Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Are people who believe Abortion should be legal but rare objectively anti-Choice? [View all]Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)52. Legal but rare means that education and contraceptives are easily avaiable to all women
so that unplanned pregnancies happen because of a failure of contraceptive, other rare accident, or brutal rape.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
98 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Are people who believe Abortion should be legal but rare objectively anti-Choice? [View all]
el_bryanto
Nov 2013
OP
Depends on the meaning of rare. If rare means that you improve general conditions (access to birth
Mass
Nov 2013
#3
I think the word "rare" is problematic as it ignores how desperately more clinics are needed...
bettyellen
Nov 2013
#11
It's not about 'ceding' the damn word. It's about not using a measure of frequency in policy or
PeaceNikki
Nov 2013
#77
There have been recent posts that suggest that focusing on those issues is a form of "slut shaming"
el_bryanto
Nov 2013
#6
I'm not really eligible I suppose - so I should preferably keep my opinions to myself on this issue.
el_bryanto
Nov 2013
#24
How can they not be objectively anti choice and yet provide most of the cover
el_bryanto
Nov 2013
#22
That's a fair point - I did use the Orwell Language (filtered through my memories of the Bush Years)
el_bryanto
Nov 2013
#34
Clearly they feel the right to keep count and set limits. Other people's bodies are for them to
Bluenorthwest
Nov 2013
#28
So this goes beyond mere ignorance in your opinion - people who use this language
el_bryanto
Nov 2013
#31
They get conflated because some people who choose to have an abortion are punished
el_bryanto
Nov 2013
#37
The argument is, as I understand it, that if you are in favor of keeping abortion legal
el_bryanto
Nov 2013
#44
i see. i think there are good reasons for having abortions, and bad ones. each case is unique. but
dionysus
Nov 2013
#45
What are bad reasons to have an abortion? I guess that would be my one question nt
el_bryanto
Nov 2013
#47
this story is an outlier, i would assume, but there was the case of this girl in college that
dionysus
Nov 2013
#48
oh, anti choicers would have a field day with that. but i don't think the sort of thing i witnessed
dionysus
Nov 2013
#50
Legal but rare means that education and contraceptives are easily avaiable to all women
Agnosticsherbet
Nov 2013
#52
But does the former create cover for those who think that Abortion should be illegal?
el_bryanto
Nov 2013
#55
You're conflating people who say "rare" because they want to restrict abortion with people
winter is coming
Nov 2013
#54
The problem is that words mean things. And using language like "rare" is dangerous.
PeaceNikki
Nov 2013
#57
Whoosh. Of course the word "rare" is subjective. That's why it can't and shouldn't
winter is coming
Nov 2013
#66
whoosh? whatever, you are ceding a fucking word. the "rare" verbiage was pulled from platform for a
PeaceNikki
Nov 2013
#67
What's asinine is attempting to label pro-choice people anti-choice because they haven't
winter is coming
Nov 2013
#68
similar to those who believe in "secular gay marriage" but also believe being gay is immoral
La Lioness Priyanka
Nov 2013
#70
yes, i have met a few people. usually extremely religious but with a strong belief that govt should
La Lioness Priyanka
Nov 2013
#78
well thanks for confirming that i wasn't the only person who knew these people
La Lioness Priyanka
Nov 2013
#95
It stigmatizes women's health care choices. It implies that it's a decision that should NOT be made.
PeaceNikki
Nov 2013
#72
I don't think it stigmatizes anything, although some may choose to defensively take it that way.
dawg
Nov 2013
#79
The more I read, the more I realize this is a really interesting and nuanced issue.
dawg
Nov 2013
#83
thanks. yes, I think the phrase was effective at the time. but we're evolving
PeaceNikki
Nov 2013
#84