Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Legalizing Sports Gambling Was a Huge Mistake [View all]
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2024/09/legal-sports-gambling-was-mistake/679925/free link: https://archive.ph/CQAW3
Because different states legalized sports gambling at different times, social scientists can compare different measures of well-being in states that did legalize with those that did not, before and after legalization.
Alarming patterns have started to emerge. Two recent working papers look at the economic impacts of legalization. One, by Northwestern Universitys Scott Baker and colleagues, finds that legal sports gambling depletes households savings. Specifically, for every $1 spent on betting, households put $2 less into investment accounts. States see big increases in the risk of overdrafting a bank account or maxing out a credit card. These effects are strongest among already precarious households.
A second paper, from the economists Brett Hollenbeck of UCLA and Poet Larsen and Davide Proserpio of the University of Southern California, tells a similar story. Looking specifically at online sports gambling, they find that legalization increases the risk that a household goes bankrupt by 25 to 30 percent, and increases debt delinquency. These problems seem to concentrate among young men living in low-income countiesfurther evidence that those most hurt by sports gambling are the least well-off.
A third recent paper, from the University of Oregon economists Kyutaro Matsuzawa and Emily Arnesen, shows another, perhaps more surprisingand certainly more harrowingharm of gambling legalization: domestic violence. Earlier research found that an NFL home teams upset loss causes a 10 percent increase in reported incidents of men being violent toward their partner. Matsuzawa and Arnesen extend this, finding that in states where sports betting is legal, the effect is even bigger. They estimate that legal sports betting leads to a roughly 9 percent increase in intimate-partner violence.
Alarming patterns have started to emerge. Two recent working papers look at the economic impacts of legalization. One, by Northwestern Universitys Scott Baker and colleagues, finds that legal sports gambling depletes households savings. Specifically, for every $1 spent on betting, households put $2 less into investment accounts. States see big increases in the risk of overdrafting a bank account or maxing out a credit card. These effects are strongest among already precarious households.
A second paper, from the economists Brett Hollenbeck of UCLA and Poet Larsen and Davide Proserpio of the University of Southern California, tells a similar story. Looking specifically at online sports gambling, they find that legalization increases the risk that a household goes bankrupt by 25 to 30 percent, and increases debt delinquency. These problems seem to concentrate among young men living in low-income countiesfurther evidence that those most hurt by sports gambling are the least well-off.
A third recent paper, from the University of Oregon economists Kyutaro Matsuzawa and Emily Arnesen, shows another, perhaps more surprisingand certainly more harrowingharm of gambling legalization: domestic violence. Earlier research found that an NFL home teams upset loss causes a 10 percent increase in reported incidents of men being violent toward their partner. Matsuzawa and Arnesen extend this, finding that in states where sports betting is legal, the effect is even bigger. They estimate that legal sports betting leads to a roughly 9 percent increase in intimate-partner violence.
112 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
It is not as though there was not sufficient evidence on gambling impact to predict this...
hlthe2b
Sep 23
#3
Hah! I have never heard the term "pokies"... No, Nevada is the exception with them nearly everywhere..
hlthe2b
Sep 25
#111
But they will blame the Democrats and a "bad economy" for not having any spending money
Walleye
Sep 23
#6
I think government should certainly ensure that the food we eat isn't outright poisonous.
thucythucy
Sep 23
#73
I'm sorry you had to witness those injuries, but personal anecdotes generally don't make for good public policy.
thucythucy
Sep 24
#91
I got a bridge to sell you if you think day traders do their thing on a fair playing field.
PeaceWave
Sep 23
#13
Day trading cannot be made illegal. However, educational advertising wouldn't be a bad idea.
PeaceWave
Sep 23
#20
There is already a capital gains penalty for making short term investments. However...
PeaceWave
Sep 23
#58
After reading this the only thing I could do was heave a big sigh. What else can you say?
Biophilic
Sep 23
#16
Pennsylvania Volunteer Fire Halls - famous for running Bingo games with huge payouts
FakeNoose
Sep 23
#45
Sorry. Yeah, my dad was in it big. When he passed away, I got a call from a Las Vegas casino telling me my dad
Silent Type
Sep 23
#48
I know men in their 20s who are highly susceptible for developing gambling addictions.
NCDem47
Sep 23
#54