Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

H2O Man

(73,559 posts)
Wed May 15, 2013, 12:05 AM May 2013

Amendment 1 [View all]

Perhaps it is too obvious, and thus easily overlooked: the reason the "Founding Fathers" added the Bill of Rights to the U.S, Constitution was to insure that citizens would enjoy specific rights that "government" -- meaning individual and group interests of those in power -- might otherwise seek to deny them.

The most important of these rights, in my opinion, are those found in Amendment 1. These rights are not always popular when exercised. More, there have long been limitations on some of them. For example, citizens do have the right to gather in public to air their disagreements with government policy. But, as the landmark case, decided by the US Supreme Court regarding Martin Luther King, Jr., in Birmingham, that right is not absolute.

In recent history, beginning with the Kennedy administration during the final preparations for the foolish Bay of Pigs invasion, there has been tension between the executive branch and the press. Such tensions have also been found in the legislative and the judicial branch, in relations with the press. But, by their very natures, it has always been and will always be the executive branch that has the greater agenda to "control" the media -- either by creating a cozy relationship, or by way of seeking to restrict a free press.

Anyone old enough to have lived through the Nixon era, with its "enemies list" that included several journalists, should know this. And anyone born later, who cares about the Bill of Rights, should invest the time to learn about that toxic time.

The media is not the same today, as it was 40 or 50 years ago. Clearly, there is a corporate media today, that tends to spoonfeed some accurate information, along with heaping amounts of misinformation and disinformation, to an often unsuspecting public. Still, the media of yesteryear was not often as cutting edge as many recall it as being. The truth about Woodward and Bertsein, for example, was far different than the quasi-mythological "All the President's Men."

There were wonderful "underground" newspapers then, and some outrageously good radio shows. "Laugh-In" was often more on target than the 6 o'clock news. But today, we have the internet, something the hippies and YIPPIES! couldn't have dreamed of.
A free press can only be as good -- and free -- as citizens make it. And that includes the realatively minor internet discussion sites, such as the Democratic Underground, as well as blogs by hundreds of grass roots activists.

A big part of making the media -- both corporate and social -- of value, and to infuse the power that Amendment 1 intends, is to always question each and every government infringement on the press. It is easy for the people here to be angered by a Nixon or a Cheney when they attempt to control or restrict the media -- as it well should be. But we do have a responsibility to question those democratic administrations -- even if we really like a President Clinton or a President Obama -- when their administrations engage in actions that could threaten any part of that Bill of Rights.

Too often, if the rabid republicans, who are the lowest life form on earth, are for something, good and sincere Democrats are automatically against it; or, if those rabid republicans are against something, good and sincere Democrats are for it. This type of reaction can, at times, keep us from thinking for ourselves. And the truth is that while both Clinton and Obama are good men, and certainly far better presidents than Bush et al, they are not perfect. Indeed, the very office they hold requires that U.S. Presidents advocate for corporate interests, which includes that military-industrial complex.

If our nation is ever to regain its status as a Constitutional Democracy (and those who will argue that we were never a democracy, but rather a republic can only argue, because they are too misinformed to speak rationally), it will only be because citizens exercise the muscles found in that Bill of Rights -- and I'm definitely not including old #2.

Always question the government. Anyone who fails to do so not only betrays themselves, they betray everyone else.

Peace,
H2O Man

27 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Amendment 1 [View all] H2O Man May 2013 OP
You have made the reason for the First Amendment perfectly clear. Octafish May 2013 #1
Thank you! H2O Man May 2013 #4
Husband and I are working reporters nadinbrzezinski May 2013 #2
I can understand H2O Man May 2013 #10
Yup nadinbrzezinski May 2013 #11
Thank you. Skidmore May 2013 #25
this ness was self-repleted by its awful H2O Man May 2013 #3
all true and prescient bigtree May 2013 #5
Right H2O Man May 2013 #12
Thanks for a great post! Puzzledtraveller May 2013 #6
Thank you. H2O Man May 2013 #19
Does anyone know the background of the Fourteenth Amendment? Baitball Blogger May 2013 #7
Perhaps if you "google" it, H2O Man May 2013 #21
Ouch. Baitball Blogger May 2013 #23
well said! G_j May 2013 #8
Very important point. H2O Man May 2013 #22
Excellently written as always. The only reason imo, that bad policies remain policies, or are sabrina 1 May 2013 #9
Well said. nt woo me with science May 2013 #17
kick G_j May 2013 #13
"No government ought to be without censors, and where the press is free, no one ever will. Tierra_y_Libertad May 2013 #14
K&R woo me with science May 2013 #15
kick woo me with science May 2013 #16
Great minds think alike. Just posted about Nixon's 'enemies list'. trof May 2013 #18
YES! K&R! KoKo May 2013 #20
Nicely done. coeur_de_lion May 2013 #24
Thanks. H2O Man May 2013 #26
don't add 40 years coeur_de_lion May 2013 #27
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Amendment 1