Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: What Obama ACTUALLY said about Iraq [View all]berni_mccoy
(23,018 posts)20. What exactly did Obama omit that makes what he said revisionism?
Because, I'm wondering, was he supposed to cover every aspect of what was wrong with the war in Iraq in order to not be revising it? That's what it's sounding like. The standard that this man must meet is far beyond what would be expected of any other. On all sides.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
39 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Give it a rest. Your "reality" isn't backed up by facts. No matter what you one Iraqi source tells
okaawhatever
Mar 2014
#3
Thanks--it occurred to me, but I didn't want to add to the proliferation of meta threads!
beerandjesus
Mar 2014
#33
Then why did he say we worked within international law and did not grab its resources for our own.
liberal_at_heart
Mar 2014
#15