Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Farmer-Rick

(11,155 posts)
23. It's all those manipulated, faked GOP polls
Thu Oct 24, 2024, 02:06 PM
Thursday

Last edited Thu Oct 24, 2024, 03:45 PM - Edit history (1)

Here's what I read on another post.

It's the best explanation I have seen yet of why the polls are showing a tight race when it's clearly a Harris win.

"This time, because they started earlier and are producing more polls their polls are often only 1-2 points to the right of the polling average or independent polls. They are working the averages more carefully this time, over using the time and volume to move them gradually so the op is not as crude and as easy to see as last time. If Harris leads by 2.5 points and you drop 5 polls showing the race tied or her ahead by 1 or even 2 points the averages moves and it looks like she is losing altitude.

Consider this Tweet from one of the top analysts at 538. It is part of a thread referring to what was a very junky PA poll by TIPP.

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F16f8f964-36e2-4522-a702-7bbb12522595_898x328.png

(I couldn't copy the image but the link will take you to the tweet he's referring to.)

So here is 538 admitting that even something they consider a bad poll could move the average in PA by a tenth of a point. OK, red wave pollsters say, got it. Appreciate the tip! So I just need to produce more polls to move the average by a meaningful amount. Which is what they’ve done. If each of these polls moves the average by a tenth of a point then 16 of them in October in PA could have moved the average by 1.6 points - and poof a Harris lead becomes a tied race.

Elon Musk and primary political patron of JD Vance. Polymarket is buying product placement on sites and with influencers for their 2024 American election results even though NO AMERICAN CAN LEGALLY PARTICIPATE IN PROCESS THAT DETERMINES THE DATA. Polymarket is everywhere. Harry Enten higlights their data on CNN. Right wing influencers pump Polymarket maps showing Trump “winning” everyday. Nate Silver is an advisor to Polymarket. Elon and Twitter of course are pumping this stuff, hard."

https://www.hopiumchronicles.com/p/vp-harris-and-her-campaign-are-working

They are creating a Red Mirage with these manipulated polls. They use-to NOT do sooooo many. Now they do them daily. So the sites that aggregate polling data are very likely very wrong.

If you have a pollster you think is truly honest with no pressure to rig a poll or 2 for the filthy-rich oligarchs, then that is probably your best bet of getting good polling results. I'm sure the Harris campaign has them.

The aggregate sites are too easily manipulated, no matter how well they claim to weigh the polls they put in the mix. That weighing itself is put a slight bias into the polling results.

And ignore the betting sites. If you're rich, dumping money into a betting site to create an appearance of Trump winning is easier than buying pollsters.

Never heard of them but very encouraging analysis Wiz Imp Thursday #1
Hmmm dweller Thursday #2
Polling averages cannot be trusted due to manipulation by corrupt Red Wave pollsters. Nt Fiendish Thingy Thursday #3
Some polling averages exclude partisan polls. CaptainTruth Thursday #18
No major aggregator excludes all Red Wave pollsters Fiendish Thingy Thursday #33
Which is why I ignore major aggregators like the two you mentioned... CaptainTruth Thursday #47
Check out VoteHub. PAMod Thursday #54
This looks more realistic Rstrstx Thursday #57
Graded by who? Fiendish Thingy Thursday #58
Interesting snip: Dennis Donovan Thursday #4
How, exactly, does "noise" differ among the polls? What is "noise?" nt LAS14 Thursday #10
Here's an old article from 2018: Dennis Donovan Thursday #15
Interesting article, but it doesn't tell me what "noise" is.... LAS14 Thursday #19
Well, I'll try cally Thursday #30
Thanks! So if a poll has noise that doesn't necessarily mean a poll is bad, right? nt LAS14 Thursday #48
ALL polls have noise, more or less, so yes, not necessarily bad. . . . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Thursday #50
Yes cally Thursday #56
Voters' intentions form a signal. "Noise" is an engineering term meaning anything corrupting a signal. Bernardo de La Paz Thursday #31
Thanks. nt LAS14 Thursday #49
It's all those manipulated, faked GOP polls Farmer-Rick Thursday #23
yeah, I've seen that. Very curious discrepancy. LymphocyteLover Thursday #42
Also interesting data on split ticket dweller Thursday #5
OMG! I didn't realize Kamala was losing in every swing states on RCP and most on 538. Doodley Thursday #7
It reflects a recent flood of Republican-leaning polls meant to influence the averages. SunSeeker Thursday #21
Yes!!! wolfie001 Thursday #34
Well, I guess that's one way to put your thumb on the scale. calimary Thursday #41
Real Clear Politics is itself a Republican leaning organization. lees1975 Thursday #37
Might be worth looking at Hopium Chronicles By Simon Rosenberg OnDoutside Thursday #52
This is one point I. Very uncertain of -- Robinson is simply soooo terrible that I'm willing to bet LauraInLA Thursday #8
Yes, NC doesn't make sense. In fact, very little of the polling data makes sense. A lot of people are saying Trump is LymphocyteLover Thursday #43
Very interesting GusBob Thursday #6
Are the Vantage number an average, or the results of the latest poll? LAS14 Thursday #9
I'm unclear on this, as well, but they claim they're getting data from 40k responses per state per year with an LauraInLA Thursday #11
Looks to be the latest numbers but MontanaFarmer Thursday #28
I hope they're right. Martin68 Thursday #12
My husband's take: LauraInLA Thursday #13
Apparently this org has arisen from an Entrepreneurial Accelerator Program. LauraInLA Thursday #14
It sounds to me like GusBob Thursday #17
Well, the orange fatso is an insane shitbag so...... wolfie001 Thursday #16
NC will be an interesting case study dsc Thursday #20
Are you telling me that talking about Arnold Palmer's penis is not a winning campaign strategy? Ray Bruns Thursday #22
It's "they're eating the dogs" Farmer-Rick Thursday #24
I guess he's wondering where the geese went - how about Florida. kerry-is-my-prez Thursday #53
No doubt. Trumpy is lurching from major mistake to major mistake. n/t PatrickforB Thursday #26
This is very good information! Thank you. n/t PatrickforB Thursday #25
Never heard of them but it's interesting jgmiller Thursday #27
If these guys have gamed the pollsters, they will be top dog going forward bucolic_frolic Thursday #29
I don't understand Figure 7 Orange Buffoon Thursday #32
I've been doing my own own averages. At least half of the polls are RW. kerry-is-my-prez Thursday #35
Look at their data collection. lees1975 Thursday #36
Hubby and I voted today Katcat Thursday #38
Thanks for this! shotten99 Thursday #39
I don't buy that Harris is behind in AZ. And I don't buy her taking FL. They didn't list WI...seems odd PortTack Thursday #40
Later on in the article Vantage House says Trump unlikely to lose FL crimycarny 12 hrs ago #59
Political polling company Warpy Thursday #44
How did WI get replaced with FL in their list of 7? BWdem4life Thursday #45
Kick Coexist Thursday #46
Noone? Lol.... getagrip_already Thursday #51
It shouldn't be that close in the first place Dem4life1234 Thursday #55
Florida +3.7% for Harris? RidinWithHarris 12 hrs ago #60
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"The Blowout No One Sees ...»Reply #23