Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This message was self-deleted by its author [View all]calimary
(81,514 posts)5. Welcome to DU, hooverville29~
Glad you're here! Your question is good. McAuliffe is damaged goods. But YEEEKS he's BEYOND better than the alternative! The alternative, in Virginia, is "Hello 6th Century!" HORRIFYING to me to see that it's still this close. It should be a slam-dunk.
TopBack to the top of the page
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
ShareGet links to this post
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
45 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
But as to his point, why aren't we winning huge, esp. with Sarvis siphoning off GOP votes
hooverville29
Nov 2013
#3
PW said conservatives vs hard core progressives end in conservative victories in New England.
NuclearDem
Nov 2013
#28
D'oh, that's right. I don't know why I pictured New England as being larger.
NuclearDem
Nov 2013
#32
I'm on pins and needles with the 1% difference right now. It's going the way of the Rove playbook.
ancianita
Nov 2013
#10
I hope people remember that during the 2016 election when they complain that
Auntie Bush
Nov 2013
#39
When Dems nominate people who aren't too left wing in border states--they win. Look at Missouri
Pretzel_Warrior
Nov 2013
#38