Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

longship

(40,416 posts)
41. Well played, sir.
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 11:53 PM
Apr 2013

But I still do not render verdicts before a trial. And since they'll not likely move the trial to the the Manistee National Forest, I'll likely not be on the jury panel.

I still object, respectfully, to asking people to render a verdict before a trial.


Thanks for your respectful reply.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Seems you're projecting an outcome from this fair trial. flvegan Apr 2013 #1
IF I were projecting an outcome I would have placed the options in the poll in a different order. Tx4obama Apr 2013 #3
He is innocent until proven guilty... Agnosticsherbet Apr 2013 #2
Keep in mind .... Innocent until proven guilty is how a judge and jury MUST view a suspect Trajan Apr 2013 #24
45 year old version of the guy is much different alcibiades_mystery Apr 2013 #4
I'm not going to hate, but your certainty annoys me. Bicoastal Apr 2013 #20
'for all but the most heinous cases' I know many poeple who'd raise their hand to vote markiv Apr 2013 #21
No hate from me ornotna Apr 2013 #22
i would include this as one of those considered "most heinous" JI7 Apr 2013 #26
Very heinous alcibiades_mystery Apr 2013 #30
i think killing a child makes it irredeemable JI7 Apr 2013 #35
I agree with you. nt Live and Learn Apr 2013 #37
What's good for McVeigh is good for him. MrSlayer Apr 2013 #5
LOL, brilliant logic! n-t Logical Apr 2013 #8
Oh my alcibiades_mystery Apr 2013 #9
McVeigh was better at it. MrSlayer Apr 2013 #13
Fair enough alcibiades_mystery Apr 2013 #15
How sad, death penalty supporters on ths site! n-t Logical Apr 2013 #6
Life without parole, and given to psychological researchers as a guinea pig. backscatter712 Apr 2013 #7
I saw a documentary a few years back that said that no one ever 'studied' Jeffrey Dahmer Tx4obama Apr 2013 #27
+1. Edit: Its even more important here than with Jeffery Dalmer. napoleon_in_rags Apr 2013 #40
That is the only thing that makes any sense. nt hifiguy Apr 2013 #33
This will be a Federal trial. The sentence isn't really flexible. nt DevonRex Apr 2013 #10
Other: You know what's even better than justice for a murdered 8 year old? napoleon_in_rags Apr 2013 #11
I like the way you think n/t Fumesucker Apr 2013 #23
See Comment #27. Tx4obama Apr 2013 #29
Assuming he is found guilty, Blue_In_AK Apr 2013 #12
So your post implies skipping the trial? longship Apr 2013 #14
Huh? It says "After a fair trial..." in the subject line :) n/t Tx4obama Apr 2013 #32
Your poll belies your subject line. longship Apr 2013 #36
I object. And since there's no judge here to rule on the objection that's that ;) n/t Tx4obama Apr 2013 #39
Well played, sir. longship Apr 2013 #41
Assuming guilt, imprisonment until rehabilitation or death. Whichever occurs first. Gravitycollapse Apr 2013 #16
An example of rehabilitation 'gone wrong' on the link below Tx4obama Apr 2013 #42
You can't use that single case as evidence against the possibilities of rehabilitation. Gravitycollapse Apr 2013 #43
He should receive sarisataka Apr 2013 #17
wow. just.... wow. frylock Apr 2013 #18
I would like to see a trial first B2G Apr 2013 #19
The trial is not an afterthought. rug Apr 2013 #25
Even without a trial, he shot at police officers last night, 5 minutes before his capture. Travis_0004 Apr 2013 #47
Gitmo pettypace Apr 2013 #28
Sarcasm? Please tell me this is sarcasm. white_wolf Apr 2013 #54
declared guilty or innocent spanone Apr 2013 #31
A fair trial would include looking at the evidence Spider Jerusalem Apr 2013 #34
If found guilty... Chan790 Apr 2013 #38
What a bizarre question. defacto7 Apr 2013 #44
I think sending a 19 year-old boy who until recently was described by practically everyone as a Douglas Carpenter Apr 2013 #45
I'm surprised this one... StarryNite Apr 2013 #46
Bleeding hearts are like nails on a chalkboard sometimes. nt MOTRDemocrat Apr 2013 #48
Who will write the song for Dzhokhar Tsarnaev ... DreamGypsy Apr 2013 #49
He'll end up at ADX Florence duffyduff Apr 2013 #50
Tough call jessie04 Apr 2013 #51
..any man's death diminishes me, because I am involved in mankind, Tierra_y_Libertad Apr 2013 #52
But then there are some people who start out small, kenny blankenship Apr 2013 #55
A jury should decide guilt or innocence and morningfog Apr 2013 #53
Tentatively found guilty and given life imprisonment treestar Apr 2013 #56
I'm surprised how many people on DU are in favor of the death penalty. TimberValley Apr 2013 #57
Mass. doesnt have the death penalty. Tierra_y_Libertad Apr 2013 #58
But it will be federal court, and Mass laws will not apply. El Fuego Apr 2013 #59
Will it? Tierra_y_Libertad Apr 2013 #62
I think that if the crime is terrorism it has to be federal El Fuego Apr 2013 #63
But, will Mass file it's own charges? Tierra_y_Libertad Apr 2013 #64
That's a good question El Fuego Apr 2013 #66
Federal public defenders have agreed to represent the suspect in the Boston Marathon bombings Tx4obama Apr 2013 #67
I think he's obviously guilty Quantess Apr 2013 #60
i hate the idea of a teen getting life but i see no alternative Liberal_in_LA Apr 2013 #61
death would be too easy marlakay Apr 2013 #65
More than likely he will end up at the Florence Supermax with the other terrorists. Tx4obama Apr 2013 #68
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Poll: After a fair trial ...»Reply #41