Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Chan790

(20,176 posts)
17. I'm not talking about his conscience or bots.
Thu Jun 27, 2013, 12:59 PM
Jun 2013

If you went back and read what I wrote...what I actually accused him of is being just like his peers, many of whom would sell state secrets for a $40 steak, some cash and an afternoon with a high-rent call-girl. Someone with substantially less conscience than you're giving him credit for.

I'm arguing he's the exact kind of conscience-less bot we already have too many of...most aren't disclosing NSA spying programs, they're gossiping about their confidential work at Madam's Organ in order to impress and fuck a Georgetown undergrad.

It's happening because we're not sufficiently vetting applicants for clearances...he embellished his qualifications and resume. That alone should have come out in even the most-perfunctory vetting and permanently-barred him.

He's not special or unique...he's par for the course and higher-profile.

How many people do you think are involved? (nt) Recursion Jun 2013 #1
I saw 850,000 "analysts", many privatized, wading through the data in the UK press. bemildred Jun 2013 #2
What "data"? All of it? I call BS on that. Recursion Jun 2013 #3
Here: bemildred Jun 2013 #4
UK has never had a 4th amendment or anything like it Recursion Jun 2013 #5
Yes, it is different, and I don't claim to know much about that, but bemildred Jun 2013 #7
You call BS? Maybe the figure is wrong. Maybe it's only 849,000 people. You dont know. PERIOD!! rhett o rick Jun 2013 #8
And since most of it is now handled by Private Security Corporations, we have no idea how much sabrina 1 Jun 2013 #9
Well yeah, there are some other issues like that too. bemildred Jun 2013 #11
I can I agree I don't like the implementation of the program, it's a waste IMHO. That's it... uponit7771 Jun 2013 #6
Good gwad marions ghost Jun 2013 #12
link and quote please uponit7771 Jun 2013 #13
Been enough of those to sink the marions ghost Jun 2013 #15
I don't live on DU, do you have a link and quote of this ? regards uponit7771 Jun 2013 #18
You may need to do some research marions ghost Jun 2013 #20
Why are we required to agree on that? treestar Jun 2013 #10
This I would agree with. Chan790 Jun 2013 #14
Yeah we just need more Bots marions ghost Jun 2013 #16
I'm not talking about his conscience or bots. Chan790 Jun 2013 #17
So do some personality tests marions ghost Jun 2013 #19
You scare me. Chan790 Jun 2013 #21
If you think the problem here is better "vetting"-- marions ghost Jun 2013 #22
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Both supporters and oppon...»Reply #17