General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy believed President Kennedy was killed by a conspiracy. [View all]stopbush
(24,396 posts)You're engaging in a classic diversionary tactic.
O'Neill and Silbert were FBI agents, not forensic pathologists. The skull fragments were turned over to them because they were FBI agents. The fragments were given to them for safe-keeping, not for them to analyze and pass judgment on as qualified, trained pathologists.
Eric Clapton comes off stage and asks a cop to hold onto his guitar for him while he hits the can. That doesn't make the cop a musician who is able to play the guitar. He's just someone to be trusted to not steal the guitar.
I've noticed this pattern with most of your posts in this thread. You cite this or that person who have nothing to do with what's being discussed, like the autopsy orderly saying he didn't see any beveling when the reason he didn't see beveling was because he never saw the skull fragments.
You say Silbert didn't believe the single bullet theory after viewing "the autopsy." But unless that autopsy was that of Gov Connally, what does that even mean? Viewing JFK's autopsy tells only a third of the single bullet story! Without Connally's wounds, the theory amounts to nothing but a second bullet that hit JFK in the back and exited his throat. That's not where the "controversy" lies. The "controversy" lies in 7 wounds the bullet created in two people, not the two wounds it created in JFK.
I'm all for having a discussion/debate, but you've got to do better than this is your positions are to merit consideration.