General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: CNN Tonight: The Assassination of JFK [View all]stopbush
(24,396 posts)Why is it disinformation to provide you with a once-confidential document written by Arlen Spector - who worked as an assistant counsel for the WC and who was, BTW, a Democrat at the time - that proves exactly what I said in a previous post about why the WC wanted to "move" the position of the bullet wound to JFK's back on the autopsy DRAWINGS to align with the autopsy PICTURES, which were obviously more accurate?
Surely even a CTist like yourself can admit that the actual photographs are prima faciae going to be more accurate than drawings. What could possibly be wrong with Specter and the WC wanting to be as accurate as possible in defining where the bullet entered JFK's back?
Sorry, but I happen to know what I'm talking about. It's you whose mind is closed to the actual documentation and evidence in this case.