Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Spider Jerusalem

(21,786 posts)
3. ...
Fri Mar 28, 2014, 01:06 PM
Mar 2014
A new study suggests that changes to autism diagnosis criteria may be more to blame for rising rates of the developmental disorder than anything else.

Since the 1960s, autism prevalence rates have skyrocketed from 4 in 10,000 children to a current reported rate of 1 in 88. The reason behind the rise, however, has remained unclear.

Now researchers are shedding new light on the trend by applying current diagnostic criteria to data from a 1980s study on autism prevalence in what’s believed to be a first-of-its-kind analysis.

The original study, published in 1989, looked at hundreds of Utah residents ages 3 to 25 who were suspected to have autism. Clinicians used DSM-III criteria to assess individuals as “diagnosed autistic” or “diagnosed not autistic” and ultimately found an autism prevalence rate of 4 in 10,000 in Utah at that time.

But when a research team from the University of Utah applied current diagnostic criteria from the DSM-IV-TR to records from participants in the two-decades-old study, they found that most who were deemed to be autism-free at that time would receive the label today.

http://www.disabilityscoop.com/2012/06/29/autism-surge-analysis/15957/


Many studies look at the prevalence of autism, akin to taking a snapshot of the number of diagnoses in a given population. The new study instead examined the disorder’s incidence, or newly reported diagnoses, each year.

(snip)

Better diagnostic practices may explain these large hikes in incidence, says Maureen Durkin, professor of population health sciences and pediatrics at the University of Wisconsin in Madison.

“There’s much more awareness of autism,” say Durkin, who was not involved in the study. “There’s much more screening going on. And the newer generation of clinicians are being trained in this so they are more likely to see it.”

This increased attention to autism and its symptoms may also explain the rise in diagnoses of teenagers and adults.

An age-stratified analysis shows that children between the ages of 4 and 13 make up about 63 percent of the new autism cases. The fastest acceleration in new cases is in those diagnosed between 14 and 20 years of age.

Individuals diagnosed between 21 and 65 years of age account for about 9 percent of the new cases — but their proportion also significantly increased over the time frame of the study. Like girls, many of the adults are diagnosed with higher-functioning forms of autism, such as Asperger syndrome and PDD-NOS.

https://sfari.org/news-and-opinion/news/2014/rising-awareness-may-explain-spike-in-autism-diagnoses
My feeling is that this has to do with toxic chemicals in the environment in NJ LiberalEsto Mar 2014 #1
Utah’s autism rate continues to be above average but it’s holding steady at about 2% of population. proverbialwisdom Mar 2014 #2
The Salt Lake Tribune article has 10 comments at the moment, the NJ.COM in the OP has 21. (nt) proverbialwisdom Mar 2014 #9
... Spider Jerusalem Mar 2014 #3
Makes sense n/t PasadenaTrudy Mar 2014 #4
The first link is outdated and has been disproven; no problem with observations in the second. (nt) proverbialwisdom Mar 2014 #8
It's neither outdated nor disproven Spider Jerusalem Mar 2014 #11
Check it out. proverbialwisdom Mar 2014 #6
It's changing diagnostic criteria. Spider Jerusalem Mar 2014 #13
I respect your knowledgeable viewpoint but defer to the parents. proverbialwisdom Mar 2014 #15
Parents are not medical professionals. Spider Jerusalem Mar 2014 #16
Please consider reading up on Hannah Poling, VICP (Vaccine Injury Compensation Program) and EBCALA. proverbialwisdom Mar 2014 #17
A finding of liability in a court is not a finding of medical fact, either. Spider Jerusalem Mar 2014 #18
Please review that more carefully, you've misinterpreted an admittedly rushed post. proverbialwisdom Mar 2014 #19
The only cranks I see here... Spider Jerusalem Mar 2014 #20
Autism, as classically understood, is being overturned by current research as we speak... proverbialwisdom Mar 2014 #21
Just stop. Spider Jerusalem Mar 2014 #22
You are defending an abstract concept without noticing its application changes over time & location. proverbialwisdom Mar 2014 #30
I don't see this as a political issue, it is a scientific and medical issue. Spider Jerusalem Mar 2014 #31
We agree science will sort it out but disagree that all scientists are in agreement at the moment. proverbialwisdom Mar 2014 #33
Please show me a credible peer-reviewed study... Spider Jerusalem Mar 2014 #35
Well I do like another Andrew's research, for over 25 yrs. Dr. Andrew Moulden TheNutcracker Mar 2014 #27
... Spider Jerusalem Mar 2014 #28
The man had a family and children. Hope they don't get this google as you are just plain mean. TheNutcracker Mar 2014 #34
"California's Autism Increase Not Due To Better Counting, Diagnosis" lumberjack_jeff Mar 2014 #24
If the proverbial wisdom about "follow the money" is traced here, closeupready Mar 2014 #5
I wouldn't call it a scandal jmowreader Mar 2014 #10
I suspect you are either correct, or the reality is some kind of game like you describe. closeupready Mar 2014 #12
Considering that federal funding of Special Education is short changed lumberjack_jeff Mar 2014 #26
I have to admit knowing a number of kids with autism in the state hollysmom Mar 2014 #7
coud it be that the criteria for diagnosis is less strict now? Steve Martines Mar 2014 #14
What exactly is germane or interesting about the number of comments? lumberjack_jeff Mar 2014 #23
Maybe it's a trick to get you to click on the article? reformist2 Mar 2014 #25
The NYT wrote 117 words about this announcement on page A18, or so the parents noted. proverbialwisdom Mar 2014 #32
It should be it's own axis and scale IMO ck4829 Mar 2014 #29
This just in: Layoffs at Star-Ledger, NJ.com, other Advance newspapers top 300 proverbialwisdom Apr 2014 #36
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Guess the number of comme...»Reply #3