General Discussion

struggle4progress

(120,533 posts)

30. His agenda is to encourage progressives to vote third-party or just not vote

Reply to 99th_Monkey (Reply #28)

Mon Jul 29, 2013, 12:09 AM

Jul 2013

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

70 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

What were Glenn Greenwald and Jane Hamsher doing with their curious PAC? [View all] struggle4progress Jul 2013 OP

I don't give the teeniest tiniest shit. All I care about is that Greenwald is helping expose the MotherPetrie Jul 2013 #1

If you're interested in facts, then carefully double-check whatever GG claims: he has an agenda struggle4progress Jul 2013 #2

You mean a "sinister Libertarian" agenda, don't you? 99th_Monkey Jul 2013 #28

His agenda is to encourage progressives to vote third-party or just not vote struggle4progress Jul 2013 #30

That's not what I hear him talking about, or reporting on, or writing about these days. 99th_Monkey Jul 2013 #31

we get enough encouragement to do that from democrats frylock Jul 2013 #42

This message was self-deleted by its author whatchamacallit Jul 2013 #53

Dopey slogans like that helped hand my state to the Rs! Thanks! struggle4progress Jul 2013 #54

we've been waiting for weeks for y'all to expose the agenda.. frylock Jul 2013 #41

Shh. You're only supposed to double-check the claims of approved suspects. n/t winter is coming Jul 2013 #44

I've posted this link dozens of times. Surely you've seen it by now: struggle4progress Jul 2013 #47

and as i've stated, the progressives need no encouragement from any outsiders.. frylock Jul 2013 #56

Greenwald and the NC Republicans certainly agree too many progressives are voting Dem -- though struggle4progress Jul 2013 #68

well, you can continue to blame greenwald for the democrat's failings.. frylock Jul 2013 #69

+1000 truebluegreen Jul 2013 #3

Greenie is helping himself to some fast cash Whisp Jul 2013 #5

I am INFINITELY more concerned about what the NSA is doing! MotherPetrie Jul 2013 #7

you are being led by the nose. Whisp Jul 2013 #9

The frantically stepped up anti-GG posts today are just so very telling. MotherPetrie Jul 2013 #11

I find it so very pathetic that otherwise intelligent people Whisp Jul 2013 #14

and the ignore button should be used when posters insult others with opposing views and liberal_at_heart Jul 2013 #22

No, the only tizzy I see is by the Snowden supporters. nt SunSeeker Jul 2013 #16

Suuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuure. MotherPetrie Jul 2013 #17

Exactly! nt SunSeeker Jul 2013 #12

I consider trans vaginal probes an egregious violation of our privacy. SunSeeker Jul 2013 #10

If it's all on the up-and-up, then why the absolute desperation to smear GG? MotherPetrie Jul 2013 #15

It's good for real progressives to know exactly who he is and what he's been up to: such facts struggle4progress Jul 2013 #19

I'm infinitely more concerned about what the NSA is doing on Obama's watch. MotherPetrie Jul 2013 #21

GG is blowing pretty smoke-rings from his butt when he says stuff like "The NSA has trillions struggle4progress Jul 2013 #26

Then GG did his job well with you Recursion Jul 2013 #29

There is no "absolute desperation to smear GG." SunSeeker Jul 2013 #20

Nothing supportive of liberal economic policies, that's for damn sure. nt AllINeedIsCoffee Jul 2013 #4

Another minute, another smear. last1standing Jul 2013 #6

Why a monetary transfer between a "progressive" PAC and Paul Ryan's election campaign? struggle4progress Jul 2013 #35

Whoever this PAC donated to doesn't change the facts about NSA spying. last1standing Jul 2013 #57

Anti-healthcare activist is a gross smear of Hamsher. TransitJohn Jul 2013 #8

The link I gave includes video of a tea-party anti-healthcare activist saying struggle4progress Jul 2013 #13

Why are you continuing to conflate the PPACA with healthcare? TransitJohn Jul 2013 #18

it is insurance that allows people to get healthcare. SunSeeker Jul 2013 #23

Sorry. TransitJohn Jul 2013 #24

Right. And a marriage certificate is just a piece of paper. SunSeeker Jul 2013 #25

Blue xylephone woodpecker TransitJohn Jul 2013 #27

Rand, is that you? nt SunSeeker Jul 2013 #34

The same reason we call SS a retirement program Recursion Jul 2013 #33

Good God. We're defending Hamsher now Recursion Jul 2013 #51

No, just lamenting the lack of accuracy around here. TransitJohn Jul 2013 #67

The usual...fleecing the gullible. n/t Scurrilous Jul 2013 #32

Hey! A guy's gotta earn a living somehow, you know. MineralMan Jul 2013 #36

here's 50$ olddots Jul 2013 #38

You bet! Allow 6 months for delivery.** MineralMan Jul 2013 #39

Just received an email response: OilemFirchen Jul 2013 #59

Kick! BumRushDaShow Jul 2013 #37

One other tidbit about Jane Hamsher . . . Major Hogwash Jul 2013 #40

I like how you started the OP out with a lie cthulu2016 Jul 2013 #43

This message was self-deleted by its author seaglass Jul 2013 #45

It was certainly clever of GG to turn around and attack SEIU after taking SEIU-COPE money. I notice struggle4progress Jul 2013 #49

This message was self-deleted by its author seaglass Jul 2013 #58

"... Having SEIU officials — fresh off endorsing the Obama re-election campaign — shape, fund, struggle4progress Jul 2013 #62

The Daily Kos post, that you lifted that from, indicates the PAC would mount primary challenges struggle4progress Jul 2013 #50

I didn't read your post or the one preceding it. OilemFirchen Jul 2013 #60

This message was self-deleted by its author seaglass Jul 2013 #61

Which "lie" was that? I provided links struggle4progress Jul 2013 #48

Thin ice. Major Hogwash Jul 2013 #64

DU rec...nt SidDithers Jul 2013 #46

The People's View is rancid garbage whatchamacallit Jul 2013 #52

The OP provides a link to OpenSecrets that also contains the info struggle4progress Jul 2013 #55

Boink. Scurrilous Jul 2013 #63

Yessirrree nt flamingdem Jul 2013 #65

! JNelson6563 Jul 2013 #66

K & R Scurrilous Jul 2013 #70