Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DinahMoeHum

(21,786 posts)
10. Any lawyers here? Might there be a prosecution case here for jury misconduct?. . .
Thu Jul 18, 2013, 10:00 AM
Jul 2013

. . .or even perjury regarding "Juror B-37"?

http://sync.democraticunderground.com/10023272343

http://www.esquire.com/blogs/politics/A_Juror_Speaks_Her_Mind

If you click on the Esquire link and scroll down/click on the Comments, a certain "Larry Crofford" offers some interesting food for thought:

(snip)
How in the hell did juror B-37, who once held a gun carry permit, get on that jury? People who are not cops or in the military who carry concealed weapons have at least a tiny bit of paranoia in their personalities, i.e., they fear some act of criminal violence could befall them at any moment, and probably buy into certain prejudices against the black people. Vigorous probing during voir dire might have brought her fears and prejudices to light. And were any of the potential jurors asked whether they hoped to get a book deal out of their experience? A not guilty verdict would surely be worth more money for a book than a conviction.
(snip)
I spent 30 years trying serious felonies, 7 as a defense attorney and 23 as a prosecutor, and never had the chance to try a so-called "trial of the century", but I do believe the hope of landing a book deal should be an automatic disqualifier. That's a potential financial interest in the outcome of a case. Once, several years ago, I did have a non-expert witness on the stand who in a non-responsive answer to a question opine that the victim would not have had gunshot residue on his hands because he probably had washed them before going to the police. She admitted that she had no forensic science training, but she did watch CSI on TV. TV viewing habits made it into my voir dire in every frickin' case after that.
(snip)
I've got to wonder why she changed her mind. In some states, not mine, juror misconduct can result in mistrial even after a verdict has been rendered. In my state only the defense can challenge a verdict based on misconduct. Arguably, given her rush to find a book deal, juror B37 may have had a financial interest in getting on that jury. That's a no-no.
(snip)


Just askin'. If any of you DUers are lawyers, I'd appreciate some feedback. Thanks.

She's also vague about exactly how the relationship with literary agent ended... NYC_SKP Jul 2013 #1
I suppose she has the right to publish the book. But, she won't razorman Jul 2013 #26
my guess is she's waiting for the dust to settle. ejpoeta Jul 2013 #2
I still can't John2 Jul 2013 #11
I still cant get over the afection in her tone of voice when she said "George" darkangel218 Jul 2013 #3
Sounded like she was talking about her own son, didn't it? Chiyo-chichi Jul 2013 #17
Yes!! darkangel218 Jul 2013 #18
I've said it before. I hope they do write it. Baitball Blogger Jul 2013 #4
How would it help the DOJ? n/t Skwmom Jul 2013 #6
If they are looking for flaws in the case, Baitball Blogger Jul 2013 #15
The DOJ marions ghost Jul 2013 #9
They will review the case and examine it from a federal, professional level. Baitball Blogger Jul 2013 #16
They will review it and then marions ghost Jul 2013 #20
Public outrage and pressure. Baitball Blogger Jul 2013 #21
Right--because there's no real ethics at the top marions ghost Jul 2013 #22
Protecting the opinions and rights of the minority Baitball Blogger Jul 2013 #25
You and I are definitely on the same page! marions ghost Jul 2013 #28
Thank you marions ghost. Baitball Blogger Jul 2013 #29
No problem marions ghost Jul 2013 #31
She is going to try to HappyMe Jul 2013 #5
I still find it hard to believe Control-Z Jul 2013 #23
The whole thing stinks to high heaven. HappyMe Jul 2013 #24
djathink? n/t librechik Jul 2013 #7
I think any profits should go to Martin's family.... Blue_Tires Jul 2013 #8
Any lawyers here? Might there be a prosecution case here for jury misconduct?. . . DinahMoeHum Jul 2013 #10
she didnt change her mind the publisher pulled the deal leftyohiolib Jul 2013 #12
I hope that they investigate warrior1 Jul 2013 #13
She had family visits on weekends. alsame Jul 2013 #30
Is this equally outrageous? Nye Bevan Jul 2013 #14
I don't tend to read any of that crap. HappyMe Jul 2013 #19
I agree. But it is also in our hands to not buy the book. I know that is what I'll do. southernyankeebelle Jul 2013 #27
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I don't think Juror B37 a...»Reply #10