Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Early Social Security? [View all]ancianita
(39,039 posts)55. Trump and Vought don't care about no blowback. If you know that, and you know that The People are
not at the White House table, what are you waiting for, a miracle?
You can wait and see and take your chances, but me, I'd play it safe and apply ASAP.
60% of something is better than 100% of nothing.
Up to you. Take care.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
98 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I applied and was approved two months ago, no money this year as I made too much but I quit my
Shellback Squid
Nov 25
#25
I'm seriously considering applying at 62 for the same reason you mentioned....
Think. Again.
Nov 25
#4
Just my thoughts on ACA. I think they may just change the name only and say they improved it...
Joinfortmill
Nov 26
#96
One thing seldom mentioned in these calculations is the cost-of-living adjustment.
Midnight Writer
Nov 25
#10
Yeah, my first COL raised me over the $1K mark. Other years, it's just been a tiny bit, but I'll take it.
mucholderthandirt
Nov 26
#84
Why do you think recipient benefits for current or soon to be recipients will be cut?
WarGamer
Nov 25
#11
Glad that plan worked it out for him, madville. Like I wrote, everybody's health and fate are different.
C0RI0LANUS
Nov 25
#36
If you are still working and cover your spouse, that coverage will remain primary until you retire.
tritsofme
Nov 25
#43
If you can wait until full retirement it will amount to significantly more money, but only if it is 66 not 70, and if
JohnSJ
Nov 25
#45
I wouldn't wait. That's just me. I don't trust that in the next 4 years, those not already in will be let in.
ancianita
Nov 25
#47
Trump and Vought don't care about no blowback. If you know that, and you know that The People are
ancianita
Nov 25
#55
I expect medical costs and local taxes to skyrocket. I'm holding out until age 70.
Auggie
Nov 25
#50
Forgoing 2 years of 3600: 86,400. Breakeven point of 86,400 / 650: 11 years after age 70 age 81, not counting interest.
lostnfound
Nov 26
#74
I took social security at 65, one year before my full retirement benefit at 66.
Joinfortmill
Nov 25
#59
I've been on disability just after my first semester of college, but I don't know if that counts.
sakabatou
Nov 25
#60
Go for it. My husband has worked full time for years while on Social Security.
scarletlib
Nov 26
#80
My brother is eligible in January, and he's debating taking it early. He'd planned to work a few more year.
mucholderthandirt
Nov 26
#82
I retired at 62 14 years ago, I have never regretted that decision for one second. Of course,
doc03
Nov 26
#83
I retired as an "old fart", 68 years old, and started SS when I turned 70
JustABozoOnThisBus
Nov 26
#87
These are the key ages: 62, full retirement age (FRA), year you reach FRA, maximum benefit age (MBA)
discntnt_irny_srcsm
Nov 26
#89