Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Obama administration urges Supreme Court to dismiss suit brought by anti-Bush demonstrators [View all]Cha
(298,021 posts)100. I see a post is hidden that got a little carried away with the knee jerk Obama hate..
There's too much good news coming with Obama now.. they need something to whine about and bring out their stupid ass "used car salesman" shit.. brought to them by the great derper.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
107 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Obama administration urges Supreme Court to dismiss suit brought by anti-Bush demonstrators [View all]
n2doc
Mar 2014
OP
Telling it like it is in a radically right-wing-controlled society featuring a radically
indepat
Mar 2014
#65
What about the link is incorrect? We have the real story. Whenever the Left peacefully protests
sabrina 1
Mar 2014
#24
Where is it incorrect? Show me another source that shows the Obama admin asked for this to be
FSogol
Mar 2014
#26
The corporate media is a 'legitimate source'? Since when do you totally accept what
sabrina 1
Mar 2014
#32
Well I haven't see a post by you acknowledging it. And you kept denying it well after the first post
cui bono
Mar 2014
#95
how about Nina Totenberg, dear? because NPR did a long piece about this dogshit casez
cali
Mar 2014
#89
The same thing I said before: using wsws.org as a source on a so-called "Democratic" website sucks.
FSogol
Mar 2014
#96
Follow the lead of the poster above who attacks the source rather than the content
n2doc
Mar 2014
#11
So the wsws link was correct. I have found that to be the case regarding that site more often than
sabrina 1
Mar 2014
#33
Right here "backed by the administration of President Barack Obama, had appealed that ruling."
Jesus Malverde
Mar 2014
#30
Constantly repeating your denials doesn't make them legit. You are ignoring the facts
cui bono
Mar 2014
#92
This is how you are supposed to proceed. You are supposed to attack the source!!
sabrina 1
Mar 2014
#25
No...the Obama administration is defending the two Secret Service agents who appealed. WsWS sucks,
msanthrope
Mar 2014
#39
No...the constitutional issue won't be reached if qualified immunity is found. That's what makes
msanthrope
Mar 2014
#43
No....they are not 'competing.' This is basic legal procedure you learn on the first
msanthrope
Mar 2014
#46
Exactly..because it's an SS case, I think it makes a poor 1st amendment one. nt
msanthrope
Mar 2014
#62
I see a post is hidden that got a little carried away with the knee jerk Obama hate..
Cha
Apr 2014
#100
Well, we have to "look forward", whistle a happy tune, and think beautiful thoughts.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Mar 2014
#28
Unrec for a shitty source that ineptly describes the legal issues at hand. Here's the link to the
msanthrope
Mar 2014
#36
I'm always suspicious when agenda driven reporting doesn't give a link to the primary source...and
msanthrope
Mar 2014
#40
Bias against the favorite source of banned troll of Hannah Bell? You Better Believe It! nt
msanthrope
Mar 2014
#47
What would the reaction be here if the Secret Service re-routed President Obama away from Tea Party
onenote
Mar 2014
#48
^this^ Whilst others kvetch about the source ^this^ hits the nail on the head..
truebrit71
Mar 2014
#57
I remember when people were being excluded from Bush's campaign events because they wore
Maedhros
Mar 2014
#71
I understand the legal rhetoric being used to undermine the First Amendment here.
Maedhros
Mar 2014
#69
wsws edited the actual exchange between plaintiff's counsel, Roberts, and Scalia
onenote
Mar 2014
#81
+1. About DU: "Sharing news and information, free from the corporate media filter"
Catherina
Mar 2014
#74