Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

calimary

(81,560 posts)
23. That's a good one!
Tue May 7, 2013, 04:57 AM
May 2013

George W. Bush always catches a break. Now it's grade inflation.

Seriously. I'm gonna be 60 in a couple of weeks. I can remember back a few Presidents. dubya was worse than the worst. He was reagan times about 15. Somehow he had an appeal that helped anesthetize much of America to just how foul his time of presiding was.

I'm sitting here trying to think back on the various odiferous types who lurked behind the curtain in other really freakshow Presidencies. Because with ALL administrations, it's not just the President you send into office. It's all the people he's bringing in with him, or whom he plans to appoint or nominate for something. That part is key.

nixon and reagan come to mind. haldeman, ehrlichman, john mitchell, charles colson, all these fiends during the nixon era, plus the Watergate Burglars. For reagan it was john poindexter, oliver north, elliott abrams, caspar weinberger, and more. It was Criminality on Parade with both their regimes. But maybe what makes them NOT the worst was that, back in those days, there was enough strength among the opposition to contain at least some of the shit that came out, and the shitters responsible for it. And back then we had a vigorous, muckraking, and impartial news media bent on telling the truth regardless whether it generated profits or furthered an agenda. At least back in nixon's day, a whole bunch of his scheming conniving little cabal wound up ousted from their jobs, facing charges and in numerous cases, federal prison. reagan's administration was epically criminal, record-setting at that:

The presidency of Ronald Reagan in the United States was marked by multiple scandals, resulting in the investigation, indictment, or conviction of over 138 administration officials, the largest number for any US president.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reagan_administration_scandals

At least some people were held accountable, even if reagan himself escaped impeachment over the Iran/Contra Affair. And of course, we all know what happened with richard Nixon, the first time a President actually had to pay in full for the bad things he did. But dubya's? None. Well - one. scooter libby. Who btw still walks free to this day and uncontrite. He's never seen a day at a federal penitentiary, even one of those "Club Fed" types where white collar criminals go for their timeouts. And in dubya's den, there are actual war criminals. Plus one who many honestly and soberly describe as evil. ALL THE MALFEASANCE of the bush/cheney years, and not one individual has had to face any music except for that from some local orchestra playing them onstage at yet another speaking engagement along the "mashed-potato circuit".

None of these schmucks in bush/cheney & co. has had to pay a price for what he/she did.
F's straight down the line from me. nt Hissyspit May 2013 #1
This from the comments section BainsBane May 2013 #5
That's a good one! calimary May 2013 #23
I hope history will be kind to this POTUS. secondwind May 2013 #26
I hope history will let the chips fall where they may, frankly. WinkyDink May 2013 #33
"somehow he had an appeal"? unblock May 2013 #30
I don't understand the appeal, either! You and I - and most clear-headed people who are grounded in calimary May 2013 #44
he will get more unpopular as time passes JI7 May 2013 #2
I think that depends who follows BainsBane May 2013 #3
Good they're not rewriting history. Cha May 2013 #4
I thought GWB was a moron from the get go jambo101 May 2013 #6
without term limits BainsBane May 2013 #7
that is one awful headline. cali May 2013 #8
I see your point BainsBane May 2013 #9
oh yeah, I know. I wasn't suggesting you made it up cali May 2013 #20
A D+ for integrity? Art_from_Ark May 2013 #10
It's an average of 68 ratings BainsBane May 2013 #11
I would say that that grade, at least, Art_from_Ark May 2013 #13
Well, he did cling to being wrong about everything no matter what the facts were. Warpy May 2013 #19
i hope that the criminals who enabled the smirking chimp see some justice olddots May 2013 #12
His was, to put it mildly, a clusterfuck of a Presidency. Warren DeMontague May 2013 #14
That is probably the one thing BainsBane May 2013 #17
He was a uniter, not a divider. Warren DeMontague May 2013 #18
If going down in history was his goal, then... pinboy3niner May 2013 #15
fubar MFM008 May 2013 #16
"Failure" is too generous Ron Obvious May 2013 #21
WTF? LostOne4Ever May 2013 #22
grade inflation BainsBane May 2013 #40
Considering this was the 1st time the Supreme Court Picked the President fasttense May 2013 #24
Historians Still Despise McMonkey? Unknown Beatle May 2013 #25
I hope history will be kind to this POTUS. secondwind May 2013 #27
And you're saying this twice because? WinkyDink May 2013 #34
This country still hasn't recovered from Bush cabal, and I wonder if it ever will. spicegal May 2013 #28
No, we shan't, and the disaster precedes 43 AND 41. WinkyDink May 2013 #35
I agree deutsey May 2013 #38
The lone option Half-Century Man May 2013 #29
But Bush still gets the last laugh. He gets to enjoy retirement while his successor MotherPetrie May 2013 #31
I don't think "despise" is the correct word for historians. That they see him and his deeds with WinkyDink May 2013 #32
Few historians believe in "objectivity" BainsBane May 2013 #39
Oh, that's obviously a bunch of librul commie soshalust historians. tanyev May 2013 #36
Pffftt. You don't need a Historian to know this. Daniel537 May 2013 #37
And? Safetykitten May 2013 #41
When enough time has passed for the ruinous impact of junior's reign to be fully assessed, indepat May 2013 #42
I think the D- on national security was generous Samantha May 2013 #43
Is there anyone out there delusional enough to think Bush was not an incompetent boob? Buzz Clik May 2013 #45
"Despise," or more accurately assess? Greybnk48 May 2013 #46
I agree the headline is problematic BainsBane May 2013 #47
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Historians Still Despise ...»Reply #23