Would you support a constitutional amendment that says that "money is not speech"? [View all]

[Nye Bevan]

Such an amendment would give Congress the right to ban or regulate any kind of speech that involves spending money. This amendment would specify that the current First Amendment only applies to speech that does not involve spending money (for example, citizens making speeches in town squares).

11 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited
	Yes. I would support a constititutional amendment that says that "money is not speech".
	8 (73%)
	No. I would not support a constitutional amendment that says that "money is not speech".
	3 (27%)
	0 DU members did not wish to select any of the options provided.
Show usernames Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll