Skittles Sep 2024 #2

Absolutely. pat_k Sep 2024 #4

Insurance that covers what, exactly? NickB79 Sep 2024 #7

gun humpers should pay more to cover the cost of gun carnage Skittles Sep 2024 #10

Ok, but insurance doesn't accomplish that NickB79 Sep 2024 #11

whatever Skittles Sep 2024 #12

Thank you. grumpyduck Sep 2024 #3

I think the automobile model would be good for starters... Training, license, insurance and renewal after a period. nt mitch96 Sep 2024 #9

Mass shooters would switch to the Ruger Mini-14 or AK-47 style guns Kaleva Sep 2024 #5

I know. grumpyduck Sep 2024 #6

There are pump action AR-15's that wouldn't be covered by any Assault Weapons ban, BTW NickB79 Sep 2024 #8