Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(62,444 posts)

8. Correct

Mon Dec 23, 2013, 03:56 PM

Dec 2013

And the direct and current answer to this question is that they can do the same thing because this decision is not binding on any other state.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

12 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

What is the scope of the Utah decision? [View all] jmowreader Dec 2013 OP

It is the law in that judicial district jberryhill Dec 2013 #2

I think it is larger than the previous 2 posts state. Motown_Johnny Dec 2013 #3

"Once this ruling is upheld" jberryhill Dec 2013 #4

I am simply acknowledging that this isn't a done deal. Motown_Johnny Dec 2013 #5

Yes jberryhill Dec 2013 #6

I see no implication of geographical limitations in the OP Motown_Johnny Dec 2013 #7

Correct jberryhill Dec 2013 #8

I said it could be the precedent for future decisions (paraphrased) Motown_Johnny Dec 2013 #9

Is there something you think we disagree about? jberryhill Dec 2013 #10

We are arguing semantics Motown_Johnny Dec 2013 #11

Exactly jmowreader Dec 2013 #12