General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy believed President Kennedy was killed by a conspiracy. [View all]AntiFascist
(12,792 posts)largely based on the testimony of his wife, Marina Oswald. Marina claimed that Oswald, a self-proclaimed Marxist, considered Walker a fascist and "leader of a fascist organization." It's interesting to note that, according to Gen. Walker's wiki, RFK (as attorney general) had Walker committed to a mental institution after he instigated riots related to the acceptance of a black student to a university in Mississippi. Gen. Walker also resigned his commission after being formally admonished by JFK for calling Eleanor Roosevelt and Harry S. Truman "pink" (meaning Communist-leaning).
By no stretch of the imagination could JFK be considered at the same extreme end of the political spectrum as Gen. Walker. According to Marina Oswald, the shooting of Walker was primarilly politically motivated. Marina Oswald more recently told Oprah Winfrey that her husband had nothing but praise for JFK. So, should you be allowed to pick and choose which portions of Marina Oswald's testimony and statements suit your needs? Marina has changed her opinion of her former husband over the years as she now understands his possible involvement with others in infiltrating anti-Castro groups, and acting, as she now claims, as a "double agent". I've already covered this in another post on this thread.
An alleged conspiracy between all of the parties you named is ridiculous and hyperbolic on your part.
Allow me to give an example of an official conspiracy theory, namely the conclusion reached by the HSCA (House Select Committee on Assassainations). Largely in light of the dictablet audio evidence, the HSCA concluded that JFK was assassinated as the result of a conspiracy, while at the same time they reached the conclusion that the CIA as a whole, the SS as a whole, anti-Castro groups as whole, and other groups on the whole, were not responsible. They specifically stated that they did not rule out the possibility that participants or factions of these groups could have been involved in the conspiracy. No doubt you will be quick to point out that the dictabelt evidence has been challenged. Nevertheless, this is a clear example of how an officially sanctioned organization has come to the conclusion of conspiracy, without involving the leadership, or the organizations on the whole, that you cited.