Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Skip Intro

(19,768 posts)
Wed Dec 19, 2012, 12:40 AM Dec 2012

When pondering a solution for gun violence in the US, is "how" or "why" a more important question? [View all]


How - how were the crimes committed? More important to examine what tools were used.

Why - why were the crimes committed? More important to understand circumstance, motivation and psyche of shooter.

Which question would lead to a more effective response?

Or should we look at both areas?


edited to correct typo
5 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited
How. Take away the tools and such crimes diminish.
2 (40%)
Why. Understanding what moves a person to do such things will lead to better prevention measures.
1 (20%)
Both.
2 (40%)
Other.
0 (0%)
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»When pondering a solution...