Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Conservatives Say We Should Let Charities Help the Poor in Lieu of the Government [View all]
Conservatives attempt to justify their lack of empathy and support for the disadvantaged among us by saying that charities should be helping the poor and not the government. This is a very lame argument.
How would that help the average wage-earner? The only answer the conservatives have is that it would lower taxes. Instead of giving $100 to the poor via taxes, the wage-earner could give $100 to the poor via a charity. The bottom line is that it wont save the wage-earner any money unless he doesnt donate. The help for the poor will come from the wage-earners either via the government or via charities.
> Furthermore the current fraction of help for the poor that is carried by charities is very small.
Overall, the U.S. government spends $105 billion annually on food programs to help the hungry, federal figures show. (1) Compare that to, Feeding America, the largest food charity in the United States (and one of the largest charities overall), moves $5 billion of food and funding to hungry people each year. (1)
Another false conservative talking point is that if you eliminated federal funding for food programs, then charities would pick up a larger portion.
Many {conservative} activists say that if taxes are reduced, private giving will automatically increase. But history shows that's incorrect. For each of the last 40 years, Americans have given away the same proportion of money without change: roughly 2 percent of GDP. Even after the Bush tax cuts in the early part of the century, the rate of giving didn't rise, experts say. (1)
If you eliminate federal funding of food programs, people will die.
> Also, what the conservatives ignore is the fact that charities get a high percentage of their revenue from .......... .. wait for it . the federal government.
Catholic Charities is one of the nation's most extensive social service networks, serving more than 10 million poor adults and children of many faiths across the country. It is made up of local affiliates that answer to local bishops and dioceses, but much of its revenue comes from the government. Catholic Charities affiliates received a total of nearly $2.9 billion a year from the government in 2010, about 62 percent of its annual revenue of $4.67 billion. (2)
Conservatives dont actually wish the poor would die, they just dont care if they do.
Sources:
(1) http://articles.philly.com/2013-05-02/news/38960249_1_charity-hunger-special-supplemental-nutrition-program
(2) http://mediamatters.org/mobile/blog/2012/09/12/oreillys-accidental-support-for-planned-parenth/189845
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
79 replies, 8599 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (57)
ReplyReply to this post
79 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Conservatives Say We Should Let Charities Help the Poor in Lieu of the Government [View all]
rhett o rick
Feb 2014
OP
What ever. Your experiance is not mine. I served a homeless food line for many years.
L0oniX
Feb 2014
#31
Though some make distinctions between the two (time, e.g.), wages and salaries are sisters under the
WinkyDink
Feb 2014
#7
1. Charity makes them feel good. 2. Charity makes them feel superior. 3. Charity can be withheld.
WinkyDink
Feb 2014
#6
4. Charity is a tax deduction, rather than more taxes 5. You don't go to jail for either with-
merrily
Jan 2015
#74
I got up and walked out the last time I heard this refrain from a pulpit.....
northoftheborder
Feb 2014
#9
If charities were so good at providing social services before the government started doing it
MNBrewer
Feb 2014
#13
A friend of my brothers believes the BS that the churches would do a better job than
cstanleytech
Feb 2014
#20
80% of all philanthropic $ in this country go to churches, hospitals & universities.
stopbush
Feb 2014
#23
I sometimes wonder if these conservatives have ever actually known any poor people
Skittles
Feb 2014
#60
TRUE Conservatives would follow Puritan John Winthrop's "A Model of Christian Charity" sermon.
TheBlackAdder
Feb 2014
#26
1) As I recently posted, "city on a hill" was in the NT before it was in Gov. Winthrop's sermon
merrily
Jan 2015
#66
They were escaping religious persecution, and operated as a religious collective.
TheBlackAdder
Jan 2015
#69
You did. You win a Gold Star. I objected on other posts, here and elsewhere. Congrats.
TheBlackAdder
Jan 2015
#71
Um, you raised the issue of your not objecting to Reagan's getting credit, not I.
merrily
Jan 2015
#72
Does anyone remember the exchange between Sister Simone Campbell from Nuns on the Bus
okaawhatever
Feb 2014
#32
"Conservatives don’t actually wish the poor would die, they just don’t care if they do."
Spitfire of ATJ
Feb 2014
#42
How disingenuous: government should not help the poor, but keep lavishing gifts, subsidies, and
indepat
Feb 2014
#45
What they really mean is they want organized religion to facilitate the transaction
Major Nikon
Feb 2014
#46
Good point. When a corporation needs a subsidy send them to their favorite charity. nm
rhett o rick
Feb 2014
#54
I volunteer at a foodbank and we only give out enough per month to last for 3 days.
rhett o rick
Feb 2014
#65
I am sure there are conservatives that wish the poor would die, but I think a lot of
rhett o rick
Jan 2015
#79