Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Does the Washington Redskins' name and logo honor Native Americans or not? [View all]LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)61. Polls please
I would like to see a poll on that.
The only poll I found on it of Native Americans showed 90% were not offended, and 9% were.
Ninety percent of Indians took that position, while 9 percent said they found the name offensive. One percent had no answer. The margin of sampling error for those findings was plus or minus two percentage points.
http://www.annenbergpublicpolicycenter.org/downloads/political_communication/naes/2004_03_redskins_09-24_pr.pdf
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
92 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
![](du4img/smicon-reply-new.gif)
Does the Washington Redskins' name and logo honor Native Americans or not? [View all]
CreekDog
Oct 2013
OP
but then how does it honor Native Americans if it's just to make the team money?
CreekDog
Oct 2013
#16
most of that history they wouldn't hire black players --is that the history they should hold onto?
CreekDog
Oct 2013
#29
so you're saying one guy who likes the names trumps all those who thinks it's offensive?
CreekDog
Oct 2013
#45
Most Native Americans seem to be fine with the name at least according to polling.
PragmaticLiberal
Oct 2013
#60
Absolutely, there are Native American groups advocating a name change.
PragmaticLiberal
Oct 2013
#72
No, but I think that the lack of money makes it obvious any "honor" intended is hollow
CreekDog
Oct 2013
#32
Maybe when the team name was created in 1933 as the Boston Redskins, the term was not seen as
Fla Dem
Oct 2013
#26
How many Amerindians does it require to validate or invalidate something as an insult?
LanternWaste
Oct 2013
#21
I think it's that whole fighting spirit thing. Indians had a rep as scary fighters.
Comrade Grumpy
Oct 2013
#8
So there are no meat packing houses outside the region of Green Bay? n/t
A HERETIC I AM
Oct 2013
#36
I've never seen a sports team called The Fightin' Conscientious Objectors
Comrade Grumpy
Oct 2013
#42
There are examples where it's debatable but the Redskins and the Cleveland Indians?
el_bryanto
Oct 2013
#11
The correct answer IMHO-if Native Americans are insulted (and I would be)-then change it.
Boomerproud
Oct 2013
#51
"Braves" and names after specific tribes (i.e. "Seminoles") are one thing.
Tommy_Carcetti
Oct 2013
#28
because they were so honorable that they were banning blacks from their team at the same time?
CreekDog
Oct 2013
#46
and what were the other ways that the University of North Dakota honored the Sioux?
CreekDog
Oct 2013
#58
We know why it was chosen: when they moved to Fenway they wanted to tie in with the Red Sox
Recursion
Oct 2013
#73