Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
Mon Sep 16, 2013, 02:18 PM Sep 2013

U.N. Report: Chemical Weapons Use In Syria Confirmed, Details Point To Assad [View all]

U.N. Report: Chemical Weapons Use In Syria Confirmed, Details Point To Assad

By Hayes Brown

The United Nations released its official report on chemical weapons use last month in Syria, determining that sarin gas was used against the civilian population, but stopping short of directly blaming the Syrian government for the incident.

The U.N. team who collected the samples in the days after the Aug. 21 chemical weapons attack that killed — according to U.S. estimates — approximately 1,400 civilians had been present in Syria originally to collect evidence of previous claims of chemical weapons usage. After an acrimonious debate with the Syrian government, the inspectors were finally allowed access to the sites to collect soil samples, biological samples, and interview witnesses.

According to the final report, U.N. weapons inspector Ake Sellstrom and his team determined that “chemical weapons have been used in the ongoing conflict between the parties in the Syrian Arab Republic” against civilians “on a relatively large scale.” The report leaves out estimates of those killed, but clearly documented the effect that the attack had on the sleeping Syrian populace. The early morning hours of the attack and the weather itself conspired to make the attack especially deadly, as the dropping temperature allowed for the heavy gases to “stay close to the ground and penetrate into lower levels of buildings and constructions where many people were seeking shelter.”

Most damning towards the Assad regime are the details of how the weapons were utilized. “Impacted and exploded surface-to-surface rockets, capable to carry a chemical payload, were found to carry Sarin,” according to the report. One such rocket showed evidence that “the rocket warhead appeared to function prior to impacting on the roof (of the building where it was found), releasing its contents and depositing the discovered fragments before travelling through the structure to its terminal location.” The Syrian rebels are not currently believed to possess rockets capable of mounting chemical agents onto before firing, adding to the circumstantial evidence that Syrian president Bashar al-Assad’s government is to blame.

- more -

http://thinkprogress.org/security/2013/09/16/2626601/syria-chemical-weapons-report/

United Nations Mission to Investigate Allegations of the Use of Chemical Weapons in the Syrian Arab Republic
http://www.un.org/disarmament/content/slideshow/Secretary_General_Report_of_CW_Investigation.pdf

French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius said Monday a UN report

French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius said Monday a UN report that proves poison gas killed hundreds in an attack last month in Syria left "no doubt" President Bashar al-Assad's regime was guilty.

"The content of the report is damning and confirms massive use of sarin gas on August 21," Fabius said on RTL radio.

"When you look precisely at the data, the amount of toxic gas used, the complexity of the blends... It all leaves no doubt on the origin of the attack" and "reinforces the position of those who said the regime was guilty."

The report, announced in New York earlier Monday, said evidence collected by inspectors who went to Syria showed sarin was used in an attack on Ghouta near Damascus on August 21.

- more -

http://uk.news.yahoo.com/un-report-leaves-no-doubt-damascus-behind-gas-161019711.html#co0zbBs

Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon statement on UN report of chemical weapons use in Syria
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023677703

97 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
any news on the other child killer? nt msongs Sep 2013 #1
Who? n/t ProSense Sep 2013 #5
Who are you writing about? nt msanthrope Sep 2013 #24
We all know, but don't expect a candid answer. nt geek tragedy Sep 2013 #37
You know, I tend to stand by things I write. nt msanthrope Sep 2013 #38
Indeed, They Do, Ma'am The Magistrate Sep 2013 #2
+1 Daniel537 Sep 2013 #3
So, let loose the bombs? Warren Stupidity Sep 2013 #4
You Will Have A Hard Time, Sir, Finding Any Post By Me Calling For U.S. Bombing Of Syria The Magistrate Sep 2013 #6
I am having a hard time finding anything in your reply that opposes unilateral war on Syria. Warren Stupidity Sep 2013 #9
Did the UN report make you sad? ProSense Sep 2013 #10
No. See how easy it is to answer a question directly? Warren Stupidity Sep 2013 #19
Evidently, it's as "easy" as posing strawman questions. n/t ProSense Sep 2013 #22
It is a "strawman argument" - not a "strawman question". Warren Stupidity Sep 2013 #41
Well, thanks for clarifying that. ProSense Sep 2013 #44
So Any Post That Observes Established Facts Supports Unilateral War, Sir? The Magistrate Sep 2013 #12
No, it was a question. A question you still have not clearly answered. Warren Stupidity Sep 2013 #20
I Judge These Matters on A Case By Case Basis, Sir The Magistrate Sep 2013 #25
I simply asked if, given the UN report, you support unilateral military action against Syria. Warren Stupidity Sep 2013 #29
Push That Far Enough, Sir, And You Are Just A Figment Of My Imagination.... The Magistrate Sep 2013 #30
again no answer. Warren Stupidity Sep 2013 #32
Just Because You Do Not Like It, Sir, Does Not Change That It Is an Answer The Magistrate Sep 2013 #35
Now that would be a strawman argument. Warren Stupidity Sep 2013 #42
So the closest you come to actually opposing unilateralism is this post: Warren Stupidity Sep 2013 #43
I Know What I Have Written, Sir The Magistrate Sep 2013 #45
Well I have to agree with what you said up thread: Warren Stupidity Sep 2013 #92
your reaction, sir, to Statement Of Fact, Made The Matter Obvious The Magistrate Sep 2013 #93
How is embracing reality a pro- war statement? nt geek tragedy Sep 2013 #14
Do you support unilateral military action against Syria? Warren Stupidity Sep 2013 #21
No, and I never have. geek tragedy Sep 2013 #23
So when President Obama was proposing unilateral military action against Syria Warren Stupidity Sep 2013 #28
Yes. If this surprises you, it's because you geek tragedy Sep 2013 #33
No that's fine. I'm glad you are against neocon unilateralism. We all should be. Warren Stupidity Sep 2013 #39
keep trying... Whisp Sep 2013 #36
What disappointment? I'm glad we are not in another war. Warren Stupidity Sep 2013 #40
It's sad... NCTraveler Sep 2013 #11
I think you slept through last week karynnj Sep 2013 #13
"This ought to put an end to 'rebels did it ---false flag' chatter" zappaman Sep 2013 #7
While It Ought To, Sir, I Share Your Doubts It Actually Will The Magistrate Sep 2013 #8
Let's put it this way: The idea it was a dime-store false flag attack.... Junkdrawer Sep 2013 #46
Syrian Government Weapons, Sir, Fired From Syrian Government Territory The Magistrate Sep 2013 #48
With a $20 billion+ / year Black Ops budget, I'd be SHOCKED if this were unraveled quickly. Junkdrawer Sep 2013 #50
That Is A Declaration Of Faith, Sir, Not a Conclusion From Evidence The Magistrate Sep 2013 #51
This isn't my first dance. Anyone who thought they KNEW what happened 9/11/2001 on 9/30/2001.... Junkdrawer Sep 2013 #53
It Is Always The Same Dance, Sir: Same Old Story, Same Old Song And Dance.... The Magistrate Sep 2013 #56
Here, Ma'am, Is A Good Copy Of The Whole Report The Magistrate Sep 2013 #15
In lieu of photographic evidence, they have an artist's rending of Assad carrying Sarin rustydog Sep 2013 #16
Correction: Details Point to Government KamaAina Sep 2013 #17
What you suggest bolsters the case for strikes. If Assad is no longer in control of msanthrope Sep 2013 #26
It is what it is.... Junkdrawer Sep 2013 #31
Of course not. KamaAina Sep 2013 #49
You're ProSense Sep 2013 #52
The point isn't to 'punish' Assad, but to ensure that chemical weapons aren't used by the msanthrope Sep 2013 #54
Right here at DU. Where else? KamaAina Sep 2013 #60
Can you cite that? nt msanthrope Sep 2013 #62
Yes. KamaAina Sep 2013 #91
An unconfirmed report from a German newspaper citing unnamed sources? msanthrope Sep 2013 #94
But this part of the report is ignored: ProSense Sep 2013 #95
The absolving of Bashir Assad is a disgusting turn in this whole mess....I don't know msanthrope Sep 2013 #96
Thanks ProSense. Scurrilous Sep 2013 #18
Brown Moses, Benton D Struckcheon Sep 2013 #27
DU rec...nt SidDithers Sep 2013 #34
I hope the Assad Protectors really get a good Cha Sep 2013 #47
U.N. Team Confirms Syria Chemical Attack but Not Culpability Jefferson23 Sep 2013 #55
The report ProSense Sep 2013 #59
How does this change what should take place next, which was layed out in the OP I posted? n/t Jefferson23 Sep 2013 #61
The US, Russia and international community are working on what will "take place next." ProSense Sep 2013 #63
No, culpability was not part of the mandate, remember? What should take place next is just that: Jefferson23 Sep 2013 #66
The UN presents evidence. ProSense Sep 2013 #69
Pretending what? You have no clue what you're doing here. I have presented to you Jefferson23 Sep 2013 #70
You're arguing a point ProSense Sep 2013 #72
I posted an OP making the process clear, period...you're arguing with yourself. Jefferson23 Sep 2013 #74
What "process"? ProSense Sep 2013 #75
Then you should read the OP I posted. It does not matter who has Jefferson23 Sep 2013 #78
"they have to vote and do so formally, period." ProSense Sep 2013 #79
I dismissed nothing, you presumed I was dismissing the UN report. The protocol is important Jefferson23 Sep 2013 #80
Are the UK, US and France members of the UN Security Council? ProSense Sep 2013 #81
I will repeat, one last time. The point of the OP is a reminder Jefferson23 Sep 2013 #82
No, it's your point that's "irrelevant." ProSense Sep 2013 #84
Inconvenient how the UNSC and international law can get in the way. Jefferson23 Sep 2013 #85
"UNSC and international law" isn't getting "in the way." ProSense Sep 2013 #86
And the UNSC has not voted on his reponsibility, yet. Let them all do their job, that is the point Jefferson23 Sep 2013 #87
Nice! Now we can justify bombing the shit out of their civilians with conventional weapons NoOneMan Sep 2013 #57
Assad 2016!!!! n/t ProSense Sep 2013 #58
We'll have to squeeze our missiles in between those Assad fires at civilians. pampango Sep 2013 #64
... davidpdx Sep 2013 #90
I don't believe the report. Eddie Haskell Sep 2013 #65
Understandable ProSense Sep 2013 #67
Pertinent Tweet.. Cha Sep 2013 #68
Wait for the UN ProSense Sep 2013 #71
What they're really doing.. is exposing.. Cha Sep 2013 #73
Wait for the UN, wait for the UN .... I don't believe the UN. Here comes the bus. pampango Sep 2013 #76
Thanks Prosense, a great post ! Sand Wind Sep 2013 #77
Some say it was the rebels Rosa Luxemburg Sep 2013 #83
Some say Barack Obama was born in Kenya. Barack_America Sep 2013 #88
Some say US never go to the moon. Sand Wind Sep 2013 #89
Kick. Sand Wind Sep 2013 #97
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»U.N. Report: Chemical Wea...