When pondering a solution for gun violence in the US, is "how" or "why" a more important question? [View all]

[Skip Intro]

How - how were the crimes committed? More important to examine what tools were used.

Why - why were the crimes committed? More important to understand circumstance, motivation and psyche of shooter.

Which question would lead to a more effective response?

Or should we look at both areas?


edited to correct typo

5 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited
	How. Take away the tools and such crimes diminish.
	2 (40%)
	Why. Understanding what moves a person to do such things will lead to better prevention measures.
	1 (20%)
	Both.
	2 (40%)
	Other.
	0 (0%)
	0 DU members did not wish to select any of the options provided.
Show usernames Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll