Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)If President Obama wants to send a message against the use of chemical weapons; why doesn't he [View all]
Rally Congress to pass a law OUTLAWING the manufacturing them?
Wouldn't that be a better use of his time than agitating to continue the neocon's wars of aggression?
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
43 replies, 4800 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (13)
ReplyReply to this post
43 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
If President Obama wants to send a message against the use of chemical weapons; why doesn't he [View all]
Vincardog
Sep 2013
OP
That article presupposes the necessity for the US to do SOMETHING about this alleged use of CW.
Vincardog
Sep 2013
#6
That misses the point which is "Why are we still manufacturing Chemical Weapons?".
Vincardog
Sep 2013
#11
Now you think Obama was Lying when he told us all he intended to send said "message"?
Dragonfli
Sep 2013
#21
LOL, you are becoming most entertaining, keep it up little hawk, you have a place here
Dragonfli
Sep 2013
#25
Humanitarian hawking is the best kind, those we kill can sign treaties for instance...
Dragonfli
Sep 2013
#27
so as an accused hawk...would I have to have supported every war or not?
VanillaRhapsody
Sep 2013
#29
and if wanting the world to eliminate chemical weapons makes me a hawk...so be it...
VanillaRhapsody
Sep 2013
#30
No, you are doing just fine, hawks need only support the war of the moment and the idea
Dragonfli
Sep 2013
#32
Judging by the sheer number of your posts advocating killing (bombs kill they don't spread love)
Dragonfli
Sep 2013
#39
Not advocating killing....Advocating removing the Chemical Weapons from the world...
VanillaRhapsody
Sep 2013
#40
How would Congress be able to pass a law outlaw the manufactoring of chemical weapons in
lumpy
Sep 2013
#19
It didn't help that the British were supplying the chemicals to Syria after the conflict started!
Rosa Luxemburg
Sep 2013
#36