Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Number23

(24,544 posts)
153. HOW CAN LIBERALS REACH AMERICANS??
Mon May 6, 2013, 05:58 PM
May 2013

HOW CAN LIBERALS GET MORE PROGRESSIVE CANDIDATES IN OFFICE?

Since the small caps in the OP apparently whizzed by your head as you seem absolutely INVESTED in blaming everything on corporations.

HOW CAN LIBERALS GET MORE PROGRESSIVE CANDIDATES IN OFFICE?

This is the question asked over and over and over again by those us beyond disgusted/exasperated and absolutely repulsed by the shrillness of some of the "liberal" posters here. Besides "holding the president's feet to the fire!1" aka "incessantly criticizing Democrats" no one has anything resembling answer. Which I would dare to say, is the VERY CRUX OF THE FUCKING PROBLEM that alot of Americans have with liberals.

HOW CAN LIBERALS GET MORE PROGRESSIVE CANDIDATES IN OFFICE?

And as for your absolutely astounding comment about "ending homelessness, or SS and Medicare for our seniors, or health care for all children, etc." which is so vague to be almost meaningless, I'll just point out that FDR, the patron saint of GD that so many here seem to spend so much time pleasuring themselves to his memory, got EVERY BIT of the same criticisms that Obama has received, except the left was much more vitriolic and angry with FDR at the time.

FDR got "the New Deal doesn't go far enough" from liberals. Sound familiar?
FDR got "you're too comfy-cozy with bankers" from liberals. Sound familiar?
FDR was accused of "not doing enough for the poor" by liberals. Sound familiar?

He could do no right by the liberal wing during his time and now, hilariously, the man is absolutely lionized by some on the left for the same policies that he was savaged for by the left during his time. It just goes to show that there are people that learn NOTHING from history. Absolutely NOTHING.

And this is to everyone's detriment, in my opinion. It is a crying shame that people who are interested and committed in the greater good and taking care of the less fortunate are also so caught up in being nay-sayers, finger-waggers and constant complainers that they are far more successful in alienating and ostracizing than they have ever, EVER been at affecting lasting change in this country. It is TRULY a damned shame.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Well, between the "lone nuts" and the private plane "accidents," it seems progressives aren't villager May 2013 #1
dingdingdingdingding! n/t mattclearing May 2013 #69
THIS. HughBeaumont May 2013 #100
This message was self-deleted by its author devilgrrl May 2013 #236
I think the assassinations of the '60s broke the left's back deutsey May 2013 #104
So, um, this "COINTELPRO" thing... Kurovski Mar 2014 #268
Because progressives have been too busy attacking insufficiently-progressive fellow-travelers Recursion May 2013 #2
Pretty much. joshcryer May 2013 #25
Nailed it in post #2 Number23 May 2013 #55
Sure seems that way. DCBob May 2013 #64
Absolutely!!!!!!!!! LeftInTX May 2013 #79
Bingo! BlueCaliDem May 2013 #66
This (nt) LostOne4Ever May 2013 #67
There it is. Bobbie Jo May 2013 #71
Actually it's because so many "Dems" have embraced Doctor_J May 2013 #75
It is the very type of disingenuous bullshit that you just posted that pushes so called progressives bluestate10 May 2013 #164
If we abuse traditional Democrats, liberals and progressives enough... AgingAmerican May 2013 #233
Bingo. MotherPetrie May 2013 #251
Exactly.... Historic NY May 2013 #78
That doesnt even make any sense. What have the centrists done but compromise with Republicans? nm rhett o rick May 2013 #84
No, it doesn't make sense. Marr May 2013 #85
What doesn't make sense about what he said? Number23 May 2013 #89
Hurt my feelings? Your giving yourselves way too much credit. Disparaging the left is a game to you. rhett o rick May 2013 #94
I wasn't even talking you. My response was to Mar Number23 May 2013 #98
" your lofty and mostly laughable ideals". Explain which ideals you think are "lofty and laughable." rhett o rick May 2013 #99
Um, looks like you need Bobbie Jo May 2013 #120
Your post is very clearly stated. rhett o rick May 2013 #134
You seem confused Bobbie Jo May 2013 #143
LoL. Whatever. rhett o rick May 2013 #147
Seriously? Bobbie Jo May 2013 #148
When you run out of decent discussion, just start ridiculing. nm rhett o rick May 2013 #149
When you can't admit Bobbie Jo May 2013 #150
Not just wrong. Clueless and wrong. And he knows it. Number23 May 2013 #154
He asked you to elaborate. AgingAmerican May 2013 #203
That poster is doing bad enough without having you as his spokesman Number23 May 2013 #207
No elaboration forthcoming AgingAmerican May 2013 #222
Post removed Post removed May 2013 #225
I don't think it's possible for you to have misread/misunderstood more than you have Number23 May 2013 #156
You will get no answer to this. woo me with science May 2013 #123
I have done this dance dozens of times* and yet to get one response to the question, rhett o rick May 2013 #135
You and the poster you're responding to are symptomatic of exactly the kind of crap Number23 May 2013 #157
It's the same fifteen sycophants every time. Marr May 2013 #234
As you know Bobbie Jo May 2013 #244
Yes, it's a big conspiracy against you and all your friends. Marr May 2013 #245
lol Bobbie Jo May 2013 #246
Now *this* is what we call projection. Marr May 2013 #248
Sorry Bobbie Jo May 2013 #249
Alright then-- I hope your alternate universe is having nice weather today. Marr May 2013 #250
How brave of you. You didn't address her until 10 minutes after she was locked out... Tarheel_Dem May 2013 #253
Oh, god-- you, too now? Marr May 2013 #254
The "trees" are full of you guys. Ask one of them. Tarheel_Dem May 2013 #255
LMAO Bobbie Jo May 2013 #258
I've noticed you BOG-sorts behave like a highschool clique. Marr May 2013 #259
Not that accuracy seems to matter Bobbie Jo May 2013 #260
... Marr May 2013 #261
... Bobbie Jo May 2013 #262
HOW CAN LIBERALS REACH AMERICANS?? Number23 May 2013 #153
Sorry im new here LostOne4Ever May 2013 #175
Right? Bobbie Jo May 2013 #177
Cept no citations AgingAmerican May 2013 #181
The truth will set you free. Or maybe not... Number23 May 2013 #183
And to those who backed & pushed FDR I say thank you. raouldukelives May 2013 #178
"Backing" is the operative word here in your "backing and pushing" phrase Number23 May 2013 #184
Absolute made up nonsense. AgingAmerican May 2013 #180
Why the hell would I make something up that is easily verified by a five second search Number23 May 2013 #182
Revisionist puff pieces AgingAmerican May 2013 #185
Denial is a deep, DEEP thing to come out of... Number23 May 2013 #186
You have offered nothing to back your claims AgingAmerican May 2013 #196
Father Coughin was a LIBERAL Number23 May 2013 #206
Father Coughlin was pro Hitler AgingAmerican May 2013 #221
Oh God. You have lost it. You don't think that there liberals that are anti-Semitic? Number23 May 2013 #223
Naziism/Fascism are the extremes of the right AgingAmerican May 2013 #240
You ask for links LostOne4Ever May 2013 #187
Inigo Montoya! Number23 May 2013 #189
Honestly LostOne4Ever May 2013 #190
You pounce on a figure of speech, but offer no evidence AgingAmerican May 2013 #197
More Confirmation Bias LostOne4Ever May 2013 #219
Nice list of 'liberals' you have there lol AgingAmerican May 2013 #224
Hey, when someone says that a journalist can't be a liberal Number23 May 2013 #226
Agreed LostOne4Ever May 2013 #227
I think that's what they call, in the real world, a hella smackdown!!!! Tarheel_Dem May 2013 #231
I'm really surprised at how many people don't know this part of FDR history. I thought it was Liberal_Stalwart71 May 2013 #264
+1,000 freshwest Mar 2014 #267
There are probably lots of reasons. JDPriestly May 2013 #235
Well, at least one "left-wing" candidate that I know of, Art_from_Ark May 2013 #166
That sucks. Do you think that the "left wing" candidate would have won? Number23 May 2013 #168
The "left-wing" candidate, Bill Halter, forced a run-off in the primary Art_from_Ark May 2013 #170
Sorry I'm just seeing this! Number23 May 2013 #208
Note I put "left-wing" in quotes Art_from_Ark May 2013 #239
Bill Clinton supported Blanche Lincoln, too, and campaigned vigorously for her. Liberal_Stalwart71 May 2013 #265
Exhibit "B" Bobbie Jo May 2013 #93
Exhibit "A" Bobbie Jo May 2013 #92
And since "centrism" is really just another name for a current version of Republincanism villager May 2013 #117
When the Repub Party started to go off the rails, many started to slither under our tent. rhett o rick May 2013 #136
Centrists and moderate-liberals have been responsible for 100% of the progress that has taken bluestate10 May 2013 #165
Ok, so tell me what issues the left espouses that you dont agree with. rhett o rick May 2013 #172
You know, the "lofty and laughable ideals". Marr May 2013 #201
That's a non-sequitur: cprise May 2013 #91
Brilliant!! The Left enjoyed a lot of victories in the 1960's, but when Johnson declared that Liberal_Stalwart71 May 2013 #109
Government was 'taken away' from whites by the civil rights movement cprise May 2013 #241
Good post Fumesucker May 2013 #243
That's the answer. nt sibelian May 2013 #96
dingdingdingdingding! n/t SidDithers May 2013 #102
Exactly. HappyMe May 2013 #108
because the rightist apparatchiks control the apparatus; same reason that for the last 50 years HiPointDem May 2013 #125
It is always easier to blame "them", or use terms that every day people understand, but bluestate10 May 2013 #167
who should i blame but the guilty? and ps: *i'm* an everyday person too. HiPointDem May 2013 #179
Heh! Scurrilous May 2013 #131
Hey! It's not their fault people don't appreciate being "corrected" Warren DeMontague May 2013 #133
Yep. Losing sight of the REAL problem. CakeGrrl May 2013 #242
Rhetoric. jazzimov May 2013 #3
I agree very much with this... nenagh May 2013 #106
I sometimes wonder if we're too late. The media is now controlled by corporations. Even the local Liberal_Stalwart71 May 2013 #111
If they had the same access to money... burnodo May 2013 #4
And the media. truebluegreen May 2013 #14
There's a reason they don't. The people who shell out the most $$ for elections winter is coming May 2013 #77
In the long path of human beings, money over the longterm has never beaten conviction and bluestate10 May 2013 #169
Who claimed that money surely wins? burnodo May 2013 #176
Like who? geckosfeet May 2013 #5
We have the DEM Party fighting against us, too. It's not just the GOP, y'know. blkmusclmachine May 2013 #6
So, The Dem party is stopping you from talking to your fellow Americans Yavin4 May 2013 #10
Reason and logic have no place in this country anymore. Brigid May 2013 #21
Yes, our access to national platforms is exactly the same as any pro-corporate politicians is! villager May 2013 #30
No, the Democratic Party is stopping him from having progressive candidates for whom to vote. Egalitarian Thug May 2013 #247
We have in CA. Starry Messenger May 2013 #7
That's One State. There are Others Yavin4 May 2013 #8
One of the largest-just saying, it's not some pipe dream. Starry Messenger May 2013 #11
Congrats on that, but it's still not enough Yavin4 May 2013 #13
Why ask then? Starry Messenger May 2013 #17
The OP is from Canada Rex May 2013 #28
I thought he lived in New York for some reason. Starry Messenger May 2013 #40
He does, that was evidently another person with the same name on DU2. Rex May 2013 #44
I think that it is the suggestion that they are lazy treestar May 2013 #50
Well, we've asked the OP what he is doing. So far, crickets. Starry Messenger May 2013 #52
None of us can prove anything here other than that we post on DU treestar May 2013 #57
Well, then this seems more like a meta OP. Starry Messenger May 2013 #60
I "slammed" people? All I did was ask a question. Yavin4 May 2013 #140
If you'd actually been interested in answers to that, we could have discussed it. Starry Messenger May 2013 #144
Those are all your own interpretations Yavin4 May 2013 #145
And that seems enough for many: You aren't a prog if I don't see posts in "______." Eleanors38 May 2013 #110
Did I use the term "lazy" in my OP? n/t Yavin4 May 2013 #139
Oregon provides you with 2 Democratic Senators, 4 out of 5 House members Bluenorthwest May 2013 #29
I'm from NY Yavin4 May 2013 #32
It's because the Democratic Party sold its soul to Wall Street decades ago. alarimer May 2013 #9
Ding Ding Ding! We have a winner. nt truebluegreen May 2013 #15
This is what I would say also...... socialist_n_TN May 2013 #65
Progressives generally don't get party backing and funding in America. leveymg May 2013 #12
Why do you need funding to convince your fellow Americans to vote for progressives? Yavin4 May 2013 #16
That was then, this is now. Rex May 2013 #24
They weren't up for voting for they were busying working to get legislation passed KoKo May 2013 #80
Because the Party doesn't support True Progressives when they have a Blue Dog KoKo May 2013 #82
that depends on the district tabbycat31 May 2013 #19
This is all the more reason to run as a Blue Dog... joshcryer May 2013 #26
that could be a possibility tabbycat31 May 2013 #38
So did your candidates win or lose? Bluenorthwest May 2013 #45
I'm batting 500 tabbycat31 May 2013 #49
Why is that a bad thing? Occulus May 2013 #63
Last week, I told the story of Representative Donna Edwards. For years she ran against a Blue Dog Liberal_Stalwart71 May 2013 #112
So of the 4 Blue Doggy Dogs you have worked for how many have won? Bluenorthwest May 2013 #41
2 tabbycat31 May 2013 #48
they do Enrique May 2013 #18
It boils down to race, and profit matt819 May 2013 #20
AMEN!! RACE has always been the undergird of American politics. We see this today Liberal_Stalwart71 May 2013 #113
this is so simplistic cali May 2013 #22
Because America votes for whoever the PTB decides will run for office. Rex May 2013 #23
So, Based on most of the posts on my thread, it's a lost cause Yavin4 May 2013 #27
No you are skipping over the reason and cherry picking your result. Rex May 2013 #31
I dunno. I'm not from Canada. n/t Yavin4 May 2013 #34
My apologies then, it must have been another Yavin on DU2 Rex May 2013 #37
Then where are you from, because you speak of Americans as if we were separate from precious Bluenorthwest May 2013 #43
You do. treestar May 2013 #47
It costs money to buy air time. Octafish May 2013 #33
So, there's no hope then. Yavin4 May 2013 #36
It is about money, do you understand that? Rex May 2013 #39
If enough Americans were persuaded they could donate the money treestar May 2013 #46
There are a few here trying to define it as 'there is nothing we can do' Rex May 2013 #51
They complain of being hated, but the reason is they are the ones treestar May 2013 #53
The GOP is lucky that the other party likes to hate on itself. Rex May 2013 #56
The reality is that things are getting worse consistently for the last 40 years for the 99%. rhett o rick May 2013 #161
Edit-- responded to the wrong post. Marr May 2013 #86
Honestly, we liberals need to stop bashing center-left or moderately liberal Democrats. Liberal_Stalwart71 May 2013 #114
+1 Jamaal510 May 2013 #217
There's always hope. We can use the Internets and the public spaces of our communities. Octafish May 2013 #42
It's not that there's no hope... Hippo_Tron May 2013 #61
Because they are shut out of the American propaganda machine. LWolf May 2013 #35
There is truth in this ^^^ Eleanors38 May 2013 #116
True - how often do you see a true liberal on the Sunday morning talk shows? NewJeffCT May 2013 #132
on many social issues incredible advancements have been made. But on economic issues things have Douglas Carpenter May 2013 #54
the left havent whored themselves like the center or right Rise Rebel Resist May 2013 #58
Because we don't have a lot of money Hippo_Tron May 2013 #59
Corporations control the major media? limpyhobbler May 2013 #62
+100 did not watch the videos but corporate media plays ... slipslidingaway May 2013 #68
Six corporations control 98% of the media nadinbrzezinski May 2013 #70
Things aren't bad enough yet steve2470 May 2013 #72
We need to be a Liberal Stalwart like your brother and NEVER give up! The wingnuts never give up! Liberal_Stalwart71 May 2013 #115
Your brother is probably right. As long as the hologram of prosperity (cheap consumer goods) Eleanors38 May 2013 #118
Co-opted by the "Not as Bad" party with the issues watered down to useless. Tierra_y_Libertad May 2013 #73
No media access Doctor_J May 2013 #74
because they are conditioned to like flash over substance Skittles May 2013 #76
'Cause the American Left Dyedinthewoolliberal May 2013 #81
"Well done is better than well said" - Ben Franklin MannyGoldstein May 2013 #83
The Progressive Caucus is the largest in Washington. HooptieWagon May 2013 #87
A great question but I think you need to take it one step at a time. hughee99 May 2013 #88
Over 18,000 posts and you don't know? Really? nt Zorra May 2013 #90
Suiciding, accidenting, overdosing, Reserve Army of Lone Gunmen, & Media Fear n' Disruption machine dogknob May 2013 #95
It sounds like you accept the notion that we have a far right party and a center right party. Marr May 2013 #97
Well, for this post anyway. Third Way messaging demands the same sort of mental contortions woo me with science May 2013 #122
Exactly-- shifting excuses. Marr May 2013 #126
That's your interpretation of what I asked Yavin4 May 2013 #142
It naturally follows from your point. /nt Marr May 2013 #202
Everyone with money and power scales centrist to batshit-insane right wing-ding. HughBeaumont May 2013 #101
It is the money, honey. djean111 May 2013 #103
+10000 YoungDemCA May 2013 #257
I agree! We have failed miserably in terms of messaging. And when we lose battles we tend to Liberal_Stalwart71 May 2013 #105
THREAD. WINNER. Thank you for your HONESTY. Number23 May 2013 #162
But you think the goals of liberals are "lofty and laughable". Marr May 2013 #204
Oh, so you DID see my post to you! Number23 May 2013 #209
You act like you think you posted some kind of clever argument. Marr May 2013 #212
And you act as though you've posted something honest or even remotely relevant Number23 May 2013 #215
^^^^ This!!! ^^^^ Tarheel_Dem May 2013 #263
nanny-statism Puzzledtraveller May 2013 #107
AKA corporate welfare AgingAmerican May 2013 #200
Let Me Guess.....CUZ OBAMA!!!!!!! Skraxx May 2013 #119
The whiny center-right AgingAmerican May 2013 #199
What snide, disingenuous Third Way propaganda this is. woo me with science May 2013 #121
Well and truly said. Thank you. (n/t) djean111 May 2013 #124
I have a question for you. Yavin4 May 2013 #127
Could it be a little of this, a little of that? limpyhobbler May 2013 #129
Unfortunately, skilled, smooth talking, charismatic corporate sponsored politicians Zorra May 2013 #130
So, the people are "too gullible" to see through the mass media Yavin4 May 2013 #138
Yes, you have that correct. The system is controlled by wealthy private interests. Zorra May 2013 #174
AWESOME questions. AWESOME Number23 May 2013 #160
*snap* ~ Thread win. You are awesome real, woo. Zorra May 2013 #128
Bravo! Bravo! You have totally and awesomely hit the nail on the head! scarletwoman May 2013 #159
The mainstream party sabotages them, and the corporate press and media deny them publicity Lydia Leftcoast May 2013 #137
Okay. How does the Left counter that then? Yavin4 May 2013 #141
Guerrilla marketing Lydia Leftcoast May 2013 #173
Weak candidates. morningfog May 2013 #146
Gerrymandering dem in texas May 2013 #151
The silly protesters taking down LBJ gave us everything bad and in fact,made the war go on longer graham4anything May 2013 #152
The "American left" is not blameless... kentuck May 2013 #155
Too much emphasis on gun control derby378 May 2013 #158
Because...... Hotler May 2013 #163
Because it takes some intelligence to vote for progressive candidates. Zoeisright May 2013 #171
Yeah! Stupid Voters! That's a good way to appeal to 45% of the electorate! brooklynite May 2013 #192
It's time for truth. Conservatives and conservatism are bad for children. Zorra May 2013 #198
Those people who represent today's political Right are not true conservatives. Jamaal510 May 2013 #218
But who is/was a true conservative? Strom Thurmond? Ronald Reagan? Jesse Helms? Zorra May 2013 #220
It's the old Adlai Stevenson joke Nevernose May 2013 #228
there is no organized american left. there's a bunch of front groups associated with the demo- HiPointDem May 2013 #188
...because Americans aren't, by and large, progressive. brooklynite May 2013 #191
That requires a sustained effort that offers people positive choices using positive language. stevenleser May 2013 #193
IOW, We Have To Be More Likeable. If people don't like you, then they turn off to you. Yavin4 May 2013 #194
Not exactly. The message has to be a positive one, not necessarily the folks saying it. stevenleser May 2013 #195
Very nicely said, Steven. And as has been pointed out, Exhibits A-Z of exactly what Number23 May 2013 #211
Because the AMERICAN RIGHT owns the media. Atman May 2013 #205
We're too busy talking down to red states Prism May 2013 #210
all politicians want to win. All politicians are convinced their constituents are far more librechik May 2013 #213
Two reasons, I think Spike89 May 2013 #214
The responses to this thread have been illuminating. Thanks for posting it Number23 May 2013 #216
Thank you, my love. You ain't too shabby yourself!! Liberal_Stalwart71 May 2013 #266
Most people don't believe anything unless Warpy May 2013 #229
I also agree this was a great thread. LeftInTX May 2013 #230
Because racism trumps everything. nt aaaaaa5a May 2013 #232
The average opinion of those on the right fujiyama May 2013 #237
THE PROGRESSIVE CAUCUS IS THE LARGEST DEM CAUCUS IN CONGRESS! grahamhgreen May 2013 #238
It is the Democratic party that has the most say on who runs. Agnosticsherbet May 2013 #252
A better question would be: Why has the Democratic Party attacked, bullied, mocked, and ridiculed... YoungDemCA May 2013 #256
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why Hasn't The American L...»Reply #153