Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: What if we don't want Hillary Clinton as Democratic candidate? [View all]Renew Deal
(81,897 posts)278. I think you're lost
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
359 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
WRONG!! O'Malley has been one of the best governors this state has ever seen.
Liberal_Stalwart71
Apr 2013
#247
The fact that the right wing media is pushing the "inevitability"meme should tell you something. nt
antigop
Apr 2013
#300
We need to encourage Warren to run and Dean has been unemployed for a while
betterdemsonly
Apr 2013
#3
Obama's position on Social Security does tend to erase one's memory of whatever else he has done.
meti57b
Apr 2013
#275
No, it indicates that messing with Social Security is a *HUGE* wrong-doing and unforgiveable.
meti57b
Apr 2013
#331
Hillary was a Republican as a teen-ager, because she was raised in a GOP stronghold.
MADem
Apr 2013
#177
How funny! I'm really sick of the Clinton supporters who refuse to admit how much damage Clintons
antigop
Apr 2013
#302
NO, it's time for a prez who will stick up for American workers. That ain't Hillary. nt
antigop
Apr 2013
#306
Why do you frame it: a female President? It's what's between the ears that matters, not the legs...
peacebird
Apr 2013
#132
As a woman, I do not give a rats ass what sex the Prez is. I just want the best person on the job.
peacebird
Apr 2013
#182
Your post said "would not Hillary be. The first female president?" So, back at'cha
peacebird
Apr 2013
#344
He's not an austerian. He brought a lot of progressive programs to San Francisco
Cleita
Apr 2013
#36
He actually did what he could in the area considering our glorious governor then,
Cleita
Apr 2013
#51
I have only heard the term from fellow New Dealers, to be honest with you
betterdemsonly
Apr 2013
#194
Uh oh.....you called him HOT!!! That's worse than saying "best looking" after listing a host of
MADem
Apr 2013
#122
They already punished me enough yesterday. Today they will populate my ignore list. n/t
Cleita
Apr 2013
#124
I think they mean the same who keep posting anti-President Obama and Hillary comments
graham4anything
Apr 2013
#33
I don't care but, you do know Elizabeth Warren voted for Reagan don't you?
graham4anything
Apr 2013
#54
actually that is not true. That is an old six degree conspiracy theory long debunked.
graham4anything
Apr 2013
#69
And Elizabeth Warren voted for Bush and Reagan and was a republican til recently
graham4anything
Apr 2013
#76
Yeah, Joe should run, to flank for her and take the VP or SOS and block all others out
graham4anything
Apr 2013
#34
Then find one you like, volunteer and get out the vote for them. What's stopping you?
TeamPooka
Apr 2013
#11
Both Obama and Hillary have supported "free trade", and both of them have supported H-1B outsourcing
cascadiance
Apr 2013
#279
I am sad to think you didn't like Jerry Brown, Bobby Kennedy,Teddy, JFK, Al Gore, FDR & JQ Adams
graham4anything
Apr 2013
#37
"And I feel that supporting a person who became prominent because of their name is anti-democratic"
demwing
Apr 2013
#162
Isn't is just as absurd to deny a candidate based solely on bloodlines...
LanternWaste
Apr 2013
#329
Bennyboy....just a reminder....NO ONE HAS ANNOUNCED, but the "inevitability" meme is alive and well.
antigop
Apr 2013
#40
That's almost two full years from now. We've got a midterm election to deal with first. n/t
winter is coming
Apr 2013
#262
Yep, Obama being corporatist might hurt other decent candidates of color getting to be president...
cascadiance
Apr 2013
#272
For fucks sake get off 4 years from now and focus on electing democrats to LOCAL positions
Drew Richards
Apr 2013
#96
You have to be able to name a progressive who would have a good chance of winning.
Honeycombe8
Apr 2013
#100
You're taking that half sentence out of context. HOWEVER, since we're doing this...
Warren DeMontague
Apr 2013
#212
I provided the link, too. So as someone who -somehow- managed to read and "understand" the comments
Warren DeMontague
Apr 2013
#216
My suggestion would be, support someone else in the primaries who is more to your liking.
Nye Bevan
Apr 2013
#131
Neither party resembles what they were 50 years ago, 100 years ago or 20 years ago.
SleeplessinSoCal
Apr 2013
#188
It's hard, but as I say Republican women - in poltics locally - are fighting the "brotherhood".
SleeplessinSoCal
Apr 2013
#207
Did the "owners of the country" reject Hillary in favor of Obama in 2008? (nt)
Nye Bevan
Apr 2013
#155
Back in 2008 at the very first Democratic Presidential Candidate debate....
Junkdrawer
Apr 2013
#234
I love Hillary. You can bet your sweet patootie I'll be working my ass off for her.
Little Star
Apr 2013
#164
we can't have a progressive candidate when there is no progressive movement that extends beyond the
Douglas Carpenter
Apr 2013
#168
I still think that Edwards was left in to the last minute to siphon real progressive votes away ...
cascadiance
Apr 2013
#274
Polling conspiracies aside, your last sentence nails it in terms of who would run against her?
stevenleser
Apr 2013
#243
I'll support her if she's nominated, but if she hires Bob Shrum again we lose.
Indepatriot
Apr 2013
#246