Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
8. You call BS? Maybe the figure is wrong. Maybe it's only 849,000 people. You dont know. PERIOD!!
Thu Jun 27, 2013, 10:14 AM
Jun 2013

You act as if you know for sure. Dead certainty is not a good trait and especially for a "politically liberal" person. PERIOD!!

Besides you are arguing about a number and not the point. We will have to guess at your point. You appear to think that information about our spy programs is secure. It would certainly be nice if that were true. But since Snowden expose, it is obvious that there are some major problems. I bet lots of people have access to the facts that we have spy programs. In fact Booz Allen is helping the Arab Emirates duplicate our programs. They probably have a brochure.

The breach of security by Snowden proves that our secrets are not secure. Where was his supervisor? Why arent we questioning him/her? Are you so certain that someone hasnt gotten the information that Snowden obtained and quietly provided it to other countries?

The 1% want to keep the government spying under wraps, the Corp-Media wants to keep the government spying secret, the REpublicans want to keep the spying secret, and some that post here in DU also want to persecute Snowden and distract from the illegal spying. Strange bedfellows.

How many people do you think are involved? (nt) Recursion Jun 2013 #1
I saw 850,000 "analysts", many privatized, wading through the data in the UK press. bemildred Jun 2013 #2
What "data"? All of it? I call BS on that. Recursion Jun 2013 #3
Here: bemildred Jun 2013 #4
UK has never had a 4th amendment or anything like it Recursion Jun 2013 #5
Yes, it is different, and I don't claim to know much about that, but bemildred Jun 2013 #7
You call BS? Maybe the figure is wrong. Maybe it's only 849,000 people. You dont know. PERIOD!! rhett o rick Jun 2013 #8
And since most of it is now handled by Private Security Corporations, we have no idea how much sabrina 1 Jun 2013 #9
Well yeah, there are some other issues like that too. bemildred Jun 2013 #11
I can I agree I don't like the implementation of the program, it's a waste IMHO. That's it... uponit7771 Jun 2013 #6
Good gwad marions ghost Jun 2013 #12
link and quote please uponit7771 Jun 2013 #13
Been enough of those to sink the marions ghost Jun 2013 #15
I don't live on DU, do you have a link and quote of this ? regards uponit7771 Jun 2013 #18
You may need to do some research marions ghost Jun 2013 #20
Why are we required to agree on that? treestar Jun 2013 #10
This I would agree with. Chan790 Jun 2013 #14
Yeah we just need more Bots marions ghost Jun 2013 #16
I'm not talking about his conscience or bots. Chan790 Jun 2013 #17
So do some personality tests marions ghost Jun 2013 #19
You scare me. Chan790 Jun 2013 #21
If you think the problem here is better "vetting"-- marions ghost Jun 2013 #22
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Both supporters and oppon...»Reply #8