Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Hey women [View all]Orrex
(63,230 posts)301. You told me to define God, and then you redefined God
Can't have it both ways.
And stay away from my ice cream.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
680 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
it is off another thread. no challenging evo psych or you challenge evolution.
seabeyond
Feb 2014
#572
if you challenge evo psych, you challenge evolution. (that was the statement made)
seabeyond
Feb 2014
#575
i am cooking. i will get back to finding the OP. bonobo posted it last night.
seabeyond
Feb 2014
#579
i am talking the real issue, and do not give a shit what we call ourselves. but i do care about men
seabeyond
Feb 2014
#219
We are most definitely a species of great ape--not that there's anything wrong with that!
tblue37
Feb 2014
#205
bonobo, bonobo, bonobo, you must accept objectification because well... bonobo's.
boston bean
Feb 2014
#8
well see, no one said that either. time to go back and use the c word, cause you are pissed? nt
seabeyond
Feb 2014
#23
i mean your glee in throwing out the c word every chance you get. the most vulgar and vile word
seabeyond
Feb 2014
#27
??? by calling me one? really? and this is the man that you are, that we are suppose to respect?
seabeyond
Feb 2014
#32
of course you never said it. you might get a hide. just might. you did imply.
seabeyond
Feb 2014
#39
not a cute little game. vile, vulgar word that you pull out often and dismiss with, didnt call
seabeyond
Feb 2014
#66
you, as a man, that created the insulting vileness of a word toward women, reject that they have any
seabeyond
Feb 2014
#75
and as each one of you men, that feign outrage over the word, has also expressed it bothers you not.
seabeyond
Feb 2014
#88
I haven't. I haven't called anyone on DU a dick, nor have I applauded anyone being called a dick
seaglass
Feb 2014
#112
again. you make sure you throw the word out in a manner that will not get a hide, or might, to
seabeyond
Feb 2014
#123
it is a matter of staying on point, your go to word is the c word to be as vile as you can
seabeyond
Feb 2014
#154
While we're on the subject of the naughty word list, can I nominate the word 'ape' to be added?
Violet_Crumble
Feb 2014
#652
that would be silly violet, but you can surely do whatever the fuck you want. truly. nt
seabeyond
Feb 2014
#665
omg. so you use a highly vulgar, vile word toward women because men made sure that word was vile
seabeyond
Feb 2014
#160
you have used it often, and sometimes repetitively and have had hides because of it. you use it
seabeyond
Feb 2014
#168
i wouldnt waste the time of my day on you, in that regard bonobo. a man thats go to word
seabeyond
Feb 2014
#177
a year or more ago, you had two or three ops repeatedly using offensive words toward women.
seabeyond
Feb 2014
#193
of course you do not. no skin off your knee to be called either, cause it is a slur against women.
seabeyond
Feb 2014
#199
oh. so you get to decide to use the c word cause you have decided women are not, should not be
seabeyond
Feb 2014
#209
The handful of men here who insist on explaining to women how they know what women think amuse me.
redqueen
Feb 2014
#218
i believe he believes. and though that may sound complimentary, it is anything but sad. nt
seabeyond
Feb 2014
#224
i think it is fair for me to say, i really do not give a shit what you think. yup.
seabeyond
Feb 2014
#565
you had no reason to use it yesterday but to puff out your chest to the men in the mens group.
seabeyond
Feb 2014
#227
i have, its no biggie, personally fanny is worse to me. context etc matters.
loli phabay
Feb 2014
#415
says the man that doesnt know the difference between rape and not. i hardly take you seriously.
seabeyond
Feb 2014
#212
skinner has repeatedly told us to "educate" over the last couple years. you have issue? talk to
seabeyond
Feb 2014
#291
when a person asks the board what is rape and what is not. i think there needs to be education.
seabeyond
Feb 2014
#344
actually violet you absolutely validated what i said. and he uses it repeatedly in exactly the
seabeyond
Feb 2014
#666
"examples from animals always seem to mention the ones that "support" male supremacy."
seabeyond
Feb 2014
#92
gentically yes, but I'll tell you one thing, my life is nothing like the life of a bonobo.
boston bean
Feb 2014
#448
You do understand that "descended from" and "equivalent to" are not remotely the same thing?
MadrasT
Feb 2014
#13
yes, you are using evo psych like religion uses dominance over women. educate yourself. start here.
seabeyond
Feb 2014
#19
Yes you're right our classification, if you will is basically that humans are apes
ismnotwasm
Feb 2014
#286
bonobo said... no challenging evo psych, that is challenging evolution. that is what started this.nt
seabeyond
Feb 2014
#335
yes. agreed. and tha tis what the issue of this thread is. DEMANDING we buy into the garbage
seabeyond
Feb 2014
#356
It is impossible to prove a negative. The burden is on the one making the claim to prove it's true.
redqueen
Feb 2014
#99
We are built the same, and the only thing we have is a brain almost as well developed as a dolphin,
Nika
Feb 2014
#110
I don't see anyone in this thread disputing that we're related to our cousins in category. nt
redqueen
Feb 2014
#127
I take umbrage to the notion we are not classified in a way our taxonomic nomenclature
Nika
Feb 2014
#142
We are animals too. And sometimes we do do things of a sexual nature that is irrational
Nika
Feb 2014
#170
free for all rape. just animals here. wtf boys. go at it. and this, is the issue. nt
seabeyond
Feb 2014
#180
We are animals too. And sometimes we do do things of a sexual nature that is irrational,
Nika
Feb 2014
#172
We are animals. We torture, kill and imprison dolphins which have culture, a language,
Nika
Feb 2014
#391
My understanding of proof is that it is impossible to prove a negative which is what you just asked.
Tuesday Afternoon
Feb 2014
#144
can you prove there is No God ... by the way 5 is not a negative number.
Tuesday Afternoon
Feb 2014
#244
If God exists, then God is an ice cream cone perched on my desk and plainly visible to all
Orrex
Feb 2014
#278
evo psych, which you base all of your manhood on, is. and science confirms. nt
seabeyond
Feb 2014
#43
exactly. stick three asses out on a mag cover and all of a sudden we have this shit. nt
seabeyond
Feb 2014
#96
it would be funny, if not so disgusting having bonobos saying it is innately there right to tap that
seabeyond
Feb 2014
#119
i love your voice, whisp. and i was in a totally opposite environment. my men say WTF.... lol.
seabeyond
Feb 2014
#165
you left out the part, if you do not believe in evo psych, you do not believe in evolution or some
seabeyond
Feb 2014
#257
If that was your point, then why start by emphatically declaring that we aren't apes?
Silent3
Feb 2014
#120
or they do nto exist at all, merely want to use science to create a new religion by taking behavior
seabeyond
Feb 2014
#70
exactly nuclear. god forbid anyone actually read what scientists say is the fail of evo psych.
seabeyond
Feb 2014
#104
"we're also inherently capable of higher reasoning and intelligence than most other species"
redqueen
Feb 2014
#101
Oh, so we are back to stating that our sex lives ought to be just like monkeys and apes.
boston bean
Feb 2014
#67
and you can ignore the issues with promoting evo psych cause it meets agenda and relegated to the
seabeyond
Feb 2014
#72
If humans had a similar mating strategy to bonobos, we would probably *be* bonobos.
dawg
Feb 2014
#15
it is stupid. that simple. and to insist if you call out faux science evo psych, you are
seabeyond
Feb 2014
#16
we assume. we look at today, and make it work from beginning of time. when they actually
seabeyond
Feb 2014
#202
this is why it does not work. they are finding women were hunting with the men, or hunting
seabeyond
Feb 2014
#243
soooo...on the ape spectrum, some men are more "apey" and have more...
WhaTHellsgoingonhere
Feb 2014
#37
ba ha ha ha ha. perfect. what is this, two years now, about the damn doors, in every damn post. lol
seabeyond
Feb 2014
#176
The only thing that makes the ape thing particulary offensive is the associated history.
Silent3
Feb 2014
#107
what is offensive is men using it as a new scientific approach to religion to storytell their way to
seabeyond
Feb 2014
#113
Please provide a link to a DU poster making the case in favor of male dominance over...
Silent3
Feb 2014
#134
here would be one, today, in this thread. an Op last night of bonobo. i am not
seabeyond
Feb 2014
#187
So you're saying that right here in this thread someone is calling for male dominance and...
Silent3
Feb 2014
#236
If someone is trying to be convincing, they've taken on some obligation to be convincing.
Silent3
Feb 2014
#294
Correct we are a different species of apes from other apes and would expect differences
aikoaiko
Feb 2014
#188
Isn't that what we have been saying all along? money. the economy. the driving force behind all this
Tuesday Afternoon
Feb 2014
#617
using a body without regard to being a person. that is ALWAYS damaging. that simple.
seabeyond
Feb 2014
#667
one point. we do not disagree that people will make their choices and that is theirs to live.
seabeyond
Feb 2014
#669
I really hope this doesn't mean we're going to have to deal with evo-psyc on this board.
seabeyond
Feb 2014
#109
already happened in this thread. i have scientist debunking evo psych in this thread, but no one is
seabeyond
Feb 2014
#196
it goes along with evo psych is the new religion in the name of science that allows male dominance
seabeyond
Feb 2014
#141
it does not hurt these mens feelings to see themselves as unevolved apes. it is their definition
seabeyond
Feb 2014
#217
They seem to think that comparing themselves to apes absolves them of responsibility
BainsBane
Feb 2014
#231
Well, it's false to think that it's womens destiny to be treated like and ape.
boston bean
Feb 2014
#266
I doesn't really matter to me the evolution of whether we are classified as an ape or not.
boston bean
Feb 2014
#382
what is wrong is assigning it to evo psych so you are all powerful in your sexuality and womens
seabeyond
Feb 2014
#289
this makes no sense, there is wide diversity in what physical attributes attract different men.
bettyellen
Feb 2014
#360
another fail of evo psych. of course those that preach it would assert that the reason. conditioned
seabeyond
Feb 2014
#274
and those guys are apes. Akin is an ape. Einstein was an ape. RW conservative women are apes
arely staircase
Feb 2014
#258
no. she is arguing bonobos OP that if you do not believe in evo psych, you do not believe in
seabeyond
Feb 2014
#310
i have not said shit about where we come from. i repeatedly talk the issue about men using evo psyc
seabeyond
Feb 2014
#300
i did not say shit where we came from so do not say i did. this is about bonobos thread telling as
seabeyond
Feb 2014
#326
which are supposedly noted for their use of tools, language and capacity for abstract thought
arely staircase
Feb 2014
#297
Am I the only one who hasn't seen a link to the post which has so knotted undergarments?
lumberjack_jeff
Feb 2014
#316
My takeaway: lots of guys are defending the idea that humans are, sexually, just like apes.
Squinch
Feb 2014
#368
The OP, as everyone responding in this thread is aware, specified that the poster did not like
Squinch
Feb 2014
#413
"If the original assertion had been that she doesn't like being compared to a bonobo,
Squinch
Feb 2014
#441
It is and it isn't, and that's the simple truth...proof that we have not fully evolved...kind of sad
AuntPatsy
Feb 2014
#347
Then what is coming into the thread and arguing with her saying "We are apes!" doing?
kcr
Feb 2014
#422
Well even the best reply will fall flat when the other person won't listen.
LostOne4Ever
Feb 2014
#640
There are benefits to living on the West Coast. Like sleeping through this whole train wreck.
Comrade Grumpy
Feb 2014
#375
Does that mean you can employ whatever arguments you wish in support of your cause...
AZCat
Feb 2014
#469
No, the claim that you are " an anti evolutionary right wing religious nut bag."
AZCat
Feb 2014
#540
I don't think I agree with your conclusion that we are failures when it comes to context.
AZCat
Feb 2014
#473
No. I think people are playing games when they make wild, highly improbable claims
kcr
Feb 2014
#543
I'm not qualified to determine if I suffer from a rare neurological or personality disorder.
AZCat
Feb 2014
#548
You aren't expected to have a catalog of my posts memorized... (that'd be ridiculous!)
AZCat
Feb 2014
#554
That context should be ignored when it has nothing to do at all with what's being talked about
kcr
Feb 2014
#624
everyone knows what BB was saying and referring to. the jury that did not participate knew
seabeyond
Feb 2014
#507
I get a laugh out of the "we" and "us" that flows so liberally in your posts.
lumberjack_jeff
Feb 2014
#414
You're seeing the downside of your Sisters in the Army of God(dess) approach.
lumberjack_jeff
Feb 2014
#434
No, I don't think so. A subthread back and forth with you doesn't constitute a "doubling down"
kcr
Feb 2014
#457
I'm amused by what some people find to nitpick when they don't have an actual valid argument n/t
kcr
Feb 2014
#426
Hey boston, do me a favor...ban me the fuck from HoF. I know I've never posted
msanthrope
Feb 2014
#509
Yes..because there are posts so cringingly bad on this thread that right now, we have anti-vaxxers
msanthrope
Feb 2014
#516
You guys have done bans on people for posts they've made outside that forum. Ban me. nt
msanthrope
Feb 2014
#593
Apparently you do give a shit who posts there...you have 45 people blocked. You apparently
msanthrope
Feb 2014
#605
Just dropping in to say I went straight from the OP to here without reading a single post.
rug
Feb 2014
#477
I was serious because I thought you were talking about content that some object to
seaglass
Feb 2014
#679