General Discussion

Agschmid

(28,749 posts)

31. Yavin's Hide.

Reply to ProgressiveProfessor (Reply #14)

Sat Jan 19, 2013, 11:35 AM

Jan 2013

At Sat Jan 19, 2013, 09:25 AM an alert was sent on the following post:

Guns Make You Feel Powerful and Smart
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=2218436

REASON FOR ALERT:

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate. (See <a href="http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=aboutus#communitystandards" target="_blank">Community Standards</a>.)

ALERTER'S COMMENTS:

Violation of the Community Standards.
Deliberately insulting.

It is the responsibility of all DU members to participate on our discussion forums in a manner that promotes a positive atmosphere and encourages good discussions among a diverse community of people holding a broad range of center-to-left viewpoints

JURY RESULTS

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sat Jan 19, 2013, 09:33 AM, and the Jury voted 4-2 to HIDE IT.

Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT and said: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: The person who this post was responding to has been pushing the NRA talking points and insulting those who oppose guns, if he can dish it out he should be able to take it as well.
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT and said: An overly personal, ugly and insulting reply to a post that was well within the realm of DU discussion.
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT and said: PP has a point. I do not know anything about guns. I have had to ask questions to better understand how to restrict. I do not think PP deserves Yavins tear down and personal attacks.
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT and said: Personal attack, voting to hide. I do not agree with the ProgProf most of the time but that reply is not he correct way to show disagreement.

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

38 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

You must remember: What is most important about gun control [View all] Whovian Jan 2013 OP

And yet the distinction between powder tattoos and abrasion rings is lost on them. Robb Jan 2013 #1

Lost on me as well. Whovian Jan 2013 #3

It is? Recursion Jan 2013 #16

As Bob Dylan said Berserker Jan 2013 #2

What I think you need to understand, my friend, is that correct terminology and definitions are key in SayWut Jan 2013 #4

Aren't we lucky you're here to splain this all to us. Squinch Jan 2013 #6

Well, insult aside, from what I've been reading here lately, I might as well go to my SayWut Jan 2013 #9

This Is An On-Line Talk Site. It Is Not A Senate Mark-Up Session. Paladin Jan 2013 #20

You mean instead of "thingie that holds lots o'bullets," call it "that mag thingie"? nt Honeycombe8 Jan 2013 #5

Yes... And They Apparently Don't Understand That There Has Been Gun Control For Many Decades Now... WillyT Jan 2013 #7

Yes you can own a tank. All it takes is the want, and money. oneshooter Jan 2013 #11

Does It Come With All The Machine-Gun Ammunition, And The Cannon Artillery ??? WillyT Jan 2013 #12

Escalating ongoing disputes with the city parking authority? Robb Jan 2013 #13

If you have the proper paperwork in order... OneTenthofOnePercent Jan 2013 #19

If you want something that will go bang, try this. oneshooter Jan 2013 #30

Yes, in fact, people CAN own most of those things. beevul Jan 2013 #17

You can talk about gun control in whatever terms you want, but if you want to write petronius Jan 2013 #8

and that is why our elected legislators have knowledgeable staffs and the committees to which CTyankee Jan 2013 #22

We are not legislators (mostly), but we are discussing what we think policy ought to look like petronius Jan 2013 #34

Well, I probably should know more about many of the finer points on this administration's CTyankee Jan 2013 #35

Well of course the reason for this is that if the folks discussing gun control on DU don't Squinch Jan 2013 #10

heh annabanana Jan 2013 #26

Its a pretty simple chain... ProgressiveProfessor Jan 2013 #14

Get Your Story Straight, Professor. Paladin Jan 2013 #21

It is quite straight ProgressiveProfessor Jan 2013 #32

Lose The Condescension. Paladin Jan 2013 #36

PKB ProgressiveProfessor Jan 2013 #37

Post removed Post removed Jan 2013 #28

Yavin's Hide. Agschmid Jan 2013 #31

Post removed Post removed Jan 2013 #38

It's important not to have "shoulder thing that goes up" moments Recursion Jan 2013 #15

From the responses: Point made. Whovian Jan 2013 #18

Yes indeed etherealtruth Jan 2013 #24

But then again not understanding firearms is what made the AWB nearly useless aikoaiko Jan 2013 #23

The General Public Is Never Going to Have An Encyclopedic Understanding of Firearm Tech Yavin4 Jan 2013 #25

The knowledge is needed by those trying to legislate more than the public in general ProgressiveProfessor Jan 2013 #33

No. But nice try. geckosfeet Jan 2013 #27

I find it interesting Duckhunter935 Jan 2013 #29