Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: What were Glenn Greenwald and Jane Hamsher doing with their curious PAC? [View all]TransitJohn
(6,933 posts)8. Anti-healthcare activist is a gross smear of Hamsher.
True, she didn't support the PPACA, because there was no public option as was promised. Once again, the PPACA?health care. Insurance?health care.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
70 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
What were Glenn Greenwald and Jane Hamsher doing with their curious PAC? [View all]
struggle4progress
Jul 2013
OP
I don't give the teeniest tiniest shit. All I care about is that Greenwald is helping expose the
MotherPetrie
Jul 2013
#1
If you're interested in facts, then carefully double-check whatever GG claims: he has an agenda
struggle4progress
Jul 2013
#2
His agenda is to encourage progressives to vote third-party or just not vote
struggle4progress
Jul 2013
#30
That's not what I hear him talking about, or reporting on, or writing about these days.
99th_Monkey
Jul 2013
#31
Shh. You're only supposed to double-check the claims of approved suspects. n/t
winter is coming
Jul 2013
#44
and as i've stated, the progressives need no encouragement from any outsiders..
frylock
Jul 2013
#56
Greenwald and the NC Republicans certainly agree too many progressives are voting Dem -- though
struggle4progress
Jul 2013
#68
and the ignore button should be used when posters insult others with opposing views and
liberal_at_heart
Jul 2013
#22
If it's all on the up-and-up, then why the absolute desperation to smear GG?
MotherPetrie
Jul 2013
#15
It's good for real progressives to know exactly who he is and what he's been up to: such facts
struggle4progress
Jul 2013
#19
I'm infinitely more concerned about what the NSA is doing on Obama's watch.
MotherPetrie
Jul 2013
#21
GG is blowing pretty smoke-rings from his butt when he says stuff like "The NSA has trillions
struggle4progress
Jul 2013
#26
Nothing supportive of liberal economic policies, that's for damn sure. nt
AllINeedIsCoffee
Jul 2013
#4
Why a monetary transfer between a "progressive" PAC and Paul Ryan's election campaign?
struggle4progress
Jul 2013
#35
The link I gave includes video of a tea-party anti-healthcare activist saying
struggle4progress
Jul 2013
#13
It was certainly clever of GG to turn around and attack SEIU after taking SEIU-COPE money. I notice
struggle4progress
Jul 2013
#49
"... Having SEIU officials — fresh off endorsing the Obama re-election campaign — shape, fund,
struggle4progress
Jul 2013
#62
The Daily Kos post, that you lifted that from, indicates the PAC would mount primary challenges
struggle4progress
Jul 2013
#50