Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

The Midway Rebel

(2,191 posts)
84. You are not disagreeing with people.
Mon Nov 25, 2013, 02:49 AM
Nov 2013

You are disagreeing with science and facts that overwhelmingly point at LHO as the lone shooter.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

So vocal? The Midway Rebel Nov 2013 #1
Its getting to be a lot like Fox's war on Christmas. JoePhilly Nov 2013 #92
You mean like posting 10 different threads about the same thing? Spider Jerusalem Nov 2013 #2
I thought Obama was born on the moon but Jackpine Radical Nov 2013 #127
Well, when you repeatedly "call out" people for not sharing your belief... Scootaloo Nov 2013 #3
I Don't Believe I've Ever Told ANYBODY To Stop Posting Their Beliefs, Concerns, Positions, Etc... WillyT Nov 2013 #4
Well, the answer is obvious Scootaloo Nov 2013 #5
Whoa... You Have A Good Night OK ??? WillyT Nov 2013 #6
LOL Scootaloo Nov 2013 #8
Really? If that is how you approach issues, just make stuff up, then it's no wonder sabrina 1 Nov 2013 #13
but others have... Th1onein Nov 2013 #131
The most obvious but unfocused on question is who . . . brush Nov 2013 #7
Of all the errors in this post, I'll pick just one. DanTex Nov 2013 #10
rofl. NT BootinUp Nov 2013 #12
Why kill Oswald then if he was the lone nut? brush Nov 2013 #16
Jack Ruby killed him because he was angry that Oswald shot Kennedy. DanTex Nov 2013 #17
Google Ruby brush Nov 2013 #24
So thats what you consider a reputable source? BootinUp Nov 2013 #25
To believe, imo, that Oswald killed Kennedy . . . brush Nov 2013 #27
I don't claim to know what was in either man's mind. BootinUp Nov 2013 #31
Believe the single shooter thing if you want brush Nov 2013 #34
My dear brush BootinUp Nov 2013 #37
Where is the evidence of that? BlueStreak Nov 2013 #52
CE399 The so called magic bullet BootinUp Nov 2013 #56
Nonsense. BlueStreak Nov 2013 #65
Oh boy. I feel like Sam Beckett, when he just leaped into another person. BootinUp Nov 2013 #68
I went and looked for the latest info on ballistics etc BootinUp Nov 2013 #83
Briefly. DanTex Nov 2013 #57
Thanks for presenting the facts - saved me the time. stopbush Nov 2013 #58
I continue to be shocked at just how few facts the CTers are actually aware of. DanTex Nov 2013 #61
Actually, they are willfully and blissfully unaware of the facts in the JFK case. stopbush Nov 2013 #63
Its a conspiracy of ignorance. The Midway Rebel Nov 2013 #64
Since you ignored my last question, let's try round 2. DanTex Nov 2013 #32
And why not kill Oswald before the police catch him. JoePhilly Nov 2013 #128
Yes, if you google hard enough you can eventually find a website that says whatever you want. DanTex Nov 2013 #26
What factual matter do you have that Oswald killed Kennedy alone but the Warren Commission? brush Nov 2013 #30
All of the testimony and the evidence on record, and with the findings DanTex Nov 2013 #33
Sure, sure. Keep believing it if you want. brush Nov 2013 #35
Yes, that's what I do in the face of conclusive evidence. DanTex Nov 2013 #38
The Warren Commission did not have factual evidence that Oswald acted alone Samantha Nov 2013 #59
The Mac Wallace story is a fraud concocted by conspiracy theorists. DanTex Nov 2013 #67
Bugliosi is full of it. eomer Nov 2013 #91
No, you are full of it. DanTex Nov 2013 #93
Read Bugliosi's confused account as many times as you'd like, it's still wrong. eomer Nov 2013 #95
OK then. It's been a interesting trip down the rabbit hole... DanTex Nov 2013 #96
Bugliosi claims it was a palm print compared with a fingerprint, Darby says it was two fingerprints eomer Nov 2013 #106
Sigh. Bugliosi is saying that the prints that Darby matched were not the unidentified latent prints DanTex Nov 2013 #113
So you're sticking to your story that a fingerprint expert found a 14-point match eomer Nov 2013 #120
LOL. When proven run the conspiracy nut runs and hides. DanTex Nov 2013 #122
When you've made an ass of yourself, claim victory! eomer Nov 2013 #126
I usually agree with Vincent Bugliosi but not this time Samantha Nov 2013 #121
His intention was to demonstrate that the conspiracy theorists did not actually DanTex Nov 2013 #124
First of all, Barr McClellan was one of Johnson's attorneys, not some remote conspiracy theorist Samantha Nov 2013 #148
He was most definitely a conspiracy theorist. DanTex Nov 2013 #153
He was a member of Johnson's legal team and had inside information Samantha Nov 2013 #155
Tell you what. DanTex Nov 2013 #156
I am impressed Samantha Nov 2013 #160
Oh Dear BootinUp Nov 2013 #161
ONE photocopy of a cardboard-box print was claimed to match a photocopy struggle4progress Nov 2013 #140
Wallace was murdered in 1971 as a result of his exhaust being rigged Samantha Nov 2013 #149
It's speculation reported as fact. If you want to complain about the general atmosphere in Texas struggle4progress Nov 2013 #150
Actually, five separate government investigations came to the same conclusion as the WC. stopbush Nov 2013 #66
5 seperate investigations? brush Nov 2013 #69
So I stood up and told that teachin' lady... The Midway Rebel Nov 2013 #71
They were all based on the evidence. stopbush Nov 2013 #72
There sure seem to be a lot of people . . . brush Nov 2013 #73
Maybe some of them have been paid, not me though, lol. BootinUp Nov 2013 #74
That's because before the JFK assassination... The Midway Rebel Nov 2013 #75
Not me. I don't care what you believe. I'm not here to get anyone to buy into anything. stopbush Nov 2013 #76
We'll agree to disagree. Please continue with the buy-in campaign. nt brush Nov 2013 #81
You are not disagreeing with people. The Midway Rebel Nov 2013 #84
Wonder what the Kennedy family thinks about your position? nt brush Nov 2013 #89
Try this link . . . brush Nov 2013 #152
Interesting, yes. The Midway Rebel Nov 2013 #154
Enjoy your ignorance-is-bliss non-review of the evidence. stopbush Nov 2013 #85
Wonder what the Kennedy family thinks about your position? nt brush Nov 2013 #90
Depends which generation of Kennedys you ask. stopbush Nov 2013 #116
His son has recently expressed doubt about the lone shooter theory. nt brush Nov 2013 #135
That would be RFK Jr, the zealous spokesman for the "vaccines cause autism" claque, stopbush Nov 2013 #136
Don't think he's the only in the family . . . brush Nov 2013 #138
You cited him as a source, not me, so why go off on the "family' tangent? stopbush Nov 2013 #139
I cited the family first . . . oh, never mind. Seems we're both talking to our respective choir. brush Nov 2013 #141
Shame On You !!! WillyT Nov 2013 #142
Thanks for the humor. eom stopbush Nov 2013 #143
Yeah... You're One Funny... WillyT Nov 2013 #144
Try this link . . . brush Nov 2013 #151
Desperation is the right word. Rex Nov 2013 #98
Jack Ruby's statements before and after killing Oswald disprove your claim stopbush Nov 2013 #77
Says the poster with the most threads on the subject. lol. BootinUp Nov 2013 #9
I think it's the other way around when it comes to being vocal and sensitive. Kaleva Nov 2013 #11
My problem with the whole thing is they locked up everything for 75 years. That tells me shraby Nov 2013 #14
People keep saying this and it is not true. Please inform yourself and stop spreading misinformation The Midway Rebel Nov 2013 #15
Ah, Young One... You Spread Yourself Obviously Thin... WillyT Nov 2013 #20
Mmm...spread thin...like the glaze on a Krispy Kreme. The Midway Rebel Nov 2013 #21
Another "fact" that is repeated but in fact has no basis. grantcart Nov 2013 #19
I remember when they did it. That's exactly how it was presented and stuff is still shraby Nov 2013 #158
What you remember is somebody saying that, but it was never true. grantcart Nov 2013 #163
Yup, strange that the ol' U.S. guvimment had to lock it up for so damned long. Major Hogwash Nov 2013 #79
You are aware that most people who have looked at the scientific grantcart Nov 2013 #18
Seriously ??? - "Bugliosi's Work" ??? WillyT Nov 2013 #22
Even if you mocked him like that a hundred thousand times BootinUp Nov 2013 #23
Unless you can honestly tell us that you yourself have read Bugliosi's book, stopbush Nov 2013 #80
This message was self-deleted by its author The Midway Rebel Nov 2013 #28
What I find interesting is that they will not acknowledge the possibility that others helped Oswald Jetboy Nov 2013 #29
Yes, it's possible. But zero evidence has been found to suggest that. DanTex Nov 2013 #36
IT'S POSSIBLE Jetboy Nov 2013 #39
OK, now your turn. DanTex Nov 2013 #40
I believe that it is likely that LHO shot Kennedy, Jetboy Nov 2013 #42
It is extremely unlikely that Oswald had help. DanTex Nov 2013 #48
Yes, it is possible. Jetboy Nov 2013 #51
Since we're treating each other with respect... DanTex Nov 2013 #55
Whenever I've thought about the afterlife, the first thing I always think of is learning what really Jetboy Nov 2013 #88
Conspiracy theorists rarely ask good questions. greyl Nov 2013 #43
Responding indicates that you believe there is a chance that LHO Jetboy Nov 2013 #47
There's no evidence LHO had help in the way I think you mean, greyl Nov 2013 #82
I have one point and one point only and that is that it is VERY reasonable to believe that LHO Jetboy Nov 2013 #86
That indicates it was an example of dishonest argumentation from a conspiracy theory fan, right? greyl Nov 2013 #157
'What evidence makes you so certain that LHO had help?' Jetboy Nov 2013 #159
In a very real way, JFK helped Oswald kill JFK. stopbush Nov 2013 #78
They can't. As soon as you entertain that possibility, the whole Warren Theory crashes down. BlueStreak Nov 2013 #94
Specific to point 2 BlueStreak Nov 2013 #100
Here, then. Spider Jerusalem Nov 2013 #102
In other words. NONE of them was successful BlueStreak Nov 2013 #111
Where do you come up with this bogus "1.66 seconds"? Spider Jerusalem Nov 2013 #114
That is the time between the second and third shot BlueStreak Nov 2013 #118
No it wasn't? Spider Jerusalem Nov 2013 #123
There shouldn't be any controversy about the timing. BlueStreak Nov 2013 #133
There is no controversy about the timing. Spider Jerusalem Nov 2013 #134
1.66 seconds! LOL! DanTex Nov 2013 #130
Really? Spider Jerusalem Nov 2013 #101
as to "moving target" jberryhill Nov 2013 #132
LOL! So you are saying we are like most Americans? Rex Nov 2013 #41
Same reason the same people were apoplectic about Snowden. They are authoritarians. BlueStreak Nov 2013 #44
Exactly. polichick Nov 2013 #45
Jeezus people! We are through the looking glass here! The Midway Rebel Nov 2013 #50
As I was saying, authoritarians. Attack anybody who questions authority. BlueStreak Nov 2013 #53
No. The Midway Rebel Nov 2013 #54
You've got that backwards. DanTex Nov 2013 #60
Most of this BS is not "questioning" anything. Silent3 Nov 2013 #97
Not really, no, it's more like this: Spider Jerusalem Nov 2013 #129
Exactly! The very reason the DU forum was started for! Major Hogwash Nov 2013 #137
It makes me wonder why they are here at all BlueStreak Nov 2013 #147
Evidence colsohlibgal Nov 2013 #46
What about this evidence? The Midway Rebel Nov 2013 #49
"I know the right acquires operatives to dispute liberal claims on message boards..." Bolo Boffin Nov 2013 #87
Let's pick one of those - "the three tramps" jberryhill Nov 2013 #104
Charles Harrelson, HockeyMom Nov 2013 #107
The Dallas police records identified all three jberryhill Nov 2013 #109
A majority of Americans believed Saddam had WMD. stopbush Nov 2013 #62
Actually that was polled republicans that believed in WMD. Rex Nov 2013 #99
A Harris Poll taken in Nov 2004 found that 90% of Americans stopbush Nov 2013 #108
Funny cannot find that poll in their vault. Rex Nov 2013 #110
Probably right. Try searching on "Harris Poll Nov 2004 Saddam." You'll probably stopbush Nov 2013 #112
The vault might be limited, it is not in there. Rex Nov 2013 #115
Try this: stopbush Nov 2013 #117
'Would have made WMD' and 'believed he had WMD' are two different things completely. Rex Nov 2013 #119
Correct. stopbush Nov 2013 #125
I do! gopiscrap Nov 2013 #70
A majority of Americans also believe ghosts, God, Jesus, and angels are real. HooptieWagon Nov 2013 #103
+1 jberryhill Nov 2013 #105
Yeah... I Know... How Stupid ARE Those People ??? WillyT Nov 2013 #145
Unicorns, aliens... I know a Republican upi402 Nov 2013 #162
Gatekeepers, Hall Monitors, Know-it-alls... whatchamacallit Nov 2013 #146
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»So... The Majority Here A...»Reply #84