Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

NoOneMan

(4,795 posts)
10. "it will ultimately serve our common interest"
Thu Jun 27, 2013, 01:11 PM
Jun 2013

Maybe. Maybe it will rather be leveraged to maximize ROI for police, by identifying the most profitable people to quickly ticket/arrest while ignoring larger offenders that may result in lengthy chases or troublesome trials. Technology such as this can--If one wished--be used to instantly flag the poor who have expired tags, parking tickets, or other outstandings who cannot afford legal representation and who will not resist arrest. In doing so, it can greatly increase the revenue a department can generate on 8 hours of an officers time, as well as avoid risk to officers or liabilities to departments (those who can afford representation).

Its a large assumption to assume instantly that massive surveillance will always and forever serve the common interest. It will serve the variable interests of the people employing it, which will change over time.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»License-plate readers let...»Reply #10