Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
29. "They got us to the moon!"
Sat Mar 15, 2014, 09:44 PM
Mar 2014

Yeah, and? Overcoming earth's gravitational pull and using trigonometry to land on our sattelite is certainly challenging, but it's an entirely different ballpark from what we're looking at with regards to the intricacies of human impact on the planet's overal ecology and hte ramifications that may have on what we consider "civilization."

Do remember that much of the world dwells in conditions you and i probably wouldn't consider to be very "civilized" (not a value judgement on the people, just a note of the technological and resource disparity between societies.) Most, simply because of flukes of economics or politics. The wrong guy(s) in office can send an entire nation into a civilizational death-spiral. The wrong people having economic influence can have the same effect. "Civilization" is a fragile thing supported by a very intricate network of interconnected things, where hte failure of one can threaten the entire network and send civilization into freefall.

And at the end of the day, every society is 100% dependent on the environment. We can't escape that, ever. There is no Asimovian magic pill to free us from the demands of earth or the biology thereof. We're plugged in, for good. Even if in some wild future we leave, we'll still be carrying earth-bubbles with us the whole way.

kr....nt MindMover Mar 2014 #1
Well, duh? Scootaloo Mar 2014 #2
With a high tech enough civilization an asteroid couldn't sneak up on us Fumesucker Mar 2014 #6
In other words... ChisolmTrailDem Mar 2014 #9
Well, exactly. It's not as if anyone in charge is actually doing anything other Nay Mar 2014 #43
"Our biology"? Are you *fucking* kidding me? AverageJoe90 Mar 2014 #8
"humans aren't actually primates" Scootaloo Mar 2014 #15
Do realize I pointed out what the science actually says..... AverageJoe90 Mar 2014 #18
Citation? Scootaloo Mar 2014 #25
Wikipedia disagrees with you Electric Monk Mar 2014 #26
We're so lucky to have rocket scientists to help us understand stuff. L0oniX Mar 2014 #47
Chimpanzees and bonobos are more closely related to humans cpwm17 Mar 2014 #21
"Chimpanzees and bonobos are more closely related to humans"..... AverageJoe90 Mar 2014 #39
I'm just wondering where you were told that stuff. Warren Stupidity Mar 2014 #53
No religious school.....fuck, man, I don't even like creationism. AverageJoe90 Mar 2014 #54
google Hominidae dude, you are embarrassing yourself. Warren Stupidity Mar 2014 #28
. Bonobo Mar 2014 #35
Humans are definitely primates marions ghost Mar 2014 #42
+1000 GliderGuider Mar 2014 #45
Well, as soon as civilization crashes we'll be back to eating melons on the plains until we turn 40 Nuclear Unicorn Mar 2014 #52
It might actually save the planet 1000words Mar 2014 #3
I see it happening this way. airplaneman Mar 2014 #4
yeah well we aren't going to take the necessary steps. The Mayan and Roman models apply. Warren Stupidity Mar 2014 #5
*Sigh*.....this hyperbolic shit again? AverageJoe90 Mar 2014 #7
What's "hyperbolic" about it? Fumesucker Mar 2014 #10
I didn't miss that part. It was one of the only good parts, TBH. AverageJoe90 Mar 2014 #13
History shows again and again how nature points out the folly of men Fumesucker Mar 2014 #17
Godzilla? Really? nt AverageJoe90 Mar 2014 #27
Word. n/t leeroysphitz Mar 2014 #50
NASA sure could use your brilliant mind. 1000words Mar 2014 #11
I've actually done my research on AGW. AverageJoe90 Mar 2014 #16
Anxiously awaiting the conclusions of your research 1000words Mar 2014 #20
*facepalm*. AverageJoe90 Mar 2014 #23
Why are you asking me? 1000words Mar 2014 #24
No, he just reads other's interpretation of research on skepticalscience.com NoOneMan Mar 2014 #32
The focus of the report appears to be broader, resource exhuastion in general, it is a very real Warren Stupidity Mar 2014 #30
"serious trouble in the years ahead" NickB79 Mar 2014 #40
I know a lot more actual facts than most of the "doomers", that's for sure. nt AverageJoe90 Mar 2014 #41
"They got us to the moon!" Scootaloo Mar 2014 #29
...and when they got there they found Alice. L0oniX Mar 2014 #46
Call Paul Ryan, he'll tell us what to do. Kingofalldems Mar 2014 #12
It will all be ok once we stop people from smoking, owning guns, eating olive garden, and porn The Straight Story Mar 2014 #14
I thought cornflake fried chicken was the real threat? Fumesucker Mar 2014 #19
Indeed. So many threats others want to save us all from by force The Straight Story Mar 2014 #22
And pitbulls - don't forget pitbulls! hatrack Mar 2014 #38
Smoking is fine. It's those e cigs that are deadly. Autumn Mar 2014 #48
There is one significant difference: sulphurdunn Mar 2014 #31
That's important, but I think population size will matter more cprise Mar 2014 #33
No no no, we're not gonna get wiped out DeadLetterOffice Mar 2014 #34
Everything LiberalElite Mar 2014 #36
They must be figuring in Apophis visiting and knocking out satellites and in 2029 before it returns freshwest Mar 2014 #37
No shit. ...hmmm ...something about finite resources, the 1% and global climate change. L0oniX Mar 2014 #44
Without a Trace ‘The Sixth Extinction' G_j Mar 2014 #49
I just finished reading this book. It was excellent! nt octoberlib Mar 2014 #51
Kicking for Human Primates! nt Bonobo Mar 2014 #55
+1 Warren Stupidity Mar 2014 #56
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»NASA-funded study: indust...»Reply #29