General Discussion

Orrex

(63,216 posts)

36. I blame Nazi metadata

Reply to RobertEarl (Original post)

Fri Jan 24, 2014, 09:41 AM

Jan 2014

Last edited Fri Jan 24, 2014, 03:42 PM - Edit history (1)

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

199 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Starfish dying in the NW Pacific [View all] RobertEarl Jan 2014 OP

Happening in the Atlantic as well and also happened in the 80's. Bonobo Jan 2014 #1

I guess you missed his post about Fukushima zappaman Jan 2014 #3

First weapons testing, then Chernobyl, now Fukushima RobertEarl Jan 2014 #32

Point being it is adding up, this radiation RobertEarl Jan 2014 #33

I noticed that too DFW Jan 2014 #54

How many times are you going to post this NONSENSE? zappaman Jan 2014 #2

Bobby Brown goes down. nt Bonobo Jan 2014 #5

Flakes. Nt zappaman Jan 2014 #7

Jumbo go away. nt Bonobo Jan 2014 #14

Dumb All Over. zappaman Jan 2014 #16

You won (this time). nt Bonobo Jan 2014 #27

I know you guys think you are clever Generic Other Jan 2014 #49

Except that's not the claim RobertEarl was making. NuclearDem Jan 2014 #58

"scientists can’t rule out nuclear pollution..." Generic Other Jan 2014 #61

Fukushima radiation is not the sole cause of the starfish die off. NuclearDem Jan 2014 #65

Could starfish immune systems be compromised by radiation? Generic Other Jan 2014 #68

Honestly, I'm not well-versed enough in marine biology or radiation to say. NuclearDem Jan 2014 #76

of course immune systems are compromised by radiation questionseverything Jan 2014 #77

It's also technically impossible to rule out alien attacks on our starfish. Yo_Mama Jan 2014 #98

Interesting RobertEarl Jan 2014 #103

If you believe it's nonsense, then either post arguments that prove that it's nonsense, rhett o rick Jan 2014 #83

" I think I can tell nonsense with out their help." zappaman Jan 2014 #86

So now you've lowered yourself to stating that I "need help". You seem certain that you know the rhett o rick Jan 2014 #109

Again and again and again Brother Buzz Jan 2014 #4

Like clockwork... bhikkhu Jan 2014 #13

Indeed, one needs to respond to nonsense Brother Buzz Jan 2014 #19

At this point, it's spamming. zappaman Jan 2014 #23

Starfish wasting predates Fukushima and is happening in other oceans besides the Pacific. Gravitycollapse Jan 2014 #6

The starfish die-off started well before Fukushima, and has happened fairly regularly bhikkhu Jan 2014 #8

"Unless one believes there is a massive multi-national conspiracy to cover up the evidence." Gravitycollapse Jan 2014 #10

Apparently so bhikkhu Jan 2014 #17

People think 6 dump truck loads of thermite were snuck into each WTC tower. Gravitycollapse Jan 2014 #20

DoE testing found Plutonium in Mussels RobertEarl Jan 2014 #9

ENEnews again, eh? zappaman Jan 2014 #11

LOLOLOLOL Berlum Jan 2014 #40

Maybe chemtrails are killing the starfish... SidDithers Jan 2014 #56

Is this your main souirce for your persistence on this issue? passiveporcupine Feb 2016 #194

Don't read it today RobertEarl Feb 2016 #195

You are the one who shouldn't be reading it. passiveporcupine Feb 2016 #197

Sorry to bother you. RobertEarl Feb 2016 #198

This message was self-deleted by its author Journeyman Jan 2014 #12

It's a disease that's killing them off. Vashta Nerada Jan 2014 #15

Starfish facts RobertEarl Jan 2014 #18

Robert ... Fukushima is a terrible ongoing accident ... we all agree on that point ... MindMover Jan 2014 #21

It's no use with this guy. longship Jan 2014 #35

Newest report of Fukushima contamination in the Pacific RobertEarl Jan 2014 #22

From a counter opinion site RobertEarl Jan 2014 #24

you know, I live in the NW Pacific and nobody, absolutely nobody here is talking about this at all Douglas Carpenter Jan 2014 #25

The ocean ecologists are alarmed RobertEarl Jan 2014 #26

They are alarmed. Although not for the same reasons you are. Gravitycollapse Jan 2014 #28

those articles do not even mention Fukushima - they maintain a virus is killing them Douglas Carpenter Jan 2014 #29

Hilarious, since UC Santa Cruz mentions fukushima like zero times nadinbrzezinski Jan 2014 #104

Yep RobertEarl Jan 2014 #106

Really? Claiming persecution? NuclearDem Jan 2014 #118

Funny thing is, the absence of evidence of such persecution will be seen as evidence that it exists. X_Digger Jan 2014 #119

Fish tank RobertEarl Jan 2014 #120

Care to address the time-travelling, ocean-hopping "cause" in post #115? X_Digger Jan 2014 #121

With you? Why? RobertEarl Jan 2014 #124

Lol, can't quote that entire para, can you? X_Digger Jan 2014 #125

Here's another theory RobertEarl Jan 2014 #126

Bull. Union Scribe Jan 2014 #133

Still no response, eh? X_Digger Jan 2014 #134

Are you just pissed off you don't have one? zappaman Jan 2014 #136

Maybe it's chronoton radiation, that travels back in time.. X_Digger Jan 2014 #143

No problem RobertEarl Jan 2014 #137

So.. before Fukushima, therefore.. work with me here.. fukushima can't be the cause, right? X_Digger Jan 2014 #142

You call that logic? RobertEarl Jan 2014 #150

A precedes B, therefore B can't cause A. X_Digger Jan 2014 #151

Why is my user name relevant? NuclearDem Jan 2014 #123

I guess the folks at UC Santa Cruz are part of a huge conspiracy then nadinbrzezinski Jan 2014 #141

From your link passiveporcupine Feb 2016 #196

It was reported by the local TV news in November Generic Other Jan 2014 #43

Check the studies from UC Santa Cruz nadinbrzezinski Jan 2014 #105

That is where I checked Generic Other Jan 2014 #117

Deep Sea News says the same RobertEarl Jan 2014 #122

Yes, they had the same problem back in the 80s nadinbrzezinski Jan 2014 #140

I tend to think you are correct Generic Other Jan 2014 #144

And that is where bioconcentration with migratory nadinbrzezinski Jan 2014 #146

Wrong on both, nadine RobertEarl Jan 2014 #153

Please, quit spreading falsehoods. nadinbrzezinski Jan 2014 #154

They don't know what is causing it RobertEarl Jan 2014 #156

Let's see if you finally get it, latest update nadinbrzezinski Jan 2014 #161

You telling me to stop? RobertEarl Jan 2014 #163

As I expected, you got personal nadinbrzezinski Jan 2014 #165

Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha! longship Jan 2014 #30

I thought that was how one defended one's arguments on a DU Generic Other Jan 2014 #47

Sometimes ridicule is the only appropriate response. longship Jan 2014 #62

It is to the point that I will save the UCSC statement on this nadinbrzezinski Jan 2014 #167

Yup! There is plenty of science on this. longship Jan 2014 #170

And we both worry about the actual science of this nadinbrzezinski Jan 2014 #172

;-) longship Jan 2014 #175

Fukushima-related radioactive materials measured across entire Northern Hemisphere RobertEarl Jan 2014 #31

How Quickly Did Fukushima Radiation Reach North America, And When Will It Peak? passiveporcupine Feb 2016 #199

This belongs in the woo forum. hobbit709 Jan 2014 #34

I blame Nazi metadata Orrex Jan 2014 #36

Wow... SidDithers Jan 2014 #37

Well, it's obvious what's happening here. NuclearDem Jan 2014 #38

. Berlum Jan 2014 #39

I'll see your 'drippy thing' and raise you a 'Starro the Conqueror'. randome Jan 2014 #42

OK. I'll see your Starro, and call you. Lay your melted stars on the table? Berlum Jan 2014 #44

I fold. randome Jan 2014 #46

Thanks for posting, RobertEarl. Octafish Jan 2014 #41

The reason it's being mocked is because it's just plain wrong. NuclearDem Jan 2014 #45

Really? Octafish Jan 2014 #48

Are you serious right now? NuclearDem Jan 2014 #50

... Vashta Nerada Jan 2014 #53

Oh good god. Vashta Nerada Jan 2014 #51

I get it that we need to maintain a skeptical attitude Generic Other Jan 2014 #55

... NuclearDem Jan 2014 #60

Again I would rather discuss why some claims are "ludicrous" Generic Other Jan 2014 #64

The only legitimate response to PRATT has to be ridicule. NuclearDem Jan 2014 #66

Do you reply to all the spam email you get? Union Scribe Jan 2014 #74

I used to post articles too Generic Other Jan 2014 #78

Sometimes people get tired responding to the same debunked claims. longship Jan 2014 #67

I dont think you appreciate the gift of certainty of those knowing what is right vs. what is wrong. rhett o rick Jan 2014 #85

I would hope you realize that sometimes "right or wrong" is subjective and open for rhett o rick Jan 2014 #82

Right or wrong is not subjective in this case. NuclearDem Jan 2014 #88

+1000 zappaman Jan 2014 #90

In my OP it cleary states RobertEarl Jan 2014 #91

No, your OP implies that it is plutonium from Fukushima that is responsible. NuclearDem Jan 2014 #93

No you haven't RobertEarl Jan 2014 #95

All you've been able to do is cite ENENews, NuclearDem Jan 2014 #97

Thanks for the sanity Yo_Mama Jan 2014 #100

" there is no "subjective" in scientific claims. " You dont seem to know much about rhett o rick Jan 2014 #107

First of all, "hypothesis", not "theory." NuclearDem Jan 2014 #110

A simple calendar proves the hypothesis wrong. X_Digger Jan 2014 #111

That is simple and I guess that's your criteria. nm rhett o rick Jan 2014 #114

Does tepco's radiation move backward through time?!? X_Digger Jan 2014 #115

That's more damning of Robert's hypothesis than anything else. NuclearDem Jan 2014 #116

Even the UCSC study that ironically Earl cited as evidence nadinbrzezinski Jan 2014 #145

BS RobertEarl Jan 2014 #155

If there's one thing you're an expert on, it's BS. hobbit709 Jan 2014 #157

Grow up. RobertEarl Jan 2014 #158

I'm not the one indulging in childish make believe hobbit709 Jan 2014 #159

I wonder if he "checks out the chicks"? zappaman Jan 2014 #162

I will repeat this again so you can understand this nadinbrzezinski Jan 2014 #160

You go tell this to the folks telling you star fish are not dying due nadinbrzezinski Jan 2014 #193

When a poster keeps posting the same bullshit over and over and keeps being told why they are wrong zappaman Jan 2014 #89

I am not surprised that you try to justify your mocking and ridicule. You never do it rhett o rick Jan 2014 #113

Thanks Octafish RobertEarl Jan 2014 #70

shocking you like this post. n-t Logical Jan 2014 #75

Especially the folks doing the research on the matter nadinbrzezinski Jan 2014 #171

Let's not forget the sardine die off.... Bennyboy Jan 2014 #52

You, personally, are making a mockery of the fukushima event. NCTraveler Jan 2014 #57

Yes they are, but it has nothing to do with Fukushima. MineralMan Jan 2014 #59

Very nice, mm RobertEarl Jan 2014 #79

Why thanks! MineralMan Jan 2014 #80

Shallow advice RobertEarl Jan 2014 #81

Not this shit again.. X_Digger Jan 2014 #63

There's no scientific evidence of your claim alarimer Jan 2014 #69

Plutonium found in mussels RobertEarl Jan 2014 #71

.000000000004 Ci/kg in some mussels Union Scribe Jan 2014 #132

For fuck sake! longship Jan 2014 #164

Thanks for the kick RobertEarl Jan 2014 #166

When all your kicks ridicule your post I will bet you still won't stop. longship Jan 2014 #168

I say we see this exact same post for the 6th time within 10 days. zappaman Jan 2014 #169

No way, my friend. longship Jan 2014 #173

Yup! It's a double down. longship Jan 2014 #192

I personally am not going to worry about Fukushima Blue_In_AK Jan 2014 #72

That's understood RobertEarl Jan 2014 #73

I think that this is an interesting theory but I would have to see proof before rhett o rick Jan 2014 #84

Thanks RobertEarl Jan 2014 #87

Those in their denial bubbles are afraid of the truth. There and many reactors rhett o rick Jan 2014 #135

That's the problem RobertEarl Jan 2014 #138

Oh for God's sake. A single reactor at Three Mile Island suffered a partial meltdown. NuclearDem Jan 2014 #139

I would not quite say zero instances nadinbrzezinski Jan 2014 #147

I don't see any conclusive evidence that TMI's radiation caused cancer. NuclearDem Jan 2014 #148

There have been a few nadinbrzezinski Jan 2014 #149

Will this ridiculous meme ever die? Yo_Mama Jan 2014 #92

You are in denial? RobertEarl Jan 2014 #94

The DEFINITIVE link....Not going to copy/paste it, beware those on dial-up uppityperson Jan 2014 #96

LOVE IT. NuclearDem Jan 2014 #99

Get a bowl and a bottle of milk because these claims are Cuckoo for Cocoa Puffs. nt longship Jan 2014 #101

Thanks for the information. democratisphere Jan 2014 #102

Thank you, democratisphere RobertEarl Jan 2014 #108

The government, like many here, won't even acknowledge the possibility of radiation contamination. democratisphere Jan 2014 #112

Living in the Tampa Bay area we have this discussion often with experts in the field of Harmony Blue Jan 2014 #127

Yes. Worth their salt. Good term RobertEarl Jan 2014 #128

+1 Absolutely Harmony Blue Jan 2014 #129

Or rising sea temperatures. NuclearDem Jan 2014 #130

Rising sea temperatures isn't likely Harmony Blue Jan 2014 #174

Except rising sea temperatures have been the cause of previous starfish die offs. NuclearDem Jan 2014 #176

Something seems off this time around Harmony Blue Jan 2014 #180

Here's another discussion idea RobertEarl Jan 2014 #131

Yup nadinbrzezinski Jan 2014 #179

YiKes gopiscrap Jan 2014 #152

List of my posts in thread: Starfish dying in NW Pacific RobertEarl Jan 2014 #177

As promised nadinbrzezinski Jan 2014 #178

Octafish post, Thanks Octafish RobertEarl Jan 2014 #181

From the idiots doing the research nadinbrzezinski Jan 2014 #182

Oh my God, this thread just never stops! NuclearDem Jan 2014 #184

I think he believes that if he keeps repeating it in spite of being disproven, it'll stick. X_Digger Jan 2014 #191

Summary RobertEarl Jan 2014 #183

From the clueless folks ACTUALLY DOING THE RESEARCH nadinbrzezinski Jan 2014 #185

It's really cool how the radiation went backward in time to make the sea stars sick. LeftyMom Jan 2014 #186

I am working on a fictional FTL drive nadinbrzezinski Jan 2014 #190

You're really planting your flag on this one, aren't you? NuclearDem Jan 2014 #188

This thread should be in creative speculation... SidDithers Jan 2014 #187

Arrrrrgh!!!!!!! longship Jan 2014 #189