Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: My take on JFK Conspiracy Theories and Theorists. [View all]JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)89. Other than that he was an intel asset
and a fake as a Marxist, no prob.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
154 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Someone once told me to trust in one who seeks the truth, and avoid any who claim to have found it.
Scuba
Nov 2013
#10
Sigh... His passport was never taken away because he never returned to the Embassy to officially
stopbush
Nov 2013
#109
You mean after he ducked in without buying a ticket? Despite having $13 in bills and some change?
Spider Jerusalem
Nov 2013
#80
You know that repeating and repeating a blanket statement doesn't make it true, right?
GoneFishin
Nov 2013
#92
All film including unexposed rolls were confiscated by the FBI from everyone at the autopsy. n/t
GoneFishin
Nov 2013
#143
This is in the records of the HSCA investigation. It's quite easily confirmed.
Spider Jerusalem
Nov 2013
#147
Yeah, because a group organized enough to kill the leader of the most powerful country in the
GoneFishin
Nov 2013
#96
Agreed. But people who are constitutionally incapable of acknowledging that rich white guys with
GoneFishin
Nov 2013
#142
I'd take you seriously if you could supply any evidence that supports your contentions.
Spider Jerusalem
Nov 2013
#121
There seems to be some truth to the claim that the CIA and FBI weren't fully forthcoming.
DanTex
Nov 2013
#19
Who said Oswald was not the shooter? I believe he was. That is not the question, that is merely a
sabrina 1
Nov 2013
#48
What they mostly got wrong was claiming Oswald acted alone according to the opinion of a majority
sabrina 1
Nov 2013
#78
Except that conclusion was based on acoustical evidence that everyone knows was false.
zappaman
Nov 2013
#5
If Nixon was talking about being involved in any way in the assassination of Kennedy ...
zbdent
Nov 2013
#27
Watergate also shows how journalism got into the ring better equipped than it was during the Kennedy
ancianita
Nov 2013
#111
Studies have shown that people seek out news and information they already agree with
KurtNYC
Nov 2013
#35
A majority of Americans believe in a guardian angel that watches over them and keeps them safe.
zappaman
Nov 2013
#14
Most Americans are completely ignorant of the evidence in the Kennedy assassinaton.
Spider Jerusalem
Nov 2013
#63
Historians will tell you that history's evidence gets killed and buried all the time, or else we
ancianita
Nov 2013
#17
You're right about me, Stone and others being deniers. So be it. The truth will out.
ancianita
Nov 2013
#29
No harm no foul. However...All overturned evidence in any human arena is relevant.
ancianita
Nov 2013
#33
Fair Enough. And like I said in the OP, I've been reading about this for only a few weeks.
DanTex
Nov 2013
#49
No,we can't reject existing evidence. But it's not the whole truth.Thus, disputes that get dismissed
ancianita
Nov 2013
#68
True. There is no evidence that he received support in any of the "stops" he had....
RagAss
Nov 2013
#65
I agree with you. The Warren Commission's mission was to come up with "official theory."
ancianita
Nov 2013
#39
There were no competing investigators to fight the evidence scrubbers of that analog time. There
ancianita
Nov 2013
#38
You're right. Vetting takes time, what with all the disinformation bot system at work digitally.
ancianita
Nov 2013
#72
It's not that just he was a lawyer for People's Temple, it's that he alleged that
DanTex
Nov 2013
#59
Believing in a government conspiracy against the paradise of People's Temple makes a person a nut.
DanTex
Nov 2013
#64
That's not true at all, and misrepresenting my argument doesn't help your case.
DanTex
Nov 2013
#131
I agree completely with your first sentence. However, there is plenty of room on the jerkwad train
ScreamingMeemie
Nov 2013
#76
I hate the term 'conspiracy theory'. A 'conspiracy guess' does not a theory make.
Captain Stern
Nov 2013
#73
If you were objective about it, then how did you resolve all the inconsistencies?
GoneFishin
Nov 2013
#99
You accept the Warren Report. Oh well. A lot of your information is wrong though. n/t
GoneFishin
Nov 2013
#141
And who impersonated him on the phone to the Cuban & Soviet embassies? Why did the CIA cover it up?
Warren DeMontague
Nov 2013
#137
From what I've read, the impersonation theory has been pretty soundly disproved.
DanTex
Nov 2013
#138
Any public deprived of citizens' right to information of public concern is not in any way CT. This
ancianita
Nov 2013
#112
The HSCA basically agreed with the WC about everything except the audio evidence.
DanTex
Nov 2013
#124