Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
110 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Unfortunately edhopper Jan 2014 #1
Let's turn Congress Blue BlueToTheBone Jan 2014 #3
You point out a rational path. I find it interesting that NO ONE replied to you before me. bluestate10 Jan 2014 #91
I am never surprised when no responds to this message BlueToTheBone Jan 2014 #95
Yes, it's terrible news that unemployment has gone down. tabasco Jan 2014 #4
You really think edhopper Jan 2014 #5
I do believe it was repukes that killed PBO's jobs bill. BlancheSplanchnik Jan 2014 #10
True edhopper Jan 2014 #12
the REPUKELICAN sequester and REPUKELICAN budget cuts. BlancheSplanchnik Jan 2014 #17
Agree with your last line edhopper Jan 2014 #20
omg I don't even want to picture what things would be like now BlancheSplanchnik Jan 2014 #23
The sequester has very little to do with the deficit reduction. The overwhelming majority of it came okaawhatever Jan 2014 #64
I can tell you that things like my retirement plans SheilaT Jan 2014 #77
IIRC, they did what no other Congress has done; shut down all government spending stimulus, even to freshwest Jan 2014 #84
In reality those numbers also UNDERSTATE the decrease karynnj Jan 2014 #34
I seem to remember 2010... freebrew Jan 2014 #47
Unemployment peaked at 10.2% in Nov 2009. DCBob Jan 2014 #63
It took FDR over 8 years to bring employment back to pre-Depression levels mikekohr Jan 2014 #68
But FDR gave us more government jobs not wage freezes fasttense Jan 2014 #90
Brutal, your right Grumpy McCain or Money Bags Romney in hindsight was the clear choice mikekohr Jan 2014 #97
It's not knee jerk criticism fasttense Jan 2014 #110
Say hello to Repuke congress. maced666 Jan 2014 #71
... 840high Jan 2014 #78
Really. 7% is not accurate. lonestarnot Jan 2014 #6
Unemployment is down because people have given up Demeter Jan 2014 #8
Absolutely correct! Shemp Howard Jan 2014 #21
Some more info from wiki on the Long term unemployed bobduca Jan 2014 #26
Tangentially related to this is the acronym NEET... Locut0s Jan 2014 #73
It is if your new job pays half of what the old one did. progressoid Jan 2014 #42
He has a point. Eddie Haskell Jan 2014 #76
Those unemployment numbers and median income numbers are also AMAZING, considering that TrollBuster9090 Jan 2014 #75
And the re-inflation of a bubble in the stock market is nothing to celebrate. Also those aren't pam4water Jan 2014 #83
thanks!!!! spanone Jan 2014 #2
Wrong things being measured seabeckind Jan 2014 #7
Very well said. truebluegreen Jan 2014 #11
Now you are messing with their figuring. zeemike Jan 2014 #35
Thank you. The 99 percent are being destroyed by corporate policy. woo me with science Jan 2014 #57
Wooed me for sure... intersectionality Jan 2014 #87
Nailed it. ctsnowman Jan 2014 #88
Good post. 840high Jan 2014 #79
80% of the items on the list have a DIRECT bearing on the economy and working people. bluestate10 Jan 2014 #93
YAY! wall street! FatBuddy Jan 2014 #9
If anything, this can be used as positive proof once and for all . . . HughBeaumont Jan 2014 #13
Nice. nt redqueen Jan 2014 #14
very good one. BlancheSplanchnik Jan 2014 #22
Perfect! L0oniX Jan 2014 #37
Unfortunately, it doesn't work... Wounded Bear Jan 2014 #56
That would make a wonderful commercial to put on Fox News classykaren Jan 2014 #94
The answer my friends oldandhappy Jan 2014 #15
thank you. exactly! BlancheSplanchnik Jan 2014 #24
Turn the House blue AND Creideiki Jan 2014 #45
You are on to something. oldandhappy Jan 2014 #80
I'm reminded of the old song. Fuddnik Jan 2014 #16
Saint Peter don't you call me. UncleYoder Jan 2014 #19
Five years older and deeper in debt. sulphurdunn Jan 2014 #18
Channeling Tennessee Ernie Ford? Eleanors38 Jan 2014 #89
Yep. sulphurdunn Jan 2014 #96
Great, tough, cutting-edge song, banned in a few places. Eleanors38 Jan 2014 #98
And I was going to say lobodons Jan 2014 #25
Getting out of Iraq and Afghanistan hollowdweller Jan 2014 #27
Legal Marijuana in 2 states hollowdweller Jan 2014 #28
Expansion of protection for gay people hollowdweller Jan 2014 #29
So Obama passed pot legalization in WA? seabeckind Jan 2014 #50
Thretened, but didnt acttualy act on it. darkangel218 Jan 2014 #61
Last I looked seabeckind Jan 2014 #51
Are you also flummoxed by her (Sotomayor) blocking the ACA birth control . . . brush Jan 2014 #33
I agree lobodons Jan 2014 #40
This may not be the worst time for the Supreme Court to consider this issue. JDPriestly Jan 2014 #49
Sotomayer's stay had nothing to do with Hobby Lobby. last1standing Jan 2014 #55
How does that case apply to the issue of whether a religious organization has to pay for JDPriestly Jan 2014 #99
I think in the terms you're looking for Amos is the better case to study. last1standing Jan 2014 #100
In the Amos case, again, the issue was whether Section 702 of the civil rights law JDPriestly Jan 2014 #101
Yes, and I believe a majority will look to expand Amos here based on accomodation. last1standing Jan 2014 #102
But, as Scalia pointed out in Smith, people who object to war based on religious beliefs must still JDPriestly Jan 2014 #103
As I said, I find Scalia's opinion in Smith to be hypocritical at the least. last1standing Jan 2014 #104
The outcomes in the EEOC and other employment discriminations cases are JDPriestly Jan 2014 #105
Sorry, I didn't mean to suggest that EEOC was directly implicated in this case. last1standing Jan 2014 #106
They can always find an excuse to interpret a law as they wish. JDPriestly Jan 2014 #108
Which is exactly what they did in Smith. last1standing Jan 2014 #109
Yep, the numbers NEVER LIE! democratisphere Jan 2014 #30
Message auto-removed Name removed Jan 2014 #31
Compared to Bush? ...that won't be hard. L0oniX Jan 2014 #38
So as I understand it Proud Public Servant Jan 2014 #32
More Drone Strikes Ezlivin Jan 2014 #36
+ 100% Dow; -0.8% unemployment rug Jan 2014 #39
I do believe the term used in 2007-2008 was FREEFALL ffr Jan 2014 #41
Proof that trickle down economics doesn't work Bradical79 Jan 2014 #43
The Dow at 16000 is not completely meaningless DFW Jan 2014 #44
And those brokers and traders seabeckind Jan 2014 #54
Yeah, try again. I live in Europe. I get all that stuff tossed at me X 10 DFW Jan 2014 #62
My 401K has grown by over 527% during 5 Years of President Obama's Leadership mikekohr Jan 2014 #70
The average 401 is around $85,000 seabeckind Jan 2014 #72
I did not buy into anything mikekohr Jan 2014 #82
Would've been better if the House wasn't standing firmly in the way at all times. [nt] Jester Messiah Jan 2014 #46
But...but...but... Mr.Bill Jan 2014 #48
Nothing in that list shows that the last five years have been any better for the 99%. last1standing Jan 2014 #52
As pointed out above seabeckind Jan 2014 #58
RW Asshole volume.... Wounded Bear Jan 2014 #53
plus1000 Liberal_in_LA Jan 2014 #59
After 5 years? PeggyKR Jan 2014 #60
lets not forget ThomThom Jan 2014 #65
oh I forgot free trade ThomThom Jan 2014 #67
Something missing on this list. mwooldri Jan 2014 #66
actually the Dow closed even higher than that B Calm Jan 2014 #69
Why the nerve of that guy... MADem Jan 2014 #74
Another day older and deeper in debt :P pam4water Jan 2014 #81
Impeach! zappaman Jan 2014 #85
5 years MarcPierre Jan 2014 #86
Is that chart supposed to impress? Looks like the banksters got theirs, and nobody else... Romulox Jan 2014 #92
"The most transparent administration ever." oneshooter Jan 2014 #107
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Five years of Obama and w...