General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy believed President Kennedy was killed by a conspiracy. [View all]stopbush
(24,396 posts)Saying that Wonder Bread is found on store shelves everywhere is a fact, but it's a fact that has no bearing on the JFK case.
Saying this gangster knew that gangster means nothing. Connecting the dots between this and that based entirely on hearsay, or people's reputation as being "a reliable source," or your own incredulity in accepting objective evidence aren't facts.
Neither is it "a fact" to challenge bits and pieces out of the mountain of evidence that proves Oswald's guilt in this case. For instance, you can challenge the importance of NAA testing when it comes to linking CE399 to the fragments found in Connally, but that doesn't change the other evidence that links CE399 to Oswald's rifle to the exclusion of every other weapon in the world. That doesn't chnange the validity of the single-bullet reality. Disputing the NAA results doesn't serve to provide you with a new and different objective piece of evidence that sends the trail of evidence in a different direction.
Like all CTists, you spend time trying to shoot down every single piece of hard evidence in the case. But even if you could somehow shoot down every piece of evidence in the case, you still haven't provided a single new fact to change the verdict.
"He may have," "it could have been," "suppose he" are hardly on the same level of hard evidence as are ballistic tests that link a fired bullet to a single rifle to the exclusion of all other weapons on the planet.
Your terming fantasy as fact doesn't change that.