Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

closeupready

(29,503 posts)
5. If the proverbial wisdom about "follow the money" is traced here,
Fri Mar 28, 2014, 01:11 PM
Mar 2014

I'm wondering how much federal money is available for school districts with higher autism rates. Considering how corrupt New Jersey is, I wouldn't be surprised if a scandal emerged about rates being massaged, in some way.

My feeling is that this has to do with toxic chemicals in the environment in NJ LiberalEsto Mar 2014 #1
Utah’s autism rate continues to be above average but it’s holding steady at about 2% of population. proverbialwisdom Mar 2014 #2
The Salt Lake Tribune article has 10 comments at the moment, the NJ.COM in the OP has 21. (nt) proverbialwisdom Mar 2014 #9
... Spider Jerusalem Mar 2014 #3
Makes sense n/t PasadenaTrudy Mar 2014 #4
The first link is outdated and has been disproven; no problem with observations in the second. (nt) proverbialwisdom Mar 2014 #8
It's neither outdated nor disproven Spider Jerusalem Mar 2014 #11
Check it out. proverbialwisdom Mar 2014 #6
It's changing diagnostic criteria. Spider Jerusalem Mar 2014 #13
I respect your knowledgeable viewpoint but defer to the parents. proverbialwisdom Mar 2014 #15
Parents are not medical professionals. Spider Jerusalem Mar 2014 #16
Please consider reading up on Hannah Poling, VICP (Vaccine Injury Compensation Program) and EBCALA. proverbialwisdom Mar 2014 #17
A finding of liability in a court is not a finding of medical fact, either. Spider Jerusalem Mar 2014 #18
Please review that more carefully, you've misinterpreted an admittedly rushed post. proverbialwisdom Mar 2014 #19
The only cranks I see here... Spider Jerusalem Mar 2014 #20
Autism, as classically understood, is being overturned by current research as we speak... proverbialwisdom Mar 2014 #21
Just stop. Spider Jerusalem Mar 2014 #22
You are defending an abstract concept without noticing its application changes over time & location. proverbialwisdom Mar 2014 #30
I don't see this as a political issue, it is a scientific and medical issue. Spider Jerusalem Mar 2014 #31
We agree science will sort it out but disagree that all scientists are in agreement at the moment. proverbialwisdom Mar 2014 #33
Please show me a credible peer-reviewed study... Spider Jerusalem Mar 2014 #35
Well I do like another Andrew's research, for over 25 yrs. Dr. Andrew Moulden TheNutcracker Mar 2014 #27
... Spider Jerusalem Mar 2014 #28
The man had a family and children. Hope they don't get this google as you are just plain mean. TheNutcracker Mar 2014 #34
"California's Autism Increase Not Due To Better Counting, Diagnosis" lumberjack_jeff Mar 2014 #24
If the proverbial wisdom about "follow the money" is traced here, closeupready Mar 2014 #5
I wouldn't call it a scandal jmowreader Mar 2014 #10
I suspect you are either correct, or the reality is some kind of game like you describe. closeupready Mar 2014 #12
Considering that federal funding of Special Education is short changed lumberjack_jeff Mar 2014 #26
I have to admit knowing a number of kids with autism in the state hollysmom Mar 2014 #7
coud it be that the criteria for diagnosis is less strict now? Steve Martines Mar 2014 #14
What exactly is germane or interesting about the number of comments? lumberjack_jeff Mar 2014 #23
Maybe it's a trick to get you to click on the article? reformist2 Mar 2014 #25
The NYT wrote 117 words about this announcement on page A18, or so the parents noted. proverbialwisdom Mar 2014 #32
It should be it's own axis and scale IMO ck4829 Mar 2014 #29
This just in: Layoffs at Star-Ledger, NJ.com, other Advance newspapers top 300 proverbialwisdom Apr 2014 #36
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Guess the number of comme...»Reply #5