General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy believed President Kennedy was killed by a conspiracy. [View all]nyquil_man
(1,443 posts)and 2. We have no record of any of them.
Now, that could be interpreted to mean that some or all of those suspicious actors were part of a conspiracy. It could also be interpreted to mean that their suspicious behavior was completely unrelated to the assassination. Or it could be interpreted to mean that they didn't actually exist. I err toward the middle path.
The three tramps are a good example of this. For many years, theories abounded that they were involved in the assassination. It didn't help that their arrest record was nowhere to be found. But in the late eighties, the arrest record was found and revealed that the three tramps really were just three tramps.
Another problem with Craig is that he not only disagrees with the WC account. He disagrees pretty sharply with other witnesses. Craig claims to have seen Lee Harvey Oswald running down the knoll to get into a green Rambler at around 12:40, when other witnesses and physical evidence have Oswald on a bus, at a time when the knoll was still crowded with spectators. Craig's claims as to what he saw on the sixth floor are also contradicted by the other officers present.
Finally, his testimony does nothing to identify someone else shooting.
On a side note: The Dal-Tex is an appealing place to put another shooter solely, I think, because of its proximity to the TSBD. Some of the witness testimony and some of the ballistics can be interpreted to suggest that the shots came from either building. What I would expect to find, though, would be witness testimony pointing clearly to the Dal-Tex the way I find testimony pointing directly to the TSBD. Witnesses seeing a gun, hearing shots fired from inside the building, et cetera.