General Discussion

Eliot Rosewater

(32,313 posts) Thu Sep 12, 2024, 01:48 PM Sep 12

Anyone here doubt this corrupt Supreme Court will rule mail-in ballots invalid? [View all]

When lawsuits are brought in Pennsylvania and Michigan and Ohio and Wisconsin and Arizona and several other places by magats saying that the mail-in ballots are invalid for some ridiculous reason and when at least five of the Supreme Court justices agree by pulling something out of thin air.

Point is maybe if we made it clear now to the Supreme Court that we would consider that a physical attack on the United States maybe they wouldn’t do it.

41 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Anyone here doubt this corrupt Supreme Court will rule mail-in ballots invalid? [View all] Eliot Rosewater Sep 12 OP

Victory by huge margins is necessary and possible. In fact, I think it is likely. rzemanfl Sep 12 #1

Biden could issue an executive Order to the post office to expedite all mail in ballots Captain Zero Sep 12 #31

I doubt it... getagrip_already Sep 12 #36

"This was done to prevent the potus from pressuring or hurting the system." Turns out they can anyway Fullduplexxx Sep 12 #37

Yeah, but the board is supposed to be a watchdog getagrip_already Sep 12 #39

I'd think that by now all States wouldve validated their mail-in laws & rules. oldsoftie Sep 12 #2

Seriously doubt it. trump couldn't even get SC to help him in his election lies and lawsuits. Silent Type Sep 12 #3

Pres. Biden should use his new powers to stop corrupt justices in their tracks... polichick Sep 12 #4

I don't know what he could do about the justices, nothing as far as I know Eliot Rosewater Sep 12 #5

They just gave him the power to do anything. He could demand a... polichick Sep 12 #7

True Eliot Rosewater Sep 12 #8

No they didn't give the power to do "anything" onenote Sep 12 #30

I have virtually no concern ScratchCat Sep 12 #6

They will do a lot of lawless things, but I don't see this. hlthe2b Sep 12 #9

I do not include you in my snarky comment about people who still Eliot Rosewater Sep 12 #11

SCROTUS interference in the election Charging Triceratops Sep 12 #10

There you go, let's say that to anybody who will listen Eliot Rosewater Sep 12 #12

They will not hesitate - it's an end game for them. polichick Sep 12 #14

My point is magats will do the worst imaginable things Eliot Rosewater Sep 12 #23

The Court gave Trump the cold shoulder over 2020 Sympthsical Sep 12 #13

They want to retire, and need a Republican in the WH to do that. polichick Sep 12 #15

I tend to worry about things likely to happen Sympthsical Sep 12 #21

The only thing that will lead to a Republican win is... polichick Sep 12 #25

LOL, If it's TFG in the white house bluestarone Sep 12 #38

That joke would be on them! polichick Sep 12 #40

Hope so, and I hope there's no way for this to be achieved within the court system Eliot Rosewater Sep 12 #16

I do worry about some of the state and local officials Sympthsical Sep 12 #24

Exactly and all you need is a chaotic situation and then a Eliot Rosewater Sep 12 #26

Depends on how close the votes are and who they believe ruling for/against would help. Freethinker65 Sep 12 #17

The two best paragraphs I've read in months Eliot Rosewater Sep 12 #22

I think it would be A Bridge Too Far even for this miserable SC. Ping Tung Sep 12 #18

This joker is going to see the landslide of can't deny and it is only 55 days away, FINALLY! Brainfodder Sep 12 #19

Love it Eliot Rosewater Sep 12 #20

There is a split circuit decision that will get to them before election day getagrip_already Sep 12 #27

That's right, I remember this. So I consider them not counting those ballots Eliot Rosewater Sep 12 #29

Any scotus ruling would likely be national getagrip_already Sep 12 #33

Since you asked, I doubt it. onenote Sep 12 #28

The SC doesn't need Trump Buckeyeblue Sep 12 #32

Because thomas and alito want to retire... getagrip_already Sep 12 #35

Yes. H2O Man Sep 12 #34

An risk getting tarred with trashing the military vote? John Farmer Sep 12 #41