Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
52. All I will say is I am glad I don't have kids
Fri Mar 7, 2014, 05:13 PM
Mar 2014

Going through the school system at this point.

Though do not mind paying the taxes that fund it, as politicized as it's become.

both ways work... both 'make sense' ProdigalJunkMail Mar 2014 #1
Yup +1 Adrahil Mar 2014 #3
I get it, but it does seem weird, as it is focuses on the concept 'difference' rather HereSince1628 Mar 2014 #68
I am very old but I was able to figure out the logic of the bottom example Gothmog Mar 2014 #72
That is how I think about arithmetic (though don't write it out) cthulu2016 Mar 2014 #2
but how do you know... lame54 Mar 2014 #24
If you work with numbers a lot fried eggs Mar 2014 #49
Continuing the conceptual work Ms. Toad Mar 2014 #76
It is a horrible example to show the technique exboyfil Mar 2014 #4
When I do it in my head Vashta Nerada Mar 2014 #5
How is 37 5 away from 142? Madam Mossfern Mar 2014 #7
37 is five away from 42. Vashta Nerada Mar 2014 #20
In my head, I would do it as follows pokerfan Mar 2014 #12
The problem is when teachers ONLY teach it the common core way joeglow3 Mar 2014 #25
And therein lies the problem with The System, kentauros Mar 2014 #65
It is an educational fad AngryAmish Mar 2014 #66
Oh, I agree that good teachers know multiple ways to solve these problems. kentauros Mar 2014 #71
I just subtact 30 first, then 7. Or vice versa. n/t cui bono Mar 2014 #23
Then there's the MFM approach pokerfan Mar 2014 #42
I would do fried eggs Mar 2014 #50
I guess I'm just too old. Madam Mossfern Mar 2014 #6
That example is horrible. Control-Z Mar 2014 #19
That's the old way mathematic Mar 2014 #26
That's how I do it, too. amandabeech Mar 2014 #67
That's an extreme example, used for emphasis of an agenda... Wounded Bear Mar 2014 #8
Common Core does suck because it treats all kids the same and dismisses kids who struggle. liberal_at_heart Mar 2014 #9
I used to struggle in school. I just don';t think like other people hollysmom Mar 2014 #16
I've heard that it's the opposite Renew Deal Mar 2014 #74
I have a son who is struggling through public school. He is autistic and in special education. liberal_at_heart Mar 2014 #77
the late nobel-winning physicist richard feynman had a great story about solving math in your head unblock Mar 2014 #10
It's division to 100 decimal places jsr Mar 2014 #14
there we go. he was also a much better storyteller than i am.... unblock Mar 2014 #15
In this example its quicker to count down from 32. GeorgeGist Mar 2014 #11
I like the Reddit example in the article. One that isn't quite so obvious with large number Pretzel_Warrior Mar 2014 #13
Well now that's better sharp_stick Mar 2014 #17
It is a question of discipline, not math Vox Moi Mar 2014 #18
Please check the pop-psych at the door mathematic Mar 2014 #36
Very conservatively said, sir! Vox Moi Mar 2014 #47
Foiled again by Google-U mathematic Mar 2014 #54
Gee … and I was just guessing Vox Moi Mar 2014 #58
As a political scientist with two MAs (MA in Political Theory, MA in Communications)... Chan790 Mar 2014 #64
Question about algorithms Vox Moi Mar 2014 #55
Yeah, that's fine for an algorithm mathematic Mar 2014 #56
Is there a term for this kind of Algorithm? Vox Moi Mar 2014 #57
Indeed there is mathematic Mar 2014 #63
Okay, I am now officially old. cui bono Mar 2014 #21
IIRC, the idea with this approach is to massage the problem you have into math facts winter is coming Mar 2014 #28
Oh! I see. Thanks for the explanation. cui bono Mar 2014 #29
The controversy is that it's different and some people have never thought of it that way. winter is coming Mar 2014 #32
The suggestion is that a student could explain the bottom ex. not the top. HereSince1628 Mar 2014 #38
I never claimed that it did construct foundational understanding. winter is coming Mar 2014 #40
Not saying that you did. But elementary arithmatic is sort of foundational isn't it? HereSince1628 Mar 2014 #45
I get it, but WTF? nt Demo_Chris Mar 2014 #22
The worst part is some 4rd grade teacher will fail a student because they use the core method liberal N proud Mar 2014 #27
People's brains work differently. Some people learn better visually, some aurally... cui bono Mar 2014 #30
I went round and round with the teacher on that and my daughter lost. liberal N proud Mar 2014 #34
It's not some 4th grade teacher. It's the Almighty Test. If the child, on the Almighty Test, Squinch Mar 2014 #60
Are the conservatives going to use this pic for their post about English? cui bono Mar 2014 #31
For everyone who doesn't get this Proud Public Servant Mar 2014 #33
But you are taught to borrow. cui bono Mar 2014 #35
Yes, but my point is Proud Public Servant Mar 2014 #37
The concept of borrowing flows naturally from the understanding of placevalue mathematic Mar 2014 #39
Right -- and leads you to the concept of place value Proud Public Servant Mar 2014 #41
not everyone thinks, or learns, in the same way jobendorfer Mar 2014 #43
Wittgenstein would like this example. Number games instead of word games aikoaiko Mar 2014 #44
People who use math all the time will develop their own strategies. They should teach the old fried eggs Mar 2014 #46
"teach the basics and let people come up with their own shortcuts." kentauros Mar 2014 #70
In stats we do something analogous by having students learn the.... aikoaiko Mar 2014 #48
We are so accustomed to base 10 central scrutinizer Mar 2014 #51
All I will say is I am glad I don't have kids nadinbrzezinski Mar 2014 #52
I don't even think about that subtraction problem. MineralMan Mar 2014 #53
The common core does suck. Here in this thread, there are about 20 people, talking about Squinch Mar 2014 #59
Both are really bad ways to teach children to subtract. Donald Ian Rankin Mar 2014 #61
...and people wonder why I will never send my kids to public school. Chan790 Mar 2014 #62
That method seems needlessly complicated to me alarimer Mar 2014 #69
I think what they're trying to do is to break up the numbers to the nearest 5s and 10s. kentauros Mar 2014 #75
That just shows you how you could do it in your head treestar Mar 2014 #73
The idiots on other boards are simply too stupid to understand the concepts involved Gothmog Mar 2014 #78
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»About That ‘Common Core’ ...»Reply #52