Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

sharp_stick

(14,400 posts) Fri Jan 24, 2014, 02:26 PM Jan 2014

Startling Number of Scientific Papers Disputed Human-Caused Global Warming Last Year [View all]

How many exactly....One, one lousy paper out of 2258 peer reviewed articles.

The tally since 1991: Nearly 14,000 papers that supported human causes behind global warming (chiefly from burning fossil fuels over the past century), and just 24 that rejected human causes.

It's amazing what a well funded smear campaign by such luminary pieces of shit like the Koch brothers combined with GOP drones that will believe anything fed to them like pre-chewed pablum will do.

http://www.weather.com/news/science/environment/startling-number-scientists-dispute-human-caused-global-warming-20140122

14 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Startling Number of Scientific Papers Disputed Human-Caused Global Warming Last Year [View all] sharp_stick Jan 2014 OP

I would love to see a little "global warming" this afternoon in northern Florida. ... spin Jan 2014 #1

It doesn't matter what is causing it so don't get sucked into playing that game. randome Jan 2014 #2

It does matter what is causing it! Vattel Jan 2014 #4

Disagree. Reducing fossil fuels is an immediate way to stem the problem. randome Jan 2014 #7

but the only justification for stemming fossil fuels is the fact that they geek tragedy Jan 2014 #10

Oy. Kind of like how treating a disease doesn't require knowing what causes it? geek tragedy Jan 2014 #6

What causes a heart attack? Diet? Weight? Indolence? randome Jan 2014 #8

no, they want to steer us away from the obvious answer: cutting carbon emissions nt geek tragedy Jan 2014 #9

The article is not accurate. Vattel Jan 2014 #3

Actually the article is accurate Progressive dog Jan 2014 #5

Um, I pointed out the inaccuracy. The problem is not the research Vattel Jan 2014 #11

Sorry, I misunderstood your point Progressive dog Jan 2014 #13

no problem. cheers. Vattel Jan 2014 #14

Amazing is right. Octafish Jan 2014 #12