General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Regarding the meteor crash in Russia... [View all]Silent3
(15,438 posts)Last edited Sun Feb 17, 2013, 06:12 PM - Edit history (1)
...of UFOs like you have (see "Courtier's Reply" -- a common rhetorical dodge), a reason would leap out at me for why people captured supposedly great pictures in the early 90s, but aren't getting lots of great pictures now?
This is not a side issue of why you think that old stuff should be taken more seriously, but a claim that there's something in there that would SPECIFICALLY be germane to the question of why the past twenty years have not produced more frequent, higher quality, and more convincing evidence of UFOs (specifically as alien beings or other non-mundane phenomena)?
Or are you just off on a tangent, basically saying you don't care about the OP question, you think this other supposed "evidence" is something people should pay attention to, regardless of how it applies or doesn't apply to the question at hand?