Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bjorn Against

(12,041 posts)
74. If Schweitzer said something there would be a quote to prove he said it
Thu Jan 16, 2014, 08:54 AM
Jan 2014

Last edited Thu Jan 16, 2014, 09:31 AM - Edit history (1)

You are not even able to come up with a quote from the editorial reporter that says what is being claimed, instead you spin an editorial reporter's words and present that spin as if it were Scweitzer's own words. It is extremely dishonest.

I gather you don't like him. hrmjustin Jan 2014 #1
Nah Cali_Democrat Jan 2014 #3
No one has been able to provide me a quote of him making the racial comment being alleged of him Bjorn Against Jan 2014 #14
I have asked several times for a direct quote on that too ProudToBeBlueInRhody Jan 2014 #34
It is quite sad that some people are trying to present this as if it were fact Bjorn Against Jan 2014 #79
Not really a fan of his either.... ProudToBeBlueInRhody Jan 2014 #111
He said it in an interview. JTFrog Jan 2014 #38
I am still not seeing a direct quote anywhere in what you posted. Bjorn Against Jan 2014 #41
Right. JTFrog Jan 2014 #44
Actually the reporter does not even claim what people here are claiming Bjorn Against Jan 2014 #45
It didn't take a "direct quote" for me to understand the exchange. JTFrog Jan 2014 #69
If Schweitzer said something there would be a quote to prove he said it Bjorn Against Jan 2014 #74
It's the "Dean scream" and "Al Gore claimed to invent the internet" gambit. nt bananas Jan 2014 #81
I didn't spin anything. JTFrog Jan 2014 #84
If you claim someone said something they did not say it is dishonest Bjorn Against Jan 2014 #85
Why are you trying to make this so personal? JTFrog Jan 2014 #88
I am not being nasty, I am simply asking you to back up your claims Bjorn Against Jan 2014 #89
Did he mean get elected twice? Boom Sound 416 Jan 2014 #17
Sounds a lot like Gerri Ferraro there. Yup, sadly, we've got some too! Tarheel_Dem Jan 2014 #27
He is the one potential candidate not on Social Security. former9thward Jan 2014 #2
Is age descrimination a bad thing here. upaloopa Jan 2014 #7
The Constitution discriminates by age when it comes to the President. former9thward Jan 2014 #19
Your post didn't come from the Constitution. upaloopa Jan 2014 #22
I discriminate by age when voting for President. former9thward Jan 2014 #24
Well that is a better excuse. upaloopa Jan 2014 #25
Carter was 52 when he was elected. former9thward Jan 2014 #26
Who the hell else were they going to vote for? upaloopa Jan 2014 #31
yet I'm seeing quite a few statements attempting to rationalize that discrimination LanternWaste Jan 2014 #55
Alexander Pope has a reply for you: WinkyDink Jan 2014 #11
What was appropriate 350 years ago ... former9thward Jan 2014 #20
Yes, that is the way with TRUISMS. *sarcasm* WinkyDink Jan 2014 #59
138 recs and counting, in a pro-Schweitzer thread Electric Monk Jan 2014 #4
No, pretty sure all the new threads are on purpose to flood GD. laundry_queen Jan 2014 #5
Their purpose is NOT to convince anyone of anything. bvar22 Jan 2014 #35
You speak the truth. +1 nt laundry_queen Jan 2014 #56
You mean starting another new thread Capt. Obvious Jan 2014 #77
who cares? why are you throwing such a silly fit over this? cali Jan 2014 #6
+1 laundry_queen Jan 2014 #8
I think it's Obama adulation taken to the nth degree. a bit disconcerting cali Jan 2014 #10
Not sure disconcerting is the right way to put it laundry_queen Jan 2014 #15
now its a new word "adulation"? VanillaRhapsody Jan 2014 #30
No. "Adulation" is an OLD word, bvar22 Jan 2014 #36
Recently applied to people who SUPPORT the current Most Successful Democratic President VanillaRhapsody Jan 2014 #51
definition... VanillaRhapsody Jan 2014 #52
By any reasonable measure... DisgustipatedinCA Jan 2014 #92
I think it is more about hfojvt Jan 2014 #39
Sheep + flame bait = this OP. morningfog Jan 2014 #80
Wow, didn't realize he's such a flamingdem Jan 2014 #9
loooser? HangOnKids Jan 2014 #70
Ewww. Vashta Nerada Jan 2014 #12
No, he isn't really a "fake." BlueMTexpat Jan 2014 #13
Lol. Union Scribe Jan 2014 #16
I'm fascinated as to who chummed the waters today ProudToBeBlueInRhody Jan 2014 #40
Quite. Strategically I think they need to reconsider Union Scribe Jan 2014 #83
Republican talking points when discussing the ACA? LAGC Jan 2014 #18
pray tell Cali_Democrat Jan 2014 #37
Quite simple really. LAGC Jan 2014 #42
So you think he can get through Congress what he could not accomplish in his own state. jeff47 Jan 2014 #62
If he couldn't get his own state to go for single payer under the ACA like VT, why expect him to do freshwest Jan 2014 #58
Great points Montana redneck Jan 2014 #86
Or, Hillary, who supported Bush's wars and still supports drone war. Tierra_y_Libertad Jan 2014 #21
i disagree, he is more real than any third way dem RedstDem Jan 2014 #23
maybe george zimmerman can campaign for him arely staircase Jan 2014 #29
hillary voted to drop bombs on an entire country RedstDem Jan 2014 #76
thanks G_j Jan 2014 #28
I thought he Was giving CChristie a run for his Cha Jan 2014 #32
It's a roll of the dice... kentuck Jan 2014 #33
CD, we know exactly who these people are. Loud, SMALL, always on the internet & pissed! Tarheel_Dem Jan 2014 #43
Oh stop it. LAGC Jan 2014 #46
Why? On most things it sounds like he's to the right of HRC. His initials speak volumes "B.S."! Tarheel_Dem Jan 2014 #90
Nice post! Cali_Democrat Jan 2014 #50
lol! nt ecstatic Jan 2014 #64
ROFLMAO Jamaal510 Jan 2014 #73
Post removed Post removed Jan 2014 #47
I'll continue posting this "crap" Cali_Democrat Jan 2014 #49
The ROFL smilie makes your post like it's trying to hide bitterness and anger. last1standing Jan 2014 #53
Thanks for the headsup. n/t Cali_Democrat Jan 2014 #54
Pulling all the troops out of Afghanistan in exchange for no new gun laws... Hippo_Tron Jan 2014 #48
Why do you think there would be no new gun laws? jeff47 Jan 2014 #65
I guess we could, but for what purpose? Hippo_Tron Jan 2014 #112
Who cares? 99Forever Jan 2014 #57
Lookie here... 2naSalit Jan 2014 #60
I doubt winning is his goal... BklnDem75 Jan 2014 #61
How many OP's have you written about the man today? DisgustipatedinCA Jan 2014 #63
Off Snowden and onto this quest? HangOnKids Jan 2014 #71
+1000 hobbit709 Jan 2014 #75
Got the talking points, huh? Matariki Jan 2014 #66
Delivered to my inbox this morning Cali_Democrat Jan 2014 #68
Thank God HangOnKids Jan 2014 #72
The one where "real" liberals support stand your ground laws?! lol... He's more conservative uponit7771 Jan 2014 #93
He is a conservative Democrat AgingAmerican Jan 2014 #67
As are Obama and Clinton. They may, in fact, be blue-doggier. djean111 Jan 2014 #78
Lol. ForgoTheConsequence Jan 2014 #107
He is from Montana AgingAmerican Jan 2014 #110
Because he's today's NotHillary. MineralMan Jan 2014 #82
The BOG has their marching orders LondonReign2 Jan 2014 #87
Actually....they're not really marching orders Cali_Democrat Jan 2014 #97
Sure seems to upset you. polichick Jan 2014 #91
Clinton/Scweitzer (R) 2016 n/t PowerToThePeople Jan 2014 #94
I've been pulling for this. ForgoTheConsequence Jan 2014 #106
I have seen more attacks against this guy in the last day... NCTraveler Jan 2014 #95
Inquiring minds want to know PowerToThePeople Jan 2014 #96
I have never heard of the guy until yesterday. NCTraveler Jan 2014 #98
I have heard of him PowerToThePeople Jan 2014 #100
If you're still dreaming about Warren running, continually beating up on Hillary gets dull..... brooklynite Jan 2014 #99
I think I am missing something from your post. NCTraveler Jan 2014 #101
I've seen more attack against Obama than republicans daily here, they hate him almost as much uponit7771 Jan 2014 #102
If he is more conservative than Obama he should probably be in the Republican pary. NCTraveler Jan 2014 #104
They who want a white president Capt. Obvious Jan 2014 #109
I'm leaning away from voting for him for those reasons Bradical79 Jan 2014 #103
Hillary supports Keystone. ForgoTheConsequence Jan 2014 #105
That dog won't hunt. bravenak Jan 2014 #108
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why doesn't Brian Schweit...»Reply #74